The Path to 9/11

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
This belongs in the entertainment forum
NEW YORK (AP) -- "The Path to 9/11" will break your heart. It will leave you unnerved, even more than before. And angrier than ever.

A five-hour miniseries that dramatizes a decade's worth of events leading up to the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, this film is plenty gripping. It doesn't forgo artistry for polemics.

Even so, it drives home, step by step, a message any viewer can understand: The people in charge of keeping you safe failed the nation monumentally. Systemically. Shamefully. And continue to, five years after what should have been a terribly sufficient wake-up call.

Until the Clintons got involved
Top officials of the Clinton administration have launched a preemptive strike against an ABC-TV "docudrama," slated to air Sunday and Monday, that they say includes made-up scenes depicting them as undermining attempts to kill Osama bin Laden.

Former secretary of state Madeleine K. Albright called one scene involving her "false and defamatory." Former national security adviser Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger said the film "flagrantly misrepresents my personal actions." And former White House aide Bruce R. Lindsey, who now heads the William J. Clinton Foundation, said: "It is unconscionable to mislead the American public about one of the most horrendous tragedies our country has ever known."
Washington Post

Would that be the same Madeline not-so-bright that handed Kim Jung Il nukes?
The same Sandy burglar that stole records from the Nat'l Archives, in his underwear & socks?

Bill is is demanding the network "pull the drama" if changes aren't made
 
Just one of many movies about 9/11.

Here's another coming soon to a theater near you:

"The Falling Man" tells the story of the photograph and all the 'jumpers' of 9/11. It follows the trail of the photographer who nearly lost his life shooting the image; of the citizens who decried it, arguing that it was sensational and exploitative; of the editors who published it and then reluctantly banned it; and of the journalist who committed himself to uncovering the falling man's identity.
Rated: [ PG ] MILD THEMES, INFREQUENT MILD COARSE LANGUAGE
DVD release: 7 Sep 2006
Director: Henry Singer
Running time: 80 mins
 
When our former failed President gets involved with shutting down the airing for that movie, it'll be noteworthy.
 
..seen here from afar.

A wee bit sensationalistic, dontcha think?

The family of the guy who this is supposed to be is ticked at the assumption. They're religious and the thought that their son committed suicide and is facing eternal damnation is ticking them off.
 
Well, let's see.

Clinton is not a sitting President.
Clinton has a mountain of evidence to show the facts of this movie are acurate.
Clinton & his staff made fatal errors in judgement which have been swept under the rug by the media.
Sandy Berger is a thief. What did he take & when do he know it?
Clinton is not killed.
 
The Bush gets whacked movie as about where the country is going if it follows the path currently set in motion. Happens in the future...pure conjecture. Similar to 1984.

The 9/11 movie is about pointing fingers... it was all <insert person here>'s fault. It happens in the past..pure hindsight and conjecture.

The Jumper movie is about some guy who jumped from the towers, the guy who took the picture and why it got pulled from the airwaves and newspapers. Old news being rehashed to make money. Pure greed and conjecture.

They're pretty damn close actually.
 
Both of you, actually. Suddenly you're both standing on the opposite side of the fence.
Actually, I think that both Gonz and I think that these movies are pretty stupid ideas and getting more press from the 'enraged' and 'offended' than from their actual worth as movies (cinematography, acting, plot, dialogue).
 
The Bush gets whacked movie as about where the country is going if it follows the path currently set in motion. Happens in the future...pure conjecture. Similar to 1984.

Nineteen Eighty-Four didn't forsee Reagan & didn't use Truman as the model. Using a live target is improper.
 
Both of you, actually. Suddenly you're both standing on the opposite side of the fence.

I think what Gonz is saying is that movies depicting Clinton badly (The Path to 9/11) are good movies depicting Bush badly (Farhenheit, Bush gets whacked) are bad.

Substitute Clinton and Bush with Carter and Reagan if you like.
 
I think what Gonz is saying is that movies depicting Clinton badly (The Path to 9/11) are good movies depicting Bush badly (Farhenheit, Bush gets whacked) are bad.

