flavio
Banned
PuterTutor said:Yep, their oil wells were fine, only the PEOPLE of the country were getting NO benefit from them at all. Now they will.
Not if they burn up.
PuterTutor said:Yep, their oil wells were fine, only the PEOPLE of the country were getting NO benefit from them at all. Now they will.
PuterTutor said:That's why we're talking about it, Flav. That's why we care. Do you understand that?
flavio said:What do we care? Oil has nothing to do with it.
Maybe that's what you're saying now, but that's certainly not what you said.flavio said:I'm saying that we knew these things would burn up as part of our kill, destroy, liberate action. Do you understand that?
Now, if you had actually started out in this thread by vocalising your feelings that we are partly or wholly responsible for the burning oil wells, simply because we knew it was a likely reaction to our attack, then we could have debated that topic. That viewpoint certainly has merrit, and perhaps a reasonable discussion could have followed.What do we care? Oil has nothing to do with it.
flavio said:Bite me.
Really trying to make the most out my sarcastic remark aren't you?
I respond in like kind, but I'm rarely the one to start the downward spiral. PT is correct, sometimes you jump into a thread determined to argue against someone, not what they say. So yeah, I think making the most out of your sarcastic comment might do some good, if it brings that to your attention.flavio said:That couldn't be it, because OLI throws around more insults than most people here.
That would make him a hypocrit.
flavio said:You have often been the one to start slinging unprovoked insults around.
Determined to insult someone not debate.