You can continue to tell this lie but that does not make it the truth nor you a truth teller.
The evidence shows that an actual rape did occur.
No question about that.
There are witnesses to some of these acts.
No question about that.
There are photographs of acts being performed.
No question about that.
In the Duke LaCrosse player case, there was no evidence that an actual rape occurred.
No question about that.
The DA lost his license to practice and resigned in disgrace.
No question about that.
How is a statement of fact a conviction? How is a statement of fact a declaration of guilt?
The witnesses will state the same thing that I have in court -- an actual rape occurred. They will tell it before a courtroom in which the accused sits
ACCUSED but not
CONVICTED. He will not be
GUILTY until declared so by a jury of his peers, at which time that fact will be public record.
In the case of the Mormons, they were never arrested. They were never charged. They were never tried. They were never brought before the bar of justice. They were never declared guilty by a jury of their peers.
You, on the other hand, declared them guilty right out of the box. The only way you would have come to their defense would have been if they were Muslims.
A court of law ruled that their children were taken illegally and they were ordered returned. That must have been quite a disappointment to you, huh.