Substitute Clinton and Bush with Carter and Reagan if you like.
:toast:
 
Shit .... Spike and Gonz agreeing on something. The Muslims were only a week off ..... the end is neer.
 
I suppose sarcasm doesn't come across very well if one doesn't include the :rolleyes: smilie or the [sarcasm] tag
 
This was funny when a fat former Prezident & his half-witted semi-Jew Secretary of State & their buddy the bumbling thief were pissing & moaning but now it's gone into the land of fascism.

Press Release of Senator Reid
SENATE DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP URGES DISNEY CEO TO CANCEL MISLEADING 9/11 MINISERIES


Thursday, September 7, 2006



Washington, DC — Urging him to cancel the grossly inaccurate upcoming miniseries The Path to 9/11, the Senate Democratic Leadership today sent the following letter to Disney President and CEO Robert Iger. Disney’s subsidiary ABC erroneously claims the misleading miniseries is based on 9/11 Commission report and is planning to air it on September 10 and 11. Shockingly, the network is also planning to use the program as a teaching tool through Scholastic, potentially misinforming thousands of children about the most important event in recent American history.

The text of the letter, signed by Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, Assistant Democratic Leader Dick Durbin, and Senators Debbie Stabenow, Charles Schumer, and Byron Dorgan, is below.



September 7, 2006


Mr. Robert A. Iger

President and CEO

The Walt Disney Company

500 South Buena Vista Street

Burbank CA 91521


Dear Mr. Iger,


We write with serious concerns about the planned upcoming broadcast of The Path to 9/11 mini-series on September 10 and 11. Countless reports from experts on 9/11 who have viewed the program indicate numerous and serious inaccuracies that will undoubtedly serve to misinform the American people about the tragic events surrounding the terrible attacks of that day. Furthermore, the manner in which this program has been developed, funded, and advertised suggests a partisan bent unbecoming of a major company like Disney and a major and well respected news organization like ABC. We therefore urge you to cancel this broadcast to cease Disney’s plans to use it as a teaching tool in schools across America through Scholastic. Presenting such deeply flawed and factually inaccurate misinformation to the American public and to children would be a gross miscarriage of your corporate and civic responsibility to the law, to your shareholders, and to the nation.


The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest. Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in the duty of broadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting an open and accurate discussion of political ideas and events.


Disney and ABC claim this program to be based on the 9/11 Commission Report and are using that assertion as part of the promotional campaign for it. The 9/11 Commission is the most respected American authority on the 9/11 attacks, and association with it carries a special responsibility. Indeed, the very events themselves on 9/11, so tragic as they were, demand extreme care by any who attempt to use those events as part of an entertainment or educational program. To quote Steve McPhereson, president of ABC Entertainment, “When you take on the responsibility of telling the story behind such an important event, it is absolutely critical that you get it right.”


Unfortunately, it appears Disney and ABC got it totally wrong.


Despite claims by your network’s representatives that The Path to 9/11 is based on the report of the 9/11 Commission, 9/11 Commissioners themselves, as well as other experts on the issues, disagree.



Richard Ben-Veniste, speaking for himself and fellow 9/11 Commissioners who recently viewed the program, said, “As we were watching, we were trying to think how they could have misinterpreted the 9/11 Commission’s findings the way that they had.” [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]

Richard Clarke, the former counter-terrorism czar, and a national security advisor to ABC has described the program as “deeply flawed” and said of the program’s depiction of a Clinton official hanging up on an intelligence agent, “It’s 180 degrees from what happened.” [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]

Reports suggest that an FBI agent who worked on 9/11 and served as a consultant to ABC on this program quit halfway through because, “he thought they were making things up.” [MSNBC, September 7, 2006]

Even Thomas Kean, who serves as a paid consultant to the miniseries, has admitted that scenes in the film are fictionalized. [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]
That Disney would seek to broadcast an admittedly and proven false recounting of the events of 9/11 raises serious questions about the motivations of its creators and those who approved the deeply flawed program. Finally, that Disney plans to air commercial-free a program that reportedly cost it $40 million to produce serves to add fuel to these concerns.


