That's the way I use it too.unclehobart said:I don't have a problem with the scanners so long as everything I have is a scannable item. I won't go near it if I have produce to weigh.
tonksy said:there are just certain things i like to have a live person take care of.
tonksy said:when i go to the store i don't want to concern myself with the code for parsnips, that's their job. also, the usacn has a fit if you don't place you item in the bag. well...what if i don't want to? and the cash always gets hung up on the inside. i'd just as soon go to a live person (or the closest thing to that i can find) and have them do it. there are just certain things i like to have a live person take care of.
Gato_Solo said:3. You're making humans more dependent on machines. Now I like my stuff as much as the next person, but I could actually survive without it. How many others could say the same?
Luis G said:We can survive without the internet, computers, cell phones, cars, tv, etc etc.
They are all superfluous items, but we are so used to them that they have become a need.
Gato_Solo said:That's where you're wrong, Luis G. They aren't needed at all.
Luis G said:That's what I said, need as in the context of "wanting those" not "being essential".
..Luis G said:we are so used to them that they have become a need.
It doesn't have to be in the bag... it just has to be on the scale that the bags are on. You can put them next to the bags and you'll be fine. It works via weight.tonksy said:the usacn has a fit if you don't place you item in the bag. well...what if i don't want to?
Gonz said:or whatever your local store calls its equivalence...
I have one request...If you aren't smart enough to check yourself out without the "overseer" visiting you more than once...shoot yourself.
*walks away mumbling something about moronic wal-mart shoppers*