Especially if you like eating beaverProfessur said:A one helluva hunting season.
TexasRaceLady said:That list gives one pause --- think how "far" we've come in just 100 years. Of course, there are things I don't think have "improved" since 1904.
My grandmother was born in 1900. It boggled my mind when she died in 1988 that she'd seen the entire span of powered flight --- from the birth of the airplane to the flight to the moon.
I was born in 1946 --- I remember the absolute wonder of air conditioning in a private home! And even more wonderful -- actually buying a car with AC!!!! Do any of you remember the clear vinyl seat covers that you stuck to in the summer? LOL
Actually having to get up to change the channel on the TV --- of course, having only 3 channels made it easy to select.
Gato_Solo said:When I was growing up, our TV had 2 remote controls. Me, or my brother...depending upon who was at home at the time. We were also the answering machines...
I remember that. Of course there were only three or four channels.Gato_Solo said:When I was growing up, our TV had 2 remote controls. Me, or my brother...depending upon who was at home at the time. We were also the answering machines...
is a term that white men would use to refer to black slaves, full grown men as well.Luis G said:why?
tonksy said:is a term that white men would use to refer to black slaves, full grown men as well.
SouthernN'Proud said:Why does it all have to be traced back to black and white every time?
Gato_Solo said:For the same reason the term 'Ebonics' comes up when the education system is lampooned.
i only explained that facet because it was the only one appropriate to the conversation.SouthernN'Proud said:Some white men use the term to refer to any other male. I hear it routinely. It's not racial. Fewer things are than many think are. Pretty much everything is racial now, whether it really is or not. 'Tis what we have wrought. Now we get to live with it.
The use of the term "boy" in the presence of another fully grown man can have many derivations. Yes, in rare instances it can be a holdover from the civil rights struggle and before. It can be a backlash against the 60's term "man" that got interjected in every sentence by a younger generation some on here may identify with. It can be a derrogatory term, meaning the one being spoken to isn't considered to be as "manly" as the speaker. It can be as innocent a little interjection as the word "like" is.
Why does it all have to be traced back to black and white every time?
SouthernN'Proud said:OK, fair enough I suppose. Though ebonics has actually been added to curriculums in some schools. Then again, I suppose the whole black/white debate has been too....
SnP said:Hand me that brick there, wouldya? Time to get started again.
We had a thread that kinda talked about what OTC would look like in 100 years. (Either that or it was yet another thread that got highjacked).Spirit said:Hasn't anyone wondered........ will OTC still be here??????