SouthernN'Proud
Southern Discomfort
*points out that Tonksy used fruit in an analogy about homosexuals. That is hate speech. Off with her head.
The thread seemed to me to have shifted over to "gay marriage-hypocrisy", which is what my initial post clearly speaks of. Your Peta-comparison came off as a reply to my post, perhaps that was not the case. Now, if we disregard the wedding cake and stick to the sex: If a gay man states to be against gay sex, and yet engages in gay sex regularly, then yes, that is hypocrisy.If a gay man leads a group that is against gay sex, and then engages in gay sex it is no different than a leader of an animal rights group abusing animals. Both would be hypocrisy.
I find it disturbing that you would compare being gay (simply being attracted to persons of ones own gender rather than the opposite one) to being an animal abuser (someone who takes pleasure in bringing pain and terror to a helpless living being).So if a person was an animal abuser, but still believes being and animal abuser is a sin (and is tormented by it) and voices these opinions it is not hypocrisy? Just their opinion?
Granted that this dude shouldn't be speaking out against homosexuality, but being gay and being an animal abuser are apples and oranges.
Sure, people are just attracted to who they are attracted to. It's unavoidable.
Calling it a sin is ridiculous.
This I can agree with - although keeping in mind that I don't believe in the theological consept of "sin" (acts that violate a moral code given by God). And, if using the term "wrong" to replace "sin", we'd still disagree strongly on what we considered to be "wrong".Keeping it simple...being attracted to something, anything, is not a sin. Acting on animal impulses without regard, or care, for consequences is sinful (usually illegal too)
The hypocrisy is obvious. If I was the leader of a group like PETA who professed that it was immoral to eat, wear, or be cruel in anyway to animals and then went home and tortured my dog while eating a steak would that be hypocritical?
Same thing.
The hole here is massive.
Keeping it simple...being attracted to something, anything, is not a sin. Acting on animal impulses without regard, or care, for consequences is sinful (usually illegal too)
and there's one of the rubs. Up until recently, being 'gay' was accepted as a psychosis to be cured. Therefore they wouldn't be "consenting" since they'd be considered "insane".
APAIn 1973, the weight of empirical data, coupled by changing social norms and the development of a politically active gay community in the United States, led the Board of Directors of the American Psychiatric Association to remove homosexuality from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). Their decision was ratified in 1974 by a vote of the membership.
Subsequently, a new diagnosis, ego-dystonic homosexuality, was created for the DSM's third edition in 1980. Ego dystonic homosexuality was indicated by: (1) a persistent lack of heterosexual arousal, which the patient experienced as interfering with initiation or maintenance of wanted heterosexual relationships, and (2) persistent distress from a sustained pattern of unwanted homosexual arousal.
The new diagnostic category, however, was criticized professionally on numerous grounds. It was viewed by many as a political compromise to appease those psychiatrists – mainly psychoanalysts – who still considered homosexuality a pathology. Others questioned the appropriateness of having a separate diagnosis that described the content of an individual's dysphoria. They argued that the psychological problems related to ego-dystonic homosexuality could be treated as well by other general diagnostic categories, and that the existence of the diagnosis perpetuated antigay stigma.
Moreover, widespread prejudice against homosexuality in the United States meant that "almost all people who are homosexual first go through a phase in which their homosexuality is ego dystonic," according to the American Psychiatric Association.
In 1986, the diagnosis was removed entirely from the DSM. The only vestige of ego dystonic homosexuality in the revised DSM-III occurred under Sexual Disorders Not Otherwise Specified, which included persistent and marked distress about one's sexual orientation (American Psychiatric Association, 1987; see Bayer, 1987, for an account of the events leading up to the 1973 and 1986 decisions).
the weight of empirical data, coupled by changing social norms and the development of a politically active gay community in the United States,
While I concur, The devil's advocate is that pedophiles will use the same excuse.
But what it comes down to is sin is sin and we all sin. If you are right with God then your sin is forgiven.
Hmm...well I sort of agree with you. I say sort of because I have been taught that it is a sin. I have also been taught that lying, cheating, stealing, laziness, gossiping, fornication, gluttony, covetting, disobeying the sabbath and evil thoughts are sins. I have also been taught that all sins are equal in the eyes of the Lord
and if I am to point out anothers sin I had better be sure that my nose is clean...which it isn't and no ones is.
So I guess I mean that we all have our strengths and weaknesses and I won't mind yours if you don't mind mine.