Gato_Solo
Out-freaking-standing OTC member
SouthernN'Proud said:Sounds like a surrender to me.
Sounds more like a sound bite in an election year to me...
I can't wait for the answer to my question, though...
SouthernN'Proud said:Sounds like a surrender to me.
How's a cop supposed to get rid of the Indian population besides dropping them off naked in fields outside of town?Gato_Solo said:I just wonder how the cop is supposed to get the perpetrator into handcuffs without twisting a body part behind them...
Leslie said:But they didn't bother, or didn't in the interests of protecting their own, and this is the result.
Leslie said:How's a cop supposed to get rid of the Indian population besides dropping them off naked in fields outside of town?
How's that Indian supposed to prove that? Provided they're not dead, of course.
And yeah, it's happened. Lots.
Gato_Solo said:I just wonder how the cop is supposed to get the perpetrator into handcuffs without twisting a body part behind them...
The article seems to say that the official position was that the statement was false. That the officer didn't twist his wrist (maybe the complaint was that it was a he twisted it too hard wah thing?). The guy says the officer did.vague article said:“It was up to the police department to determine if the speech was false,” Chaker said. “I made a complaint against a police officer for twisting my wrist and was charged as a criminal.”
Leslie said:Right...cause noone ever does wrong down there.
Heh.
Leslie said:Proof...as in conviction? Sure. Don't be ridiculous. That doesn't help the umpteen who unfortunate enough in that case to not be dead and who hence had not a hope of proving anything.
Leslie said:That was corruption, and evil people who just shouldn't have been on that job. But they wrecked it for all the good ones.
Leslie said:And I'd like to know others in the undead's positions, or those in similar situations wouldn't be arrested for trying to get some justice, even if chances were slim.
Leslie said:The article seems to say that the official position was that the statement was false. That the officer didn't twist his wrist (maybe the complaint was that it was a he twisted it too hard wah thing?). The guy says the officer did.
Or did his wrist get twisted naturally as would happen during a handcuffing, as you're alluding, and the officer is lying instead of saying well maybe it was too hard, or no it wasn't too hard, but I had to?
Leslie said:Either way, that'd be a judgement call.
Or was it not false, but simply frivolous?
Leslie said:None of that is jailworthy?
Leslie said:It's unfortunate that a few bad apples ruin the bunch, but that's it. And that's all. There has to be some way for people to speak up about the few incidents of mistreatment that come along without threat of jail of all things. And if a few good ones have to take a hit because of the baddies out there, then that's what has to be.
Leslie said:It already is in your line of work. The right guy falsely accuses you of the right thing at the right time, and you're maybe ghandi.
Someone falsely calls the police or the CAS on me, I maybe get arrested temporarily, or I've lost my kids for a little while.
There are just some things that we're helpless about.
That doesn't negate the thought that we still have to have things open enough so that people can speak up about wrongs done to them or others them without fear of persecution.
Leslie said:I read your whole post...at least the part that was there before you edited more into it. Maybe the US/Canada difference is that your police are stupid enough to leave marks. Ours don't do that.
Leslie said:It's unfortunate that a few bad apples ruin the bunch, but that's it. And that's all. There has to be some way for people to speak up about the few incidents of mistreatment that come along without threat of jail of all things. And if a few good ones have to take a hit because of the baddies out there, then that's what has to be. It happens everywhere in society, from kindergarten on, and the police shouldn't be different. Not when there's so much at stake.
Leslie said:Kinda correlates along the same lines as Oh well, we execute a few innocents, whatever. So long as we get most of them.
Once again, it also had the effect having people with true claims face jail time if the cops simply denied the claim.Gato_Solo said:Once again...this law was to prevent false claims against police. Now that law is being challenged. That means that it will no longer a crime to falsely accuse a police officer of a crime.