N.Y. GOP candidate exposed as racist

[MrBishop]

Louis Farrakhan wants segregated schools. He is also a separatist and has demanded that some states be turned over to an all Black citizenry.

Oh, but wait, he's a lefty and he's Black and he's a Muslim. He's alright because of those characteristics. Never mind.

Farrankhan is a fucknut with a crowd.

 

[MrBishop]

Segregation should not be forced and neither should integration. America should be a tossed salad, not a melting pot.

America should be more like Canada, then. We call it a Mosaic tho'
"Tossed salad" is a whole other story.

 

[spike]

"Tossed salad" is a whole other story.

 

[ResearchMonkey]

Yeah, those two didn't change party most of the racist southern democrats did though.

Nonetheless, the KKK was born of the democratic party where is was nurtured and loved, correct?

And the dems kept them in office, in Byrd's case, forever.

That's why you find white supremacists now almost exclusively in the Republican or Tea Parties.That why the dems kept the Klan in the legislator

LMAO you lie. Obama has done nothing for race relation, in fact he has only created more division (but he does love the religion of Islam)

Do you know anything about the beliefs of Science Czar John Holden?

Progressives have not 'miscegenation' since 1924.

Obama Care? ....just trust us, we have your best interest at heart.

 

[ResearchMonkey]

America should be more like Canada,

I've always admired the Canadian culture, with its Canadian food and Canadian music.

 

[ResearchMonkey]

Hey look, Obama's Justice Department is racist.

A Justice Department prosecutor defied his superiors by testifying at a U.S. Civil Rights Commission hearing Friday, where he leveled an explosive allegation: top officials in the department gutted a voter intimidation case against a fringe African American militant group because the suspects were black and their alleged victims were white.

The prosecutor, Christopher Coates, also said the downgrading of the case against the New Black Panther Party was evidence of a Justice Department culture which discouraged “race neutral” enforcement of civil rights laws, frowned on prosecuting minority perpetrators and folded under pressure from black and Latino rights groups. After President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder took office, the culture intensified, Coates told the panel, ultimately leading to his departure as chief of the voting rights section early this year.

“They have not pursued the goal of equal protection of the law for all people,” he said.
​

Read more about the Racist Obama Administration.​

Gee, and you keep saying the TeaParty is racist but you cannot seem prove it in the slightest.

You lie.

 

[spike]

Nonetheless, the KKK was born of the democratic party where is was nurtured and loved, correct?

Yeah, ex-confederate army Southern Democrats. Who mostly became Republicans as we already covered.

"The passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which was widely opposed by white Southerners, was the event that finally moved the majority of Southerners to the Republican Party on a national level."

LMAO you lie.

Nope, white supremacists are almost exclusively in the Republican or Tea Parties. Go over to Stormfront and see for yourself. They even have a Tea Party sub forum.

 

[ResearchMonkey]

I'm sure you really believe that. Congress is more than just SoDems, deal with it buddy.

Democrats were the problem in '64, republican support passed it. emancipation proclamation came from a republican. The truth is history tells the democrats were, and still are, racist. That's why race is always an issue with them. Republicans believe we are all created equal and you have to freedom to achieve anything.

We constitutional conservatives believe any NBC can become President of the United States without affirmative actions. While you democrats believe those niggers couldn't do shit left to their own devices, so you legislate government dependent slavery. Even when they are "...light-skinned," and with "no negro dialect." -- Harry Reid's acceptable type of negro.

Hypocrites of the worst kind.

 

[Gotholic]

Discrimination based on race is racism. Says so right in your own definition.

No, discrimination is not in and of itself racism unless you are discriminating a race due to "a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others."

Sure they can. My own heritage vs the various countries my ancestors came from comes from growing up in America as opposed to those countries.

Again I ask, "out of those races in which you are comprised of, how many of those languages that each of those races speak do you know? How many authentic dishes can you cook that is part of the races in which you are? How much history and tradition of each race do you know?"

Yes, it's very common for people to expand their culture.

People's children get the benefits of both cultures.

That my happen for the first generation. It gets water down heavily the second and third generations.

Sure, often people can be more attracted to people outside their race or find them more interesting.

Racist!

 

[ResearchMonkey]

Discrimination based on race is racism. Says so right in your own definition.

