The homosexual agenda
- Thread starter Gonz
- Start date
![[b]](/data/avatars/m/0/144.jpg?1334500048){kind=avatar}
[b]
New Member
I apologize Mr. Bishop, I thought your orginal point in your post was that the goverment had taken over the role completely, and my response was to that. I suppose I should say, "Have you stopped to consider the reason why marriages moved over into the legal realm in the second place?"
MrBishop
Well-Known Member
[b] said:
Actually, if you read some of my past posts, you'll find that I am not only one of the more stout supporters of same-sex unions, but the first to point out how weak the state of modern marriage has fallen. I've actually used similar arguments, all to no avail.
There's something about going against the '5,000 year old tradition of the definition of marriage' which puts walls up faster than anything that I've ever seen before. As if such a tradition has never changed in the past.
Hi, my name is MrBishop...but around here, they call me:
POSTAL-BOY!
MrBishop
Well-Known Member
[b] said:
I know...it's all about the money and the power...taxation doesn't hurt either
I think that people's individual greed and their willingness to sue at the drop of a hat, drove it into GVT control more than the GVTs desire for more red-tape beurocratic bullshit 
Per your first seperation link
I agree wholeheartedly. In fact read my signatures. However, if we are forced out of the religious business because of what the Constitution says then we are also forced out of the welfare, education, medical business, to name a few, as well.
I agree wholeheartedly. In fact read my signatures. However, if we are forced out of the religious business because of what the Constitution says then we are also forced out of the welfare, education, medical business, to name a few, as well.
OK, granted, long ago. Next.
In that case they can't talk about much can they? Especially since damned near every law is based in or upon religious tenet.
Food stamps...welfare in general. Used to be local & private. LBJ, about 1965 saw some new uses for federal momey.
Another example of why homosexuals are better than lawyers.
The rise of radical feminism & the closet exiting homer secks you alls. The ugly bitches convinced the not so ugly wimins that men are the enemy & should be avoided at all costs. Lots of periodicals & dailies used illogical & badly conceived data to create a mythology. It spread like wildfire & some wimins thought hairy underarms was sexy. It's taken almost 40 years to show what damage had been done. Notice that women are re-asserting their right to be moms again. That little turn of events is really pissing off the ugly chicks.
Coming out of the closet, while personally freeing, created a confused class of children & adults. Doubt me? Take a look at the crap going on right now in New Jersey.
People like Anna Nicole & Brittney Spears & all thier idiot friends are not a good example. Notice that people gawk. Like a bad car wreck, there are some gruesome things that our brains say NO to but our inner child demands to see anyway.
Just because we aren't perfect is no reason to quit the search.
One marriage. Never divorced. One child from within those confines. I do trust, honor & love her. Explicitlly. You're marriage won't weaken mine. It will help weaken an already shaky establishment. No-fault Divorce has done more damage than can be repaired in a couple of decades. It takes time. We don't need more sand thrown below the base.
Homosexuals cost more than their fair share individually. More sick time, more illnesses, more major diseases. HOw can they reduce cost by doubling up? Fantasy.
Horeseshit. Hasn't anyone who prefers same sex partners ever heard of Office Depot or Staples? Hell, what about attorneys. A few of them don't suck (is that offensive to say in a thread with a gay guy
) POWERS of ATTORNEY. All kinds of legal crap. No, it doesn't cure everything (like the snobby mom-in-law) but it cures damned near every single legal argument.Just like all queers hang out near the boys room.
They are using the exact same methods the homosexual community use(s, d). Don't like it? Sorry. Look at their arguments & look at yours. Identical. Once one barrier comes down, each subsequent barrier is easier to overcome.
Enough for now.
BeardofPants
New Member
*BoP still doesn't get why govts feel the need to legislate marriage dependent on which hole is getting plugged.
BeardofPants said:*BoP still doesn't get why govts feel the need to legislate marriage dependent on which hole is getting plugged.
Many of our laws are based on community standards. Societal norms that evolve over time - sometimes. What flys in NYC (New York City?!?!
) will not do so in Cincinatti. Ever hear the expression "How will it play in Peoria"? The heartland has traditional values. The coastlines are in fluctuation.
[b]
New Member
Gonz said:Many of our laws are based on community standards. Societal norms that evolve over time - sometimes. What flys in NYC (New York City?!?!
What gets me is how people keeps throwing out the whole buisess about how societal norms evolve, yet are doing their best to squash the process.
BeardofPants
New Member
Watchit, PT, he'll be after your ass next. 
ResearchMonkey
Well-Known Member
Squash the process? Calling anyone that opposes the idea is bigoted or a homophobe is militant. Forcing people to condone behavior they don’t believe in is not evolution that is revolution; revolutionary, progressive et cetera does not necessarily mean is it a good thing.[b] said:
I yearn for those days when simplicity, it seemed, was the rule for life.
[b]
New Member
Either way, isn't someone forcing someone? You easily see me wanting what I see as equal rights as something that I shouldn't be allowed to have, therefore forcing me to follow your beliefs. Yet you can only see the other side of the coin, where me wanting what I see as equal rights as forcing you to allow me to have them.
Pot... kettle, kettle... pot.
Pot... kettle, kettle... pot.