catocom
Well-Known Member
the problem is...you are confusing teabaggers with teapartiers.
If you won't see the difference, then there no help for you.
Taxes at Lowest Levels in 60 Years
- Thread starter spike
- Start date
the problem is...you are confusing teabaggers with teapartiers.
If you won't see the difference, then there no help for you.
spike
New Member
How do you figure? 44% of teapartiers think taxes have risen.
ResearchMonkey
Well-Known Member
If your saying high unemployment has the government underfunded, well then we agree.
catocom
Well-Known Member
you won't believe my numbers, and I don't believe yours.
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree there.
ResearchMonkey
Well-Known Member
spike
New Member
That's a different subject which might be interesting. We were talking about taxes being the lowest in 60 years and going down for 98% of America though.
spike
New Member
The 44% was from a recent poll. I'm not sure which numbers of yours you think I don't believe?
catocom
Well-Known Member
By you posting your source of the numbers , you obviously believe those numbers and sources,
therefore by deduction, if I post a source, and numbers to the contrary,
it stands to reason that you won't believe those numbers.
I will say, there's quite a difference though, to the contrary.
Don't drink the flavor-aide man.
Just like trying to label these groups of groups, that Is the grass root,
it's a juggernaut, and all those attempts will prove to be futile.
Politicians are going to have to get in line, or get out.
Obama said "bring it", and it's coming.
Careful what you ask for.
spike
New Member
Actually if you have some numbers to the contrary, please post them.
I'm not sure what you're saying here.
Get in line with what?
What's coming?
You seem to be making a lot of vague claims that don't make much sense. Could you get a little more specific and maybe use some facts?
spike
New Member
Right, you haven't and you wont. So you're claim that I won't believe your numbers was false since you don't have any.
Not sure what that has to do with this conversation. Irrelevant vague stuff again.
Also, you ignored most of my questions from my previous post.
spike
New Member
What schedule? Again this seems like vague bizarre randomness.
I'm not sure why you would even bother posting if you never want to clarify exactly what you're trying to say.
Let's backtrack:
1. Actually if you have some numbers to the contrary, please post them.
2. Get in line with what?
3. What's coming?
4. Difference from what? To the contrary of what?
spike
New Member
I'd receive it fine if you could just quit being vague and answer a couple questions.
There again with the vague made up crap. I try and have a rational discussion and you just keep saying random stuff like "the moon poppies are in bloom" or some other such nonsense.
Here's a concept maybe you could try to grasp. Talk in clear language with facts that back up what you're saying. That way people can have a real discussion with you.
If you want to talk about some seeds being planted specify what seeds you're talking about.
If you want to talk about something coming, specify what it is you believe to be coming and why.
If you want to talk about politicians needing to get in line specify what they are supposed to be getting in line with and why you think they have to do it.
If you don't think the numbers from a poll are real specify why.
This would make it so an actual discussion could take place instead of just random trippy meaningless vague sentences.
spike
New Member
It's no fun being concise so other people know what you're saying? I would think it wouldn't be much fun to post meaningless stuff. Seems like a waste of time to me.
I just like to try to drive you sane sometimes, but one of us ain't gonna make the grade.
Yeah, sure. The mad bomber what bombs at midnight is consorting with the cheeses.
So anywho. 44% of tea partiers believe taxes have gone up. Why do you suppose that is?
catocom
Well-Known Member
no more a waste than playing video games.
Just because You can't make anything out of what I'm saying, doesn't mean
nobody else can't either.
continuing to say 44% blah blah blah, doesn't make it true.
Have you priced hamburger meat, chicken, pork, and other meats lately?
Have you notice any price change there in the last 3 months?
Because a direct tax on the 'little people' hasn't be imposed Yet, doesn't
mean there isn't a proxy effect.
So taking the proxy into account, and how a certain poll question is Asked,
one can spin the numbers in many ways.
There, hows that? any more clear?
Just because You can't make anything out of what I'm saying, doesn't mean
nobody else can't either.
continuing to say 44% blah blah blah, doesn't make it true.
Have you priced hamburger meat, chicken, pork, and other meats lately?
Have you notice any price change there in the last 3 months?
Because a direct tax on the 'little people' hasn't be imposed Yet, doesn't
mean there isn't a proxy effect.
So taking the proxy into account, and how a certain poll question is Asked,
one can spin the numbers in many ways.
There, hows that? any more clear?
spike
New Member
I don't know about that. Playing video games can have all sort of benefits according to studies.
You don't really say anything often times. Politicians need to get line? Unless you are willing to mention what you think they need to get in line with and why you think they need to do it the statement is meaningless.
Those were the results of the poll. Adding "blah blah blah" doesn't change those results.
Yes, I bought ground turkey at $2 a pound today. Great deal.
The question here was whether Obama has increased taxes.
That doesn't leave any room for speculating on meat prices.
Much better. Thanks!
ResearchMonkey
Well-Known Member
OoooOoooh GoooOOoooD!
I'm sure you can reason this to mean that it won't be a tax on the middle class.