America- the new Roman Empire?

HGHWman said:
Traditionaly America has acted as a big brother protecting the weaker one. God forbid there would be an economic colapse, if the American economy implodes or no longer becomes viable the effect would be world wide, not a regional colapse.
Click to expand...

Somehow, after having seen how often the Free Trade Agreement has been overlooked or twisted against Canada in trade disputes in order to secure American interests, I seriously doubt that 'protecting the weaker' is the primary goal of America as a Big Brother. Closer to the 1984 version, IMO.

If Pax America is used benevolently AND it's sustainable :shrug:

If it's not sustainable then...Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
 
MrBishop said:
Somehow, after having seen how often the Free Trade Agreement has been overlooked or twisted against Canada in trade disputes in order to secure American interests, I seriously doubt that 'protecting the weaker' is the primary goal of America as a Big Brother. Closer to the 1984 version, IMO.

If Pax America is used benevolently AND it's sustainable :shrug:

If it's not sustainable then...Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Click to expand...

There is no such thing as a benevolent government. You ought to know that by now. :rolleyes:
 
Gato_Solo said:
There is no such thing as a benevolent government. You ought to know that by now. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Isn't' that what Bush is suggesting?

We are all powerful,
we will fight to stay this way..
don't worry, we'll protect you.

Sounds good until the bill comes in.
 
MrBishop said:
Somehow, after having seen how often the Free Trade Agreement has been overlooked or twisted against Canada in trade disputes in order to secure American interests, I seriously doubt that 'protecting the weaker' is the primary goal of America as a Big Brother. Closer to the 1984 version, IMO.
Click to expand...


Then buy your shit somewere else..
Canada sets a fine example by selling it's subsidised lumber down here...
 
highwayman said:
Canada sets a fine example by selling it's subsidised lumber down here...
Click to expand...

At high tariffs...and additional fees imposed by...the USA.

After the DOC investigation ended in August 2001 the DOC imposed a duty of 19.31 percent on Canadian softwood lumber imports. The Bush Administration would later impose an additional duty of 12.57 percent that it called an "anti-dumping duty". The Canadian government appealed these duties to the World Trade Organization (WTO) which ruled in Canada's favor on May 27, 2003. However this ruling is non-binding so the American government was not forced to change any policies. The American government still has an opportunity to appeal this ruling. The case is being examined by the NAFTA dispute resolution body which can issue a ruling that is binding.

http://economics.about.com/cs/agriculture/a/softwood_lumber_2.htm
 
Clean your underwear before you tell me my back yard needs cleaning...


MrBishop said:
At high tariffs...and additional fees imposed by...the USA.

After the DOC investigation ended in August 2001 the DOC imposed a duty of 19.31 percent on Canadian softwood lumber imports. The Bush Administration would later impose an additional duty of 12.57 percent that it called an "anti-dumping duty". The Canadian government appealed these duties to the World Trade Organization (WTO) which ruled in Canada's favor on May 27, 2003. However this ruling is non-binding so the American government was not forced to change any policies. The American government still has an opportunity to appeal this ruling. The case is being examined by the NAFTA dispute resolution body which can issue a ruling that is binding.

http://economics.about.com/cs/agriculture/a/softwood_lumber_2.htm
Click to expand...
 
The point is, Highwayman...that charity begins at home. If the world thinks that Pax America will take care of the little guy (especially in something detrimental to the USA)... the world is mistaken.

If you think that America would take care of the little guy over it's own needs/wants..you are also delusional.

It's far too cushy at the 'top', eh.

*Yes, this also applies to all 1st world nations in regards to helping 3rd world nations.*
 
MrBishop said:
The point is, Highwayman...that charity begins at home. If the world thinks that Pax America will take care of the little guy (especially in something detrimental to the USA)... the world is mistaken.

If you think that America would take care of the little guy over it's own needs/wants..you are also delusional.

It's far too cushy at the 'top', eh.

*Yes, this also applies to all 1st world nations in regards to helping 3rd world nations.*
Click to expand...

Ahem....


highwayman said:
Clean your underwear before you tell me my back yard needs cleaning...
Click to expand...
 
chcr said:
In fact, the Roman Empire only imploded after it had been rotting away from the inside for some time, highway. I've been saying for years that we're doomed to a similar fate. Probably not in our lifetimes, but it will almost certainly happen. When the citizens are more concerned with their personal prerogatives than with the good of their nation, the end has already passed. Inertia and a lack of viable enemies will keep it going for a while, but eventually the US government will collapse under it's own weight.
Click to expand...

True dat.

And I chart the source of the problem back to the 60s as well...the 1860s.
 
SouthernN'Proud said:
True dat.

And I chart the source of the problem back to the 60s as well...the 1860s.
Click to expand...





You mean how we did not let you cede or the whole coming down to the South bit? I am not knitpicking, I am geniunely curious. And I do gotta wonder what Gonz will say about that :p
 
Indeed. I never bought the whole Roman Empire connection. We may be strong, but we certainly aren't alone. Collective EU Europe is on par with us. China is strong and can be a serious problem if they go nuts on the world. India, if it ever gets its head on straight, can be seriously powerful.
 
unclehobart said:
Indeed. I never bought the whole Roman Empire connection. We may be strong, but we certainly aren't alone. Collective EU Europe is on par with us. China is strong and can be a serious problem if they go nuts on the world. India, if it ever gets its head on straight, can be seriously powerful.
Click to expand...


Certainly it's a different world now but the similarities are still striking. It's not the same, I'll grant you but parallels can be drawn.

Contrary to popular belief though, there were powers in the world at the height of the Roman Empire to rival them. They dominated Europe though, and almost all of our version of history comes from Europe.
 
freako104 said:
You mean how we did not let you cede or the whole coming down to the South bit? I am not knitpicking, I am geniunely curious. And I do gotta wonder what Gonz will say about that :p
Click to expand...

Not here, not again. That sword what Damacles used to tote around is suspended appropriately.

PM me your specific areas of interest and I shall be more than enthralled to provide anything you like.
 
If we are following a Roman model, then I can't wait for the 'Ceasar' to cross the Rubicon and set up the dictatorial Pax Romana dictatorship. At least we should then have 2 generations of phat before the Caligua/Nero psychos settle in.
 
unclehobart said:
If we are following a Roman model, then I can't wait for the 'Ceasar' to cross the Rubicon and set up the dictatorial Pax Romana dictatorship. At least we should then have 2 generations of phat before the Caligua/Nero psychos settle in.
Click to expand...

Caesar=Ike
Caligula=Billy the Blowjob
Can you guess who Nero is?

Who'll be Claudius is my question.

:lol:
 
Esienhower as Ceasar? Thats stretchier than saltwater taffy. Military commander? sure. Took power at the point of a sword? hardly. The following leaders were hardly other generals or related in a hereditary way.

I can almost make a better case for Rupert Murdoch being the modern Ceasar... certainly pro football is the gladiator pit... but who would be the christians thrown to the Lions... because I always thought that the Lions themselves were the said same sacrificial lambs. Its a bit of a paradox.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top