The downfall of America has begun

I think it depends on the circumstances... where one parent can afford to stay at home to raise the kids I think it's influence is much less. But when both parents are working full time or a single parent is working full time and have little time to spend with their children, friends can become a substitute for what is lacking in the family and that's when there can be problems.
 
*ptewy* I spit on peer pressure. That is the job of the parents, to teach independent thinking. Sheep are to be lead & I don't want no stinking sheep in my house.

Single parents shouldn't be.

Divorced parents-depends.

2 income households-*rasberry* lower your desires. If my wife & I can do it, so can the rest of the world.


How has mankind sucessfully managed over 10,000 years of parenting before these weak kneed sissies came along & convinced some that the kids are in charge?
 
Gonz said:
*ptewy* I spit on peer pressure. That is the job of the parents, to teach independent thinking. Sheep are to be lead & I don't want no stinking sheep in my house.

Single parents shouldn't be.

Divorced parents-depends.

2 income households-*rasberry* lower your desires. If my wife & I can do it, so can the rest of the world.


How has mankind sucessfully managed over 10,000 years of parenting before these weak kneed sissies came along & convinced some that the kids are in charge?

I should have said "lone parent", for whatever reason. The majority of lone parents in this country are divorced or separated. Also most families here don't earn enough on a single salary for the wife to stay at home, those that do are lucky. Especially when we get our local taxes raised by 18% for the year and we've only had a 3% pay rise!
 
Gonz said:
Don't burden them with adult decisions & don't let them think you approve of sex before adulthood (marriage for some).

Thank you for that, you've hit it precisely. The issue is adulthood, not marriage. For some, adulthood comes at around 16-17, if your parents did a decent job of raising you. Abstinence teaches you only one thing, that sex is bad.

furthermore, it's not the inability to handle the consequences that makes the difference, it's the inability to accurately FORSEE the consequences before making the decision. And promoting abstinence while depriving them of all sexual awareness is reinforcing precisely that weakness.
 
Oh, and as far as your abortion ravings are concerned, I bet my life that the proportion of abortions coming in from those families preaching abstinence will end up significantly higher than those who gave their kids the chance to avoid it.
 
“42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot.” - Steven Wright

“I've come loaded with statistics, for I've noticed that a man can't prove anything without statistics.” - Mark Twain


:shrug: ;)
 
A13 said:
The issue is adulthood

Main Entry: 2adult
Function: noun
Date: 1658
: one that is adult; especially : a human being after an age (as 21) specified by law

If they can't make kegal decisions, they aren't an adult.


A13 said:
Abstinence teaches you only one thing, that sex is bad.

That's where you're failing to see the light. That is not what abstinance teaches at all. It teaches you that we're more than mere animals. It teaches you to have control over your urges. It teaches you independent thinking & actions far outweigh instinctual behavior. It also tends to make the act more special. What gift could be better than knowing you're the first & only to do these things to this person, because he/she waited for YOU?

A13 said:
Oh, and as far as your abortion ravings are concerned, I bet my life that the proportion of abortions coming in from those families preaching abstinence will end up significantly higher than those who gave their kids the chance to avoid it.

Me? Ravings? Nah, I'm pro-choice. That would be an interesting study & I bet different.
 
Gonz said:
It teaches you to have control over your urges.
You were pubescent at some point, I assume. Perhaps you'd like to think back on that time candidly and honestly and reconsider that statement?

It also tends to make the act more special.
Sorry, religious rhetoric alert!
 
Gonz said:
Me? Ravings? Nah, I'm pro-choice. That would be an interesting study & I bet different.

OK, called them ravings because you started talking about effects of abortion more or less randomly... ;)

Gonz said:
If they can't make kegal decisions, they aren't an adult.

That's where you're failing to see the light (or at least, the light is shining in a different direction ;) ). I'll determine the level of adulthood of my kids by the decisions they make, not by some arbitrary number imposed by some politicians who have never met my kids and who (more importantly) have to set standards for the average family who raise their kids teaching them backwater ideas precisely like abstinence.



Gonz said:
That's where you're failing to see the light. That is not what abstinance teaches at all. It teaches you that we're more than mere animals. It teaches you to have control over your urges. It teaches you independent thinking & actions far outweigh instinctual behavior. It also tends to make the act more special. What gift could be better than knowing you're the first & only to do these things to this person, because he/she waited for YOU?

Abstinence doesn't teach anything of the sort. It's human interaction and experience that teaches that - the very experience that you're trying to take away from them. How can you possibly claim that it's teaching independant thinking when you're not giving them the chance to think for themselves? Indeed, your argument just a few posts ago was that they're not capable of making those decisions.
As for actions and instinctual behaviour, instinctual behaviour in the end is simply what you've so far taken for granted and haven't got around to questioning yet. If you want them to get past their instincts, show them a world where sex is not a dirty word, rather than simply pulling a few woollen sweaters over their eyes.

