chcr
Too cute for words
Ahh.Lopan said:The extremists. I was talking about the people in the editorial.
Ahh.Lopan said:The extremists. I was talking about the people in the editorial.
chcr said:By the way, can I get the ticket concession to the "liberals heads exploding" thing? I've got a feeling it'll be like a license to print money.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/li...tml?in_article_id=358382&in_page_id=1770&ct=5
An extreme Muslim cleric whose family have been living on benefits in Britain for 20 years says it would not be 'fair' to deport him. Speaking after the Prime Minister announced his clampdown, father-of-seven Sheik Omar Bakri said: "I have wives, children, sons-in-law, daughters-in-law. It would be hard on my family if I was deported."
Since Syrian-born Bakri settled in Britain, he and his extended family have raked in benefits amounting to at least £300,000 ($530,000 USD).
He is registered disabled because of an injury to his leg during his childhood, and was recently supplied with a £31,000 ($55,000 USD) Ford Galaxy under the Motability scheme.
Bakri, who lives in a £200,000 ($355,000 USD) home in North London, tops up his £250-a-week benefit payments with an extra £50 incapacity allowance.
He has praised the September 11 terrorists as 'magnificent', called Israel 'a cancer' and said homosexuals should be 'thrown from Big Ben'.
In January, he declared that Britain had become a 'land of war', and called on Muslims to unite behind Al Qaeda. He has supported suicide bombings and urged his followers to kill non-Muslims ' wherever, whenever'.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1724923,00.html
"DURING a two-month undercover investigation The Sunday Times has amassed hours of taped evidence and pages of transcripts which show how Bakri and his acolytes promote hatred of “non-believers” and “egg” their followers on to commit acts of violence, including suicide bombings. The evidence details how his group, the Saviour Sect, preaches a racist creed of Muslim supremacy which, in the words of Bakri, aims at one day “flying the Islamic flag over Downing Street”.
Gonz said:Just because you disagree doesn't make it wrong.
Gonz said:No, because I'm always right
Alzheimers?chcr said:Wonder why I keep forgetting that?
BeardofPants said:Alzheimers?
Islamic extremists who incite violence or praise suicide attacks in Britain could face charges of treason, it emerged yesterday.
Abu Uzair, a former member of al-Muhajiroun who is now believed to be involved with its successor organisation, the Saviour Sect, said on BBC's Newsnight that after the July 7 attacks "the banner has been raised for jihad inside the UK". He said that Muslims had abandoned a "covenant of security" saying they should not resort to violence in Britain because they were not under threat.
"We don't live in peace with you any more, which means the covenant of security no longer exists," he said.
BeardofPants said:Alzheimers?
Psst....you have 1.5 million Muslims in your back yard, buddy and a president who is constantly stating "Our Muslim friends" like a mantra. Sounds like appeasment to me.The Other One said:Canadians don't have anything to worry about from their Muslim brethren.
After all, they already are in their back yard; Canada has welcomed them with open arms and open minds, and the Islamics haven't bit the hand that has appeased them yet.
MrBishop said:Psst....you have 1.5 million Muslims in your back yard, buddy and a president who is constantly stating "Our Muslim friends" like a mantra. Sounds like appeasment to me.
MrBishop said:Psst....you have 1.5 million Muslims in your back yard, buddy and a president who is constantly stating "Our Muslim friends" like a mantra. Sounds like appeasment to me.
MrBishop said:Ok...T.O.O.
What's your plan for the new USA? How do you (our newly elected leader) solve the 'terrorism' issue? Which steps are you willing to take?
Naturalization Oath of Allegiance
to the United States of America
"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the armed forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."
And I am curious, if I may ask: How do you Canadians keep from getting killed by the Muslims in your country?
End all signs of rhetorical respect for all things Muslim, including the refusal to say the words "Islamic Terrorism" "Muslim Terrorism" and "Jihad".
The Islamist preacher Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed, who left Britain for Lebanon at the weekend after learning he could face incitement charges, will be banned from returning if he fails to come back before the end of the month.
Mr Bakri, the former leader of the Islamist group al-Muhajiroun, said yesterday that he was enjoying a holiday with his mother in Beirut and still hoped to return to London to his family.
The deputy prime minister, John Prescott, urged Mr Bakri to stay away. "I just say 'enjoy your holiday, make it a long one'," he said, adding that the preacher, who currently has indefinite leave to remain in Britain, had committed no offence by leaving the country.
Absolutely. Tell me I could go to Mexico, for instance, and everyone would fall all over themselves to find english speaking police or government officials for me.LEARN THE LANGUAGE. IT'S ENGLISH
Biggest non-issue in the history of history. Strictly a manufactured issue. Who cares? Why?and FLAG BURNING
Ahh, the first bloom of fascism. I can remember when this was still America, can you?and ANTI-WAR PROTESTERS will not be tolerated.
2 things....1) It isn't in effect, nor is it likely to be soon. 2) Jews are allowed to face a Jewish court with religious laws in effect, why not Muslims. Doesn't change Canadian laws one whit.. they still wouldn't be able to 'stone women in the streets' - it does, on the other hand, allow for a 'jury of peers'.The Other One said:So does adopting Sharia law
Like it or not, Canada and the USA are attached at the hip. What affects one often affects the other.The Other One said:I forget: when you say "our" how are you one of the U.S.A. again? You think America will defend you after the Muslims decide your morals are corrupt since you have legalized gay marriage and so they want to chop your heads off, and that makes you one of us by proximity?
Because the word has as many connotations and in the context of the phrase "War on terrorism" has even more. Terrorism isn't a country. Terrorism is a mind-set, and as such...pretty much invisible until its too late. I used quotes because the term is overly used , especially preceeded by "War on.."The Other One said:When you put the word terrorism in between apostrophes, does that mean that you don't take its' threat seriously?
We try not to illegally invade Muslim countries Works so far.The Other One said:And I am curious, if I may ask: How do you Canadians keep from getting killed by the Muslims in your country? Is there some sort of spell you cast over them? I'm serious, because your country has its' share of radical imams. Does the cold weather lower their metabolism and they're too busy looking for a warm rock to lie on to think about smiting your necks? What is the current Canadian theory for maintaining status quo?
I don't remember Canada saying any such thing. Some Canadians might've said it...then again, some Americans said so as well.The Other One said:And if I may poke further: when 9-11 happened, Canada said the U.S. deserved it because of our foriegn policies, that we brought it on ourselves because America is a bully. So 4 years later has the opinion changed? Let me guess: a bigger % of Canadians believe we still deserved it, right?