It's not close. You can't seem to find any real effect of Wright on the way Obama governs. Even after saying Obama's stances on the issues "scream Black Liberation theology" you couldn't find any example of this "screaming".
Spikey, spikey, spikey. There's your problem. You're trying to suggest I said something that I didn't.
From the first page, post 10 & 11:
"They refuse to look at the issues look at you blindly."
"........look at the issues......"
"The one that screams marxist black liberation theology?"
One of Dictionary.com's definintions of scream is "to be conspicuous or startling: That red dress really screams."
I didn't say Obama stances on issues
reek,
drip, or
ooze of black liberation theology. I didn't say that everytime Obama opens his mouth on a subject black liberation theology rolls out. I said that Obama's association with the issue of black liberation theology itself RE: rev Wright
screams for attention in a prominent and discernible manner.
Why is that so hard for you to accept?
However, Bush has appointed at least 150 graduates from Pat Robertson's college to his administration (many of them unqualified or underqualified). A college that only has about 700 students a year.
Do you know if they ever say anything about hating whitey? Or goddamn America? Or the US of KKK A?
So are you going to answer the question yet? Why do you think it's ok for Bush to have such close ties to religious nutjobs?
Is Pat Robertson a "religious nutjob"? Can you define that term, and list some of the traits that Robertson has that leads you to think this way?
As an atheist, don't you yourself feel that most, if not all, devoutness is, infact, the indication of "a religious nutjob"?
