Sorry folks, but you're wrong...

[Gonz]

of course neither should be subject to special tax.

That's all that matters.

 

[spike]

[potheads united]But it's just a harmless little plant...[/potheads]

[pillheads united]My pills may not be as effective and far more addictive but damnit...they're in pill form![/pillheads united]

 

[SouthernN'Proud]

soft drinks are EASILY as harmful as coffee to the body. they likely contribute to escalating health care costs far more than coffee.

of course neither should be subject to special tax.

I never said harmful to the body. I took their words and used them. They want to tax soft drinks because they have caffeine. But coffee and tea, which have exponentially more caffeine (the taxed substance), are exempt.

Reading comprehension...P/F.

and if i wanna walk two doors down and pay $4 for a drip coffee... that's my problem

Indeed.

 

[Gonz]

[pillheads united]My pills may not be as effective and far more addictive but damnit...they're in pill form![/pillheads united]

Look up Legal & Illegal.

 

[spike]

Done.

What was your point?

 

[Gonz]

*whooooossssshhhhhh*

Damn, you missed it.

 

[2minkey]

I never said harmful to the body. I took their words and used them. They want to tax soft drinks because they have caffeine. But coffee and tea, which have exponentially more caffeine (the taxed substance), are exempt.

Reading comprehension...P/F.

my comment was more additive - no pun intended - in a generalized sense, as this thread is about health risk and mother government.

context comprehension... P/F.

 

[spike]

*whooooossssshhhhhh*

Damn, you missed it.

If you had one why not make it? Don't be scared.

 

[Gato_Solo]

Speaking of mother government, does this remind anyone of a certain term I like to use for just such a scenario?