pc_builder
New Member
They didn't attack the shooter, did they?
Why would they run up and attack the one who is currently shooting? Since you are not currently shooting, someone could very well attack you if they believe they have the advantage. The advantage being that you aren't shooting at them, and your nearness to them.
Is it about dying in the fetal positon under a table?
I would have expounded more on my last statement, but I had to pick up and drop off a couple people. Had to leave in a rush.
Besides, I don't know how trying to ridicule someone is going to help defend your side of the debate.
Using your own gun and trying to take out the shooter yourself isn't the only way to "man up". And if that's the last valid reason you can come up with to support your side, it makes you sound like a person who thinks guns are the only solution.
I have considered the possibility of how I would go about defusing this scenario if I had my own gun. And maybe I would act as you would. But you should also consider how you could react to the situation without resorting to your gun. Your gun shouldn't be your go-to solution.
I agree with Bish here in that you could do a lot more good trying to get the other people out of harm's way as fast as possible. Helping others to get to safety doesn't make you less of a man.