Let me clear something up here. I have no problem per se with the promotion of abstinence, in and of itself - if you prefer that then you can let your kids know. What I find abhorrent is the idea that people are thinking they can create sexually healthy kids by HIDING all knowledge of how to look after themselves sexually. Teach them everything and then encourage abstinence, fine - just don't shout abstinence at them all day and then lock them in a box so that they never know anything else.

What gift would be better than "saving yourself"? How about the freedom from this putrid idea that sex is "giving yourself up" to someone? Perhaps maybe the knowledge that you won't have to worry about what your wife is teaching (or repressing) your kids about sex when you're not around? The knowledge that your kids will be able to grow up leading HEALTHY sex lives instead of treating it as something to be ashamed of? Granted, today's crop will need a bit of help getting to the healthy (not in the medical sense) part, but the least we can do is point them in the right direction. Then it's up to the parents to allow their children to figure out for themselves what a fuck-up has been caused by sexual repression in the past. Then maybe we just might have given them a decent chance.
 
A13 said:
What I find abhorrent is the idea that people are thinking they can create sexually healthy kids by HIDING all knowledge of how to look after themselves sexually. Teach them everything and then encourage abstinence, fine - just don't shout abstinence at them all day and then lock them in a box so that they never know anything else.

We are in full agreement. Where we seem to differ is you 0seemingly) assume that all/most people who preach abstinance are the zealots of yesteryear. I don't. Many of them are, yes. My assumption is, they're likely the ones who don't want to be 38 year old grandparents. I'm one of those. My son could probably teach many adults a thing or two about reproductive facts. He also will have it drilled into him that teenage births caused by him will be his problem, not mine. Quit school, dad no longer pays for college cause he's got a kid to raise. I'm not suggesting we return to the Eisenhower years, that was silly. I also don't think kids need to be taught precisely how to perform cunninglingus. That's equally silly. Demonstrations of proper condom etiquette is not what our kids need. How can we expect or accept public institutions teaching sex-ed when they can't even teach the "three R's" correctly.

As far as "saving yourself", I knew a few who did & most who didn't. Not a single one of the virginal marriages had to deal with pre-marital children, gonorrhea, syphilus, herpes, warts, etc. Our species could have worse role-models.
 
a bit off topic, the Three R's ?? :confuse3:

As far as taking decisions for them, i agree up to certain point, if you don't give your sons the right to decide for themselves you are doing more harm than good. Have you ever considered that your children might turn into a 30-year old that can't make a decision on its own?

Indeed, the risks involved in sexuality are of your concern and thus you want to protect them. Plus it seems to me that you did with your kids what i suggested previously. :shrug:

Better to let them know the facts, advantages, disadvantages and risks of having an active sex life, and then let them decide on their own.

My son could probably teach many adults a thing or two about reproductive facts. He also will have it drilled into him that teenage births caused by him will be his problem, not mine. Quit school, dad no longer pays for college cause he's got a kid to raise.
 
Three R's is an old (and somewhat stupid) adage...Readin', 'riting & 'rithmatic.

Teaching your kids to be decision makers & letting them know that you don't approve of teen sex can easily go hand in hand. I'll bet, to this day, most people on this board (and every other one for that matter) still has their mom or dads voice in their head when they screw up.

Lay down the expectations & rules. They will be lived up to. If they aren't, there are consequences. Just like in real life. Gotta start somewhere.
 
Gonz said:
I'll bet, to this day, most people on this board (and every other one for that matter) still has their mom or dads voice in their head when they screw up.
I must be the exception then since the only voice in my head at such a time is my own. Then again what other people see as screw-ups I tend to see as learning experiences, which don't have negative connotations in my book.

Oh yes and I left home just after my 18th birthday to train and work as a student nurse and was perfectly capable of standing on my own two feet and making my own decisions at the time... something you seem to think 18 year olds today are not capable of doing. But then I had been working for and managing my own money since I was 14, so it wasn't a very big step for me.
 
Main Entry: 2adult
Function: noun
Date: 1658
: one that is adult; especially : a human being after an age (as 21) specified by law

16 year olds can make legal decisions here. 18 year olds are classified as adults here. So precisely where does 21 come into that mix and who says that a 21 y/o is better equipped to handle such situations?
 
Aunty Em said:
I must be the exception then since the only voice in my head at such a time is my own. Then again what other people see as screw-ups I tend to see as learning experiences, which don't have negative connotations in my book.

I was gonna say precisely that but then decided the rest of my blabbering took precedence. :)
 
21 is the legal age at which you are an adult in the states. Because we all know that the states is the capital of the world :rolleyes:

Here after the age of 16 your parents can not access yoru medical records without your permisson, at the age of 18 you ar elegally an adult and can buy lotteyr ticekts and make porn, at the age of 19 you can buy booze, and smokes.

It's simply the law though, it has NO bearing how emotionally mature a person is.
 
Back
Top