• So affirmative action is racist.
• The DoJ non-prosecution of the Black panther voting intimidation incident is racist.
• $2 billion to black farmers is racist.
• any thought of slavery reparations is racist.
• Race based scholarships are racist.
• Any law that favors a minority over crackers is racist.

democrats believe in supporting racism, thanks for clearing that up spike

 

[spike]

Congress is more than just SoDems

Who said it wasn't?

The truth is history tells the democrats were, and still are, racist. That's why race is always an issue with them. Republicans believe we are all created equal and you have to freedom to achieve anything.

Nope.

White Supremacist Stormfronters -> Almost exclusively Republican or Tea Party
Bigots against gay rights -> Right wing thing mostly
Bigots who hate all Muslims -> Right wing thing mostly
Anyone on this board who has made an argument that women shouldn't have been given the right to vote -> Republicans
Winky -> Republican

While you democrats believe those niggers couldn't do shit left to their own devices, so you legislate government dependent slavery.

Nope, there's no government mandated slavery for black people.

While you have shown blatant bigotry against women, gays, muslims, etc.

You've even insinuated in this thread that people of other races don't work hard or live in nice neighborhoods.

You can't win this one with your history.

 

[Winky]

Finally a good idea

Continually Posted by Spikey
-My recommendation, assassinate the jigga-boo and be done with it.

 

[Cerise]

Jive ass dude don't got no brains anyhow! Hmmph!

 

[ResearchMonkey]

I geez, you're talking about the National Socialist white pride movement, all 200 hundred of them? Get a grip son, they may like the TeaParty and the energy it has, but they donot represent any significant percentage let alone the ideology of the TeaParty.

Discontent for homosexuals isn't bigotry, it personal beliefs in morality and healthy choices. You just have very poor sense of morality and a love for the abomination. You think cigarettes are bad, homosexuality is worse and you want to promote it.


Here's the play book for the homosexual agenda, it is the bible for the Agenda. It's like your Alinski manual, you probably have both on books already on your desk.

After the Ball

​

​

Page xv - All homosexually suicides are based entirely on societal rejection.

Page xxiii - It is acceptable to call people "Homophobic" or "Homohaters" if they do not agree 100% with homosexual views, opinions, or behavior.

Page 49 - Claim “vast majority” of homosexuals do not engage in compulsive high-risk sex.​

Page 64 - 67:All sexual morality should be abolished. (NAMBLA, pedophilia, bestiality etc.)

Page 170 - A media campaign should portray only the most favorable side of gays

Page 183 - “Mustachioed leather men, drag queens, and bull dykes” should not appear in gay commercials and other public presentations (until later after wide acceptance)

Page 184 - Groups on the farthest margins of acceptability, such as NAMBLA, must play no part at all in the media campaign.

Page 184 - "We argue that for all practical purposes, gays should be considered to have been born gay, even though sexual orientation, for most humans, seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors during childhood and early adolescence"

Page 186 - In time we see no reason why more and more diversity should not be introduced into the projected image (i.e.; drag queens, pedophiles, etc.)

Page 190 - The Nazi story of "pink triangle as a symbol of victimization" should be a sufficient opening wedge into the vilification of our enemies

Page 221 - Make victimizers look bad by linking to Nazi horror while helping straights to see gays as victims and feel protective towards them.

Page 235 - Jam the self-righteous pride by linking to a disreputable hate group . (Stormfront?)

Page 271 - The more people who appear to practice homosexuality, and the more innate it appears to be, the less abnormal and objectionable, and the more legitimate it will seem. (10% of the population? not)

**much more of the alinski for homosexuals can be found here ..

​

The homosexual agenda is disingenuous at best. Its a filthy lifestyle based on an addiction of self gratification and/or self degradation and a misuse of plumbing. If there is any natural occurrence among men, its a safety switch of some type.

AIDs is, and always has been, a homosexual disease despite the campaign to tell us otherwise. AID's spreads by casual promiscuity and needles/blood. Both are generally considered poor behavioral choices by normal people. Black women are the biggest real victims of men who keep it on the "down-low". (civilized world speaking)

CHICAGO, Sept 23 (Reuters) - Nearly one in five gay and bisexual men in 21 major U.S. cities are infected with HIV, and nearly half of them do not know it, U.S. health officials said on Thursday.

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Reuters Rural America ROCKS!

Anyway.

