rofl, this is full of crap

Luis G

<i><b>Problemator</b></i>
Staff member
Muslim Woman Sues to Wear Veil for License


capt.1054070000.license_veil_dob107.jpg


ORLANDO, Fla. - Experts in Islamic law are being called to testify in the lawsuit of a Muslim woman fighting a state order to take off her veil for her driver's license photo.

Sultanna Freeman, 35, says Florida's insistence on photographing her face violates her religious rights.

"I don't unveil ... because it would be disobeying my Lord," Freeman testified Tuesday at the start of her non-jury trial.

Assistant Attorney General Jason Vail argued that having an easily identifiable photo on a driver's license is a matter of public safety.

"It's the primary method of identification in Florida and the nation," Vail said. "I don't think there can be any doubt there is a public safety interest."

Freeman's attorneys argue that state officials didn't care that she wore a veil in her Florida driver's license photo until after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, an allegation the state denies.

"This is about religious liberty. It's about whether this country is going to have religious diversity," said Howard Marks, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union (news - web sites) of Florida.

Both sides planned to call experts in Islamic law at the trial, which continues Wednesday. A copy of the Quran has been entered into evidence.

Freeman, a convert to Islam previously known as Sandra Kellar, wore her veil for the photo on the Florida driver's license she obtained after moving to the state in 2001.

Nine months later, she received a letter from the state warning that it would revoke her license unless she returned for a photo with her face uncovered.

Freeman claims her religious beliefs require her to keep her head and face covered out of modesty and that her faith prohibits her face from being photographed.

Source
 
If she can't get her picture taken, then I guess she doesn't get a license...that's a privilege, not a right :retard:
 
Leslie said:
If she can't get her picture taken, then I guess she doesn't get a license...that's a privilege, not a right :retard:
Yep. This is outrageous. Yeah, we didn't care before 9/11. Now we do. Get over it.
 
Plus, she converted to this religion. What, did she find the light all of a sudden?

I'm sorry, but if this case is upheld, it is complete crap!
 
Even I have to agree that the state has more rights in this one than the individual. Maybe they can bring in 8 people in burkas with the same (seen)facial features & ask her husband to identify her :D
 
What if her religon says you can't stop for police officers?

I agree, driving is not a right. That's made clear in the drivers manual.
 
This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. That photo on your license is there for identification purposes. Who the fuck would recodnize one veiled woman from another?

If she doesn't want to go along with that, then too bad. She should get her robes adjusted with a split in the middle so she can ride a bike.
 
She doesn't want her picture taken for a license, fine, she doesn't get one... that's the law. She doesnt' agree with the laws, and thinks she doesn't have to obey them, she has two choices: move to another country, or test this one and move to a jail cell. I'd be fine with either.
 
Well i guess she did unvail once for a purpose of the state. She was arrested in 1998 on a child abuse charge. Maybe child abuse isn't disobaying her lord though.?(
 
HeXp£Øi± said:
She was arrested in 1998 on a child abuse charge. Maybe child abuse isn't disobaying her lord though.

Didn't realize Catholics wore veils. :confuse3:
 
Back
Top