WMD? Who needs WMD?

it depends if you actually identify the term with yourself or not. you'd prefer not to be described a conservative, i see no reason not to extend the same consideration to those who prefer labels not added to them.
 
Ardsgaine said:
I'm still waiting for him to explain to me what's wrong with being called a socialist. Isn't socialism supposed to be good?
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter whether it's bad or good. You may prefer that I not label you as a woman, even though there is nothing wrong with being a woman.

You're having muvh more trouble with this than is necessary.

outside looking in said:
You can call me a pro-pollution
Click to expand...

Libertarians sure do love their pollution don't they.
 
Oh buddy, you better believe it! :D

Just thought I'd toss you some scraps to have fun with. ;) In reality, I'm as aware as everyone else of the dangers of excessive pollution; I simply don't think there is the appropriate level of technological sophistication yet to deal with the problem economically. Why spend a billion dollars today when that money spent on research could ultimately solve the problem sooner and cost less in total?

Or something like that... sounds good on paper at least. :)
 
outside looking in said:
In reality, I'm as aware as everyone else of the dangers of excessive pollution; I simply don't think there is the appropriate level of technological sophistication yet to deal with the problem economically. Why spend a billion dollars today when that money spent on research could ultimately solve the problem sooner and cost less in total?
Click to expand...

It's the difference between coming up with technological solutions vs. abandoning technology altogether. Environmentalists want to do the latter.
 
April 7 — U.S. military forces in Iraq were reported Monday to have uncovered at least two caches of what may be banned chemical weapons — barrels of chemicals buried outside an agriculture compound near Karbala and medium-range rockets found in a warehouse south of Baghdad. Senior Pentagon officials reacted cautiously, saying the preliminary positive tests have not been confirmed and noting that previous reports about possible chemical weapons had turned out to be unfounded.
Click to expand...

Source...

[size=large]Please read the entire article before responding[/size]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top