1% of UK citizens openly homosexual: study


LONDON -- More than 480,000 people or one percent of the UKs adult population regard themselves as gay or lesbian while a further 245,000 or 0.5 percent say they are bisexual, according a study published by the Office for National Statistics.

China Post

Much smaller than the 10% we always hear about per the GayAlinski tasticle manual. And this is the UK where being gay is not only acceptable but is a badge of honor. It would be fair to assume that, liberally speaking; the US can't be more than 2% homosexual, double that of the UK.

So

MARRIAGE DIGEST: New study: Homosexual men prone to promiscuity

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (BP)--A new study by a group of University of Chicago researchers reveals a high level of promiscuity and unhealthy behavior among that city's homosexual male population.

According to the researchers, 42.9 percent of homosexual men in Chicago's Shoreland area have had more than 60 sexual partners, while an additional 18.4 percent have had between 31 and 60 partners. All total, 61.3 percent of the area's homosexual men have had more than 30 partners, and 87.8 percent have had more than 15, the research found.

As a result, 55.1 percent of homosexual males in Shoreland -- known as Chicago's "gay center" -- have at least one sexually transmitted disease, researchers said.

Baptist folks

So lets look at the result of this information.

July 2010

CDC estimates that more than one million people are living with HIV in the United States. One in five (21%) of those people living with HIV is unaware of their infection.

Despite increases in the total number of people living with HIV in the US in recent years, the annual number of new HIV infections has remained relatively stable. However, new infections continue at far too high a level, with an estimated 56,300 Americans becoming infected with HIV each year.
More than 18,000 people with AIDS still die each year in the US. Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM)† are strongly affected and represent the majority of persons who have died. Through 2007, more than 576,000 people with AIDS in the US have died since the epidemic began.


HIV Incidence and Prevalence, US, 1977-2006

By Risk Group

• Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM): By risk group, gay, bisexual, and other MSM of all races remain the population most severely affected by HIV.
• • MSM account for more than half (53%) of all new HIV infections in the U.S. each year, as well as nearly half (48%) of people living with HIV.
  • While CDC estimates that MSM account for just 4% of the US male population aged 13 and older, the rate of new HIV diagnoses among MSM in the US is more than 44 times that of other men and more than 40 times that of women.
  • White MSM account for the largest number of annual new HIV infections of any group in the US, followed closely by black MSM.
  • MSM is the only risk group in the U.S. in which new HIV infections have been increasing since the early 1990s.

Source: Centers for Disease Control

Behavior, homosexuality is a behavior and an extremely destructive one. Smoking is behavior too yet it is demonized for what it is and homosexuality is promoted as a positive choice by people like yourself.. (ie: liberal thinking kills)



So we have ~1million people with AID's in the United States -- How many $$$ billions does our government spend on this behaviorally spread disease? -- Research and free medicine, plenty!

How many diabetics do we have? ~28 million diabetics in the US, ~8% of the population and yet its receives just a fraction of the funding.

(I don't mind university research, but both should be a private sector projects otherwise -- ObamaCare will kill most of the private sector research, thanks O)

​

With the above facts, there are a few things any reasonable person can deduce, you are certain to miss them.

• Homosexuality is an extremely dangerous behavior.
• Homosexuals want societal validation and acceptance of their abhorrent behaviors.
• Time tested social morality is again proven to be truth over the impulsive and addictive behaviors.

So many billion spent on an agenda of lies and deception by the screaming queens of Sodom. Demanding we accept and pay for their abnormal behavioral choices.

It's simple really, don't have homosexual sex and don't do drugs. (and women, don't have sex with men who are homosexuals)

Despite your lack of morality and inability to control yourself: AIDs and the STD epidemic in the US has a very simple solution. Morality: Abstinence works, every time.

**********************************

Keep up the good work, and fight the good fight. Your helping to expose the truth about the left to the rest of America everyday.

Have great day spike.






​

 

[spike]

I geez, you're talking about the National Socialist white pride movement, all 200 hundred of them?

No, talking about white supremacists. There's over 200,000 members of Stormfront let alone all the others.

Get a grip son, they may like the TeaParty and the energy it has, but they donot represent any significant percentage let alone the ideology of the TeaParty.

There's certainly a large number of white supremacists in the Tea Party. I'm going to go ahead and use your Muslim logic and say they're all white supremacists.

Discontent for homosexuals isn't bigotry, it personal beliefs in morality and healthy choices.

Shit, since when have you given a shit about morals?

