Late term Abortion Doc Shot Dead

spike said:
Not the lake of fire! :laugh:

I'm not sure what gets you a seat in "hell" but i'd think shooting someone in a church would be asking for it.

Not carrying a baby to term to save the mother's life? Dunno.

Anywho, I do promote carrying babies to term. I'll just let other people make their own decisions.
Click to expand...

I promote letting wimmin live if they show their ankles in public. Plenty of other people think that's a stoning offence .... but we'll just let other people make their own decisions, eh?
 
Professur said:
I promote letting wimmin live if they show their ankles in public. Plenty of other people think that's a stoning offence .... but we'll just let other people make their own decisions, eh?
Click to expand...

I'm against hitting kids some people think not hitting them is spoiling them. Should I let them make their own decisions?
 
Well, frankly, I see the gulf between spanking a disobedient child and administering a beating as being at least as large as the gulf between late term abortions and birthing the baby and immediately giving it up for adoption.

I think that parents should be allowed to spank, but not to the extent that it causes injury. Even leaving a handprint is too much. More than one swat is too much. Any contact in anger is too much. Pretty strict limits on spanking, doncha think? Personally, I feel that a child takes far more personal damage from a lecture on his inadequacy than from getting the seat of his pants dusted. A swat on the pants is .. "you did bad, it's over, don't do it again." A lecture will roll about in his head for days, if it makes any impression at all.
 
The cause is completely different. One is some left over religious fundamentalism and one isn't.
 
I wouldn't think people get abortions because of religious fundamentalism. Unless maybe there's some "out of wedlock" shame maybe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top