Nixy said:Then what was the point of his cutting it out and reattaching it? He shoulda used his graphic whatzzit skills to make it bigger and clearer....
Professur said:He did. Really good, isn't he?
MrBishop said:Lemme see.... a pic reduced to 72ppi. Take a miniature portion of it, less than 50X50px. I can resize it to my heart's content but it won't look any nicer.
Sharpening, desaturation, if I had more than 10 minutes, I could use a healing brush and try and fix something....but the pixels make it look like hell.
The whole point was...if you're going to reply to a dare with a miniature pic that doesn't show any details...why bother?
Professur said:You know what pisses me off about CSI? Not once, do they pay hommage to the man that started them off; Quincy.
And, how come every crime gets solved .... by the evidence. No knocking on doors, talking to sniches, no police work. Every crime ..... jsut by trace evidence.
Professur said:What in hell is the crime lab doing talking to anyone, anyways. That's not their job. That's the real cops' job.
unclehobart said:I blew it further. OMFG! Its like looking into a time warp!
That show annoys me no end, for the reasons you mentioned, plus others like the silly "fake" technology shit with whirry noises. Eesh. If my computer made noises like that all the time, I'd fuckin' shoot the damned thing. Yeah, I hate that show. [/grinch]Professur said:What in hell is the crime lab doing talking to anyone, anyways. That's not their job. That's the real cops' job.
Oh my god. You were in The Breakfast Club?paul_valaru said:ok
15
then 27-29ish
then 30ish
PT said:Oh my god. You were in The Breakfast Club?
Sure Claire, whatever you say.paul_valaru said:I better be the judd neilson character!!!!!!
SouthernN'Proud said:Has no pics. Period.
Dammit.