These concerns are made all the more pressing by the political leaning of and the public statements made by the writer/producer of this miniseries, Mr. Cyrus Nowrasteh, in promoting this miniseries across conservative blogs and talk shows.


Frankly, that ABC and Disney would consider airing a program that could be construed as right-wing political propaganda on such a grave and important event involving the security of our nation is a discredit both to the Disney brand and to the legacy of honesty built at ABC by honorable individuals from David Brinkley to Peter Jennings. Furthermore, that Disney would seek to use Scholastic to promote this misguided programming to American children as a substitute for factual information is a disgrace.


As 9/11 Commission member Jamie Gorelick said, “It is critically important to the safety of our nation that our citizens, and particularly our school children, understand what actually happened and why – so that we can proceed from a common understanding of what went wrong and act with unity to make our country safer.”


Should Disney allow this programming to proceed as planned, the factual record, millions of viewers, countless schoolchildren, and the reputation of Disney as a corporation worthy of the trust of the American people and the United States Congress will be deeply damaged. We urge you, after full consideration of the facts, to uphold your responsibilities as a respected member of American society and as a beneficiary of the free use of the public airwaves to cancel this factually inaccurate and deeply misguided program. We look forward to hearing back from you soon.



Sincerely,


Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid

Assistant Democratic Leader Dick Durbin

Senator Debbie Stabenow

Senator Charles Schumer

Senator Byron Dorgan



###

Threatening to scre with their license over a movie? Communist tactics are back & they resides in the (D) headquarters.

Heads had better roll over this & they damn well better not be at Disney.
 
The silence is overwhelming.

A letter to Bob Iger of ABC from a Clinton lawyer
Dear Bob,

Despite press reports that ABC/Disney has made changes in the content and marketing of "The Path to 9/11," we remailn concerned about the false impression that airing the show will leave on the public. Labelng the show as "fiction" does not meet your responsibility to the victims of the September 11th attacks, their families, the hard work of the 9/11 Commission, or to the American people as a whole.

At a moment when we should be debating how to make the nation safer by implementing the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission, "The Path to 9/11" calls into question the accuracy of the Commission's report and whether fabricated scenes are, in fact, an accurate portrayal of history. Indeed, the millions spent on the production of this fictional drama would have been better spent informing the public about the Commission's actual findings and the many recommendations that have yet to be acted upon. Unlike this film, that would have been a tremendous service to the public.

Although our request for an advance copy of the film has been repeatedly denied, it is all too clear that our objections to "The Path to 9/11" are valid and corroborated by those familiar with the film and intimately involved in its production.

-- Your corporate partner, Scholastic, has disassociated itself from this proect.

-- 9/11 Commission Chairman Thomas Kean, who served as co-executive producer on "The Path to 9/11," has stated that he raised concerns about the accuracy of several scenes in the film and that his concerns were not addressed during production.

-- Harvey Keitel, who plays the star role of FBI agent John O'Neill, told reporters yesterday that while the screenplay was presented to him as a fair treatment of historical events, he is upset that several scenes were simply invented for dramatic purposes.

-- Numerous Members of Congress, several 9/11 Commissioners and prominent historians have spoken out against this movie.

-- Indeed, according to press reports, the fact that you are still editing the film two days before it is scheduled to air is an admission that it is irreparably flawed.

As a nation, we need to be focused on preventing another attack, not fictionalizing the last one for television ratings. "The Path to 9/11" not only tarnishes the work of the 9/11 Commission, but also cheapens the fith anniversary of what was a very painful moment in history for all Americans. We expect that you will make the responsible decision to not air this film.

Sincerely,

Bruce R. Lindsey
Chief Executive Officer
William J. Clinton Foundation

Douglas J. Band
Counselor to President Clinton
Office of William Jefferson Clinton

Threats abound. So do eye witnesses saying what's in the movie is accurate.
 
Back
Top