What's in a name?

jimpeel

Well-Known Member
It seems that the DYFS workers have never heard the song "A Boy Named Sue" so they are taking the kids based on what may occur in the future to the kids because of their names.

Reminds me of the episode of "Cheers" where Carla's family name the first born son after the grandfather's first name and the grandmother's maiden name. It turned out that grandpa's name was "Benito" and grandma's maiden name was "Mussolini".

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,479904,00.html

Young 'Adolf Hitler' and Two Sisters Removed From Home

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

A 3-year-old boy named Adolf Hitler and his two Nazi-named younger sisters were removed from their New Jersey home last week and placed in state custody, police said.

Adolf Hitler Campbell and his sisters, JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell and Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell, were taken from their Holland Township, N.J., home on Friday by the state's Division of Youth and Family Services (DYFS), Sgt. John Harris of the Holland Township Police Department told FOXNews.com.

Their father, Heath Campbell, is expected in court Thursday in Flemington, N.J., in connection with the case.

Kate Bernyk, a spokeswoman for the DYFS, said confidentiality laws barred her from commenting on the case or even confirming that the Campbell children were involved.

"DYFS has their reasons and they normally don’t release any information, so we kind of have to go on faith with them," Harris said. Police were not told what the agency was investigating.

"I’ve dealt with the family for years and as far as the children are concerned, I have never had any reports of any abuse with the children," Harris said. "As far as I know, he’s always been very good with the children."

Speaking generally, Bernyk said the state's "decision to remove a child is based on the safety and well being of the child and the risk to that child, and that decision is made in conjunction with the courts and the county family court judge."

The Campbells made national news last month when a ShopRite supermarket refused to sell them a birthday cake with Adolf Hitler's name on it. The story generated a slew of angry Internet chatter.

Forensic psychologist N.G. Berrill said naming a boy Hitler (or Sue? - j) could be considered child abuse.

"Part of it is the infantile nature of the parents’ behavior," Berrill said. "You can name your dog something weird, but they think they’re making some kind of bold statement with the children, not appreciating that the children will have separate lives and will be looked at in a negative light until they’re able to change their name. It is abuse."

Last year, a New Zealand court removed a 9-year-old girl from her parents in order to change her birth name: Talula Does The Hula From Hawaii. In that country, officials do not deem a name abusive unless it causes serious bullying.

Heath Campbell told the Easton-Express Times last year that he named his son after Adolf Hitler because he liked it and "no one else in the world would have that name."

A paper to be published in March in Social Sciences Journal by economists David E. Kalist and Daniel Y. Lee of Shippensburg University found that unpopular first names, when mixed with factors like a disadvantaged home life, can increase the tendency toward juvenile delinquency.

Lee told FOXNews.com that Adolf and Hitler were not names they looked at for the study.

"Hitler most likely would be an unpopular name in the sense that not many people name their children with a name [like Hitler], but we didn’t particularly look at particularly bad names like that," he said.

New Jersey officials said Wednesday that it is not just a matter of names.

"DYFS would never remove a child simply based on that child's name," Bernyk said.
 
It seems that the DYFS workers have never heard the song "A Boy Named Sue" so they are taking the kids based on what may occur in the future to the kids because of their names.

It says they wouldn't remove a kid based on their name and that the police don't know the reasons.
 
It says they wouldn't remove a kid based on their name and that the police don't know the reasons.

I am guessing it was the names. Even if they say it was something else, it was the names.

I know many people hate them, but I think this is the reason you guys have the ACLU
 
I believe that when this is aired that it will be charged that the parents endangered the kids by giving them names that other kooks might want to harm them. Just my .02
 
My bet is that the parents were indoctrinating their kids with racist ideology. Little "Hitler's' first word being n****r and his sister knowing how to pop a sweet 'seig heil' before she was 1yr old.
 
My bet is that the parents were indoctrinating their kids with racist ideology. Little "Hitler's' first word being n****r and his sister knowing how to pop a sweet 'seig heil' before she was 1yr old.

They are the parents & they have a right to raise their kids in their fashion.no matter how fucked up it is.
 
...there are several varieties of child abuse. There's 'raising you kids' like you and I see it, and then there's 'raising your kids' that's too fucked up to be allowed to continue.
 
Laws...ok

Guidelines....hell no. A pamphlet with opinions will be the decision maker?
 
The judge?

pontiac-gto-judge-1969b.jpg
 
Off hand...the judge will be the judge. :shrug:

So, we're going to randomly place someones child(ren) in potential jeopardy because someone else thought they were possibly harming them.

The names are stupid. However, they aren't my kids & the parents have a right to incorrectly raise their children. Happens all the time. We need to mind our own business unless there's a significant probability of death, disfigurement or physical abuse.
 
Kids given Nazi names seized by a Nazi state agency.

What's next? Soon they'll be rounding up kids named Mao, Mohammed, Kim, Joe, Hugo, and perhaps, Hussein??
 
Back
Top