You think cigarettes are bad, homosexuality is worse and you want to promote it.

I want to promote freedom. It's an American thing. Consenting adults in a relationship that doesn't hurt anyone else is moral.

Killing hundreds of thousands of civililians is immoral but your fine with that. As far as healhy choice goes are you now for making cigarrettes and McDonalds illegal or something?

Here's the play book for the homosexual agenda, it is the bible for the Agenda. It's like your Alinski manual, you probably have both on books already on your desk.

Never heard of either of them so you seem to have made up this bible thing. Not really interested in TCFamily's interpretations either.

The homosexual agenda is disingenuous at best. Its a filthy lifestyle based on an addiction of self gratification and/or self degradation and a misuse of plumbing.

Yeah, there are some straight and gay people that like sex for self gratification and do kinky shit. Not really interested in limiting their freedom.

AIDs is, and always has been, a homosexual disease despite the campaign to tell us otherwise. AID's spreads by casual promiscuity and needles/blood. Both are generally considered poor behavioral choices by normal people.

AIDS affects stright and gay people and can be minimized by responsible use of protection. Anyone that doesn't use proper protection is making poor choices.

Much smaller than the 10% we always hear about per the GayAlinski tasticle manual. And this is the UK where being gay is not only acceptable but is a badge of honor.

Actually there's lots of bigots in the UK just like here so many people are probably unwilling to out themselves. Not sure why the percentage matters though.

Behavior, homosexuality is a behavior and an extremely destructive one.

No, homosexuality is not necesarily destructive just like being straight is not necessarily detructive.

Smoking is behavior too yet it is demonized for what it is and homosexuality is promoted as a positive choice by people like yourself.

Smoking is always unhealthy.Most people can have healthy relationships straight or gay.

I smoke, I realize it's unhealthy. It's my choice though.

How many diabetics do we have? ~28 million diabetics in the US, ~8% of the population and yet its receives just a fraction of the funding.

I would be interested in seeing the funding for AIDS, Cancer, diabetes, heart disease etc.

Homosexuality is an extremely dangerous behavior.

Nope. Motorcycle racing is dangerous though. Do you want to ban it?

Homosexuals want societal validation and acceptance of their abhorrent behaviors.

In America we call it freedom.

Time tested social morality is again proven to be truth over the impulsive and addictive behaviors.So many billion spent on an agenda of lies and deception by the screaming queens of Sodom. Demanding we accept and pay for their abnormal behavioral choices.

There's the psycho coming out.

It's simple really, don't have homosexual sex and don't do drugs. (and women, don't have sex with men who are homosexuals)

The voice against freedom.

Despite your lack of morality and inability to control yourself

I have a much higher level of morality and self control than you will ever be able to concieve of attaining.

AIDs and the STD epidemic in the US has a very simple solution. Morality: Abstinence works, every time.

Nobody have sex! Good luck with that.

 

[jimpeel]

(RM): Homosexuals want societal validation and acceptance of their abhorrent behaviors.

In America we call it freedom.

Then why do we regulate other forms of self destructive behavior?

 

[spike]

Being gay or lesbian isn't self destructive. But yeah sure, why regulate alcohol and not McDonalds?

 

[ResearchMonkey]

No, talking about white supremacists. There's over 200,000 members of Stormfront let alone all the others.

There's certainly a large number of white supremacists in the Tea Party. I'm going to go ahead and use your Muslim logic and say they're all white supremacists.

LOL, right Is this your own personal research f4rom all the time you spend at Stormfront?

Well NAMBLA is an lefty community, right there with Kevin Jennings. So all progressive are child molesters. - Thanks for clearing that up.

I want to promote freedom. It's an American thing. Consenting adults in a relationship that doesn't hurt anyone else is moral.

It kills people, I guess you don't see that as immoral though. The tragedy is unsuspecting women and children who get the HIV virus from consenting adult men who get infected on the down-low. -- How moral is that?

Buttsechs must be great, to die for, to kill for.

Never heard of either of them so you seem to have made up this bible thing.

LOL, you've never heard of Alinski. riiight. Regardless, its the book that has lead the homosexual agenda, its the blueprint of the agenda you swallow hook-line-sinker.

You're a lying tool.

Yeah, there are some straight and gay people that like sex for self gratification and do kinky shit. Not really interested in limiting their freedom.

