AlphaTroll
New Member
How would that have benefited her Gato? She was arrested and put in jail for whatever reason, so she would automatically lose any child support & the child would be placed in care of the state until such time that a custody hearing can be held & proper arrangements made for the child.
By keeping silent about the child (and basically signing a death notice) she'd only serve to increase the time she spends in jail. So I don't see how she could view it as a money issue? Or how she would benefit in any way?
Oh & they were seperated, not divorced anyway, thus child support wouldn't be a question as it is only payable if the parents are divorced or if the court orders it.
Bish: Your thread title "This makes me sick! (An example of why custody shouldn't automatically go to women)" is not entirely true IMO - she didn't have custody of the child as an arrangement by a court of law - it was more a case of the father not living there anymore due to seperation and she was denying him access.
But yeah - this woman is sick & needs to be locked away for good.
By keeping silent about the child (and basically signing a death notice) she'd only serve to increase the time she spends in jail. So I don't see how she could view it as a money issue? Or how she would benefit in any way?
Oh & they were seperated, not divorced anyway, thus child support wouldn't be a question as it is only payable if the parents are divorced or if the court orders it.
Bish: Your thread title "This makes me sick! (An example of why custody shouldn't automatically go to women)" is not entirely true IMO - she didn't have custody of the child as an arrangement by a court of law - it was more a case of the father not living there anymore due to seperation and she was denying him access.
But yeah - this woman is sick & needs to be locked away for good.