Geckos don't like Glenn Beck

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Afraid". It and many of its alternatives is a word bandied about by the left. Especially when talking about the right.

These same people were asking "what did he know & when did he know it".

These same people who frequently say "something should have been done" or "wasn't it obvious".

Which do you prefer? Observers who report what they see or the blind?
 
Gonz said:
These same people who frequently say "something should have been done" or "wasn't it obvious".
Click to expand...

Sounds like they were reporting something they observed that was a problem.

Which do you prefer? Observers who report what they see or the blind?
Click to expand...

I much prefer observers who report the specific things they see than blind fear of vague crap like "Oh no, be afraid of vague unintended consequences!".

You end up like these morons.

hgqmf


or maybe you deface a monument

3912683879_ebbd7224f3.jpg
 
spike said:
or maybe you deface a monument
Click to expand...

Deface? Look it up. I'll bet not one spray paint, pencil, marker, or other permanent marring instrument was found anywhere on it.

The sign is correct. Our troops do not fight & die for socialism.
 
Gonz said:
So, mercury is all our lightbulbs is good for the envirommeent? Acid filled batteries with a, roughly, 4 year life cycle are good for the environment? Gasoline, with human crops as addatives, is good for us?

Probity....when you decide to come to the party without you DU & huffing&puffingtonpost add-ons, we might be able to carry on a conversation.
Click to expand...

One more, but I'm sure this will be suspect too.

http://www.courant.com/news/politics/sns-200909101253tmsbpresstt--m-a20090910sep10,0,6002605.story

Oh come now Gonz. You make it sound as if you are the only one who cares about the environment and products grown for human consumption.

Haven't you ever noticed when the government (please note absence of any specific political party being mentioned) begins to consider taking action, special interest groups manage to fill the air with, "to much government interference," and/or lobbyists are hired to combat the proposed regulation by whatever industry will be affected the most. So tell me, Gonz, where were you going with that?

And, on the subject of sources, what part of the information provided in the two sources, deemed unreliable? The nextright.com and Huffington Post stories were accurate. And did anyone note the part where WND will not be permitted to speak at the CPAC rally next year. But, considering the bunker mentality mentioned in the nextright article, it is easy to see where it might make some who use WMD as a reliable source a bit testy.
 
when the government begins to consider taking action
Click to expand...

They ought first read Section 8. If it's not in there, it's not the job of the government.

Government is not our mommy.

The nextright.com and Huffington Post stories were accurate
Click to expand...

When the source is a blog, it's not news. I'd never dream of anyone using OTC as a source, even when we include links. Use the original.

There had better be no less than two sources to confirm the story (old school journalism)
 
Frank Probity said:
And did anyone note the part where WND will not be permitted to speak at the CPAC rally next year.
Click to expand...

Actually, the useful idiot's blog only said that the founder wouldn't be permitted to speak there RE: certifigate.

And isn't it strange how everyone happily ignored the occasional sensationalism of WND’s headlines until they appeared as the center of the eligibility question? :shrug:

Then there's this:

"Google and Yahoo Censoring Obama Eligibility Reports"



GOP bloggers call for boycott of WND!

Surprise. It's not just the Obama administration and the left that's using intimidation tactics to malign and suppress WorldNetDaily. Now a few Republican bloggers are using the same bullying tactics in an effort to put WND out of business by calling on Americans to, and I quote, "boycott any of those organizations that will not renounce … support for WorldNetDaily."

I'm not kidding.

It started with someone named Jon Henke who writes a blog called "The Next Right." The title of his piece says it all: "Organizing Against WorldNetDaily."

What's his beef?
Click to expand...


Did you catch Rush's speech this year, by the way?


Maybe Glenn Beck will be the keynote speaker next year. :brow:




WorldNetDaily scoops:

Read all about it!
 
Gonz said:
Deface? Look it up. I'll bet not one spray paint, pencil, marker, or other permanent marring instrument was found anywhere on it.
Click to expand...

You're all for climbing all over monuments now? Great. No respect.

The sign is correct. Our trops did not die to fight for socialism.
Click to expand...

Obama is the anti-christ is correct? Wow, you've lost it.

"The foundation of our Empire was not laid in the gloomy age of Ignorance and Superstition, but at an Epoch when the rights of mankind were better understood and more clearly defined, than at any former period" - George Washington
 
Gonz said:
When the source is a blog, it's not news. I'd never dream of anyone using OTC as a source, even when we include links. Use the original.

There had better be no less than two sources to confirm the story (old school journalism)
Click to expand...

Interesting that you don't hold yourself or Cerise to this standard...ever. She just posted another link to WND. :laugh:
 
You had said something about the sign being correct.

WND is less reliable than most blogs. It's an extremist sensationalist site full of biased opinion. If that is fair game than any site is.
 
You picked a sign out of the background to refer to as "the sign" instead of the one that was the focal point? Weird.

Both stupid signs tho'.
 
Cerise said:
Did you catch Rush's speech this year, by the way?
Maybe Glenn Beck will be the keynote speaker next year. :brow:
WorldNetDaily scoops:
Read all about it!
Click to expand...

And you think that speech by Limbaugh was something to brag on? Not on;y did the man make a fool of himself but he ranted incoherently for nearly an hour. My how easily misled you are cerise. Toss in Glenn Beck and you get two fear mongers and liars for the price of one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top