I'm not interested in paying for the deviant behaviors. I'm also agasht at the living women and children I know who have contracted HIV from husbands who were getting some ass on the "down-low". Not to mention the other wimmin' and childers I've known who have since died.

the anus is not designed for two way traffic, it rips and tears with reciprocal penetration. The preferred method for AIDs transmission during "sexual acts".

Don't participate anal sex and don't share drugs needles. As a male, you have virtually eliminated the chance to host the virus that causes AID's.

AIDS affects stright and gay people and can be minimized by responsible use of protection. Anyone that doesn't use proper protection is making poor choices.

AID's may affect everyone the same physically, but the spread of it is somewhat different. My chances of catching HIV from a woman while having vaginal sex is insignificant compared to the odds of catching from getting the poison seed rammed up my ass by a man.

I guess the CDC facts alluded your higher intellect..

By Risk Group

• Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM): By risk group, gay, bisexual, and other MSM of all races remain the population most severely affected by HIV.
• • MSM account for more than half (53%) of all new HIV infections in the U.S. each year, as well as nearly half (48%) of people living with HIV.
  • While CDC estimates that MSM account for just 4% of the US male population aged 13 and older, the rate of new HIV diagnoses among MSM in the US is more than 44 times that of other men and more than 40 times that of women.
  • White MSM account for the largest number of annual new HIV infections of any group in the US, followed closely by black MSM.
  • MSM is the ONLY risk group in the U.S. in which new HIV infections have been increasing since the early 1990s.

Source: Centers for Disease Control

No, homosexuality is not necesarily destructive just like being straight is not necessarily detructive.

I guess you don't know about the human species. Show me one successful homosexual civilization.

Smoking is always unhealthy.Most people can have healthy relationships straight or gay.

I smoke, I realize it's unhealthy. It's my choice though.

i encourage you to smoke more with every breath.

Again you don't know very much about behavioral sciences do you.

I would be interested in seeing the funding for AIDS, Cancer, diabetes, heart disease etc.

Due to the screaming queens, they diverted much of the funding for the later to AIDs. Gov't sponsored AID's research dwarfs diabetes.

In America we call it freedom.

In America we call it the spreading a dangerous pathogen. You seem to believe we should allow tuberculosis to run wild for freedom.

There's the psycho coming out.

Psycho is allowing for a dangerous pathogen to spread while we create laws that protect the individuals in ways that assist to hide the individuals condition.

Typhoid Mary comes to mind.

The voice against freedom.

You're a fucking idiot.

I have a much higher level of morality and self control than you will ever be able to concieve of attaining.

You base your ideology's on emotional lies and not a hint of common sense.

You believe in low morality and paint it with skittles from unicorns.

You must have been high when the gay community abandoned the facade that AID's was retrosexual disease. It was ploy to normalize the the AID's issue to get more funding and acceptance.

Someone finally figured out that telling the truth might just help to save some lives and solve the problem.

California Homosexual Organization Admits HIV/AIDS is "Gay Disease"


LOS ANGELES, California, October 4, 2006 – The Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center has abandoned a long-held homosexual activist contention by declaring on billboards posted throughout Southern California that HIV/AIDS is a “gay disease.”

2006

it's still not politically correct to speak this truth. The militant homosexuals still try to promote the idea that its not a gay issue.




Try to discuss sexual addiction among the homosexual community and you swiftly be called on about morality and discover the agenda to eliminate the morality discussion. Sexual addiction is the problem and it is destructive. Just check the facts about AID's among other issues.



Some advice: you shouldn't use the word "freedom" in your post. You don't have a grasp of what it is and it makes you look really stupid when you use it as you do.


Don't get me wrong, I don't expect you will ever be capable of understanding simple truths about the complex issues of human behaviors. You're simply too ignorant.

 

[jimpeel]

Yeah, there are some straight and gay people that like sex for self gratification and do kinky shit. Not really interested in limiting their freedom.

Ever heard of barebacking parties? Look it up. Maybe you would like to join if it is so innocuous.

 

[spike]

LOL, right Is this your own personal research f4rom all the time you spend at Stormfront?

Well NAMBLA is an lefty community, right there with Kevin Jennings. So all progressive are child molesters. - Thanks for clearing that up.

I don't know that NAMBLA is lefty. Looks like a mix. The Catholic child molesters are mostly right wing so all conservatives are child molesters.

It kills people, I guess you don't see that as immoral though.

