ResearchMonkey
Well-Known Member
political voodoo?
I can't believe that nobody noticed his dictatorship unfold before our eyes.
SotU address
We don't need no stinking Congress.
Creating Executive Orders, isn't that an ability granted to him by the constitution you vehemently defend?
Don't forget, EO's can be (and at times are) reversed by any following president. Will your next leader revoke it? Watch out for the pie in your face.
I didn't say it was a right, just an ability.No, an Executive Order is not a Constitutional right.
Even if they were, if the President decides to override Congress, then what is the use of Congress? A dictator needs no help.
wikiU.S. Presidents have issued Executive Orders since 1789. Although there is no Constitutional provision or statute that explicitly permits Executive Orders, there is a vague grant of "executive power" given in Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 of the Constitution, and furthered by the declaration "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed" made in Article II, Section 3, Clause 4.
The Bolsheviks, founded by Vladimir Lenin, were an organization of professional revolutionaries under a democratic internal hierarchy governed by the principle of democratic centralism, who considered themselves as the vanguard of the revolutionary working class of Russia
In Marxist theory, the proletariat is the class of a capitalist society that does not have ownership of the means of production and whose only means of subsistence is to sell their labour power[1] for a wage or salary.
Marxism defines the bourgeoisie as the social class that owns the means of production in a capitalist society. Marxism views the group as emerging from the wealthy urban classes in pre- and early capitalist societies.
I didn't say it was a right, just an ability.
As for a dictator, this is the same ability exercised by our past dictators. I'm just asking whats the difference?