Nope, consenting adults in a relationship doesn't kill people. Some straight people and some gay people engage in dangerous activities.

The tragedy is unsuspecting women and children who get the HIV virus from consenting adult men who get infected on the down-low. -- How moral is that?

Yeah, that's a tragedy whether their straight or gay. Luckily it's rare either way.

Buttsechs must be great, to die for, to kill for.

People have killed for all kinds of sex throughout history.

LOL, you've never heard of Alinski. riiight. Regardless, its the book that has lead the homosexual agenda, its the blueprint of the agenda you swallow hook-line-sinker.

You're a lying tool.

Looks like you made that up...and then accused me of lying. Pathetic.

I'm not interested in paying for the deviant behaviors.

I suggest you stop paying for deviant sex then.

I'm also agasht at the living women and children I know who have contracted HIV from husbands who were getting some ass on the "down-low". Not to mention the other wimmin' and childers I've known who have since died.

Yeah, when any straight or gay person cheats and passes on a disease it's awful. Most people don't cheat though and you'd think if they did most of them would be smart enough to use protection.

the anus is not designed for two way traffic, it rips and tears with reciprocal penetration.

Yeah, gay and straight people do all sorts of things. Anal sex, blowjobs, handjobs, titty fucking, etc. I understand you probably stick to the basics.

Don't participate anal sex and don't share drugs needles. As a male, you have virtually eliminated the chance to host the virus that causes AID's.

"Transmission/How it is Spread:

Spread through contact with infected blood, semen, or vaginal fluids.

Contracted through oral, anal, or vaginal sex, sharing needles among drug users, or contact with infected blood.

Can be passed from mother to child during pregnancy, vaginal delivery, or through breast milk.

Having other STDS (like herpes and chlamydia) increase the risk of getting and spreading HIV.

Complications:

Infections that a healthy body could fight off often become life-threatening in somebody with AIDS because of the weakened immune system.

Prevention:

Abstain from sexual activity.

Faithful marriage or mutually monogamous relationship with an uninfected partner.

Latex condoms, when used the right way all the time, reduce but do not eliminate the risk.

Avoid contact with blood. Do not touch other's blood without latex gloves. Do not share needles.

There is no vaccine to prevent HIV infection."

AID's may affect everyone the same physically, but the spread of it is somewhat different. My chances of catching HIV from a woman while having vaginal sex is insignificant compared to the odds of catching from getting the poison seed rammed up my ass by a man.

Yes, straight people are more prone to certain diseases and homsexuals are more prone to some. Homosexuals vary whether they're male or female.

I guess you don't know about the human species. Show me one successful homosexual civilization.

We don't have homosexual or heterosexual civilizations. It's always been a mix.

i encourage you to smoke more with every breath.

Again you don't know very much about behavioral sciences do you.

Apparently a hell of a lot more than you.

Due to the screaming queens, they diverted much of the funding for the later to AIDs. Gov't sponsored AID's research dwarfs diabetes.

I would be interested in seeing the funding for AIDS, Cancer, diabetes, heart disease etc.

In America we call it the spreading a dangerous pathogen. You seem to believe we should allow tuberculosis to run wild for freedom.

That's sounding pretty psycho. Americans are for freedom. As well as taking precautions to prevent sexually transmitted diseases amongst gay or straight people.

Psycho is allowing for a dangerous pathogen to spread

Yes, everyone should use protection.

You're a fucking idiot.

The trolling when you have nothing to say is funny.

You base your ideology's on emotional lies and not a hint of common sense.

No, that's what you do. I catch you in your fantasies daily making shit up.

You believe in low morality and paint it with skittles from unicorns.

You are far more for low morality.

it's still not politically correct to speak this truth.

It's fine. try it sometime.

Try to discuss sexual addiction among the homosexual community and you swiftly be called on about morality and discover the agenda to eliminate the morality discussion.

No, it's fine to discuss gay or straight sexual addiction. Unless you're prudes.

Some advice: you shouldn't use the word "freedom" in your post.

I know the idea offends you but I'm going to keep promoting freedom while you promote limiting people's freedom and the nanny state.

Don't get me wrong, I don't expect you will ever be capable of understanding simple truths about the complex issues of human behaviors. You're simply too ignorant.

You've demonstrated a severe lack of knowledge of behavior and facts in favor of your made up reality and hate. I don't expect this to change.