New Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery

G

Gotholic

Well-Known Member
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
April 28, 2011

Our investigation of the purported Obama birth certificate released by Hawaiian authorities today reveals the document is a shoddily contrived hoax. Infowars.com computer specialists dismissed the document as a fraud soon after examining it.

Check out the document released by WhiteHouse.gov for yourself.

attachment.php


Upon first inspection, the document appears to be a photocopy taken from state records and printed on official green paper. However, when the government released PDF is taken into the image editing program Adobe Illustrator, we discover a number of separate elements that reveal the document is not a single scan on paper, as one might surmise. Elements are placed in layers or editing boxes over the scan and green textured paper, which is to say the least unusual.

When sections of the document are enlarged significantly, we discover glaring inconsistencies. For instance, it appears the date stamped on the document has been altered. Moreover, the document contains text, numbers, and lines with suspicious white borders indicating these items were pasted from the original scan and dropped over a background image of green paper.

VIDEO: Alex Jones gives proof that Obama’s purported birth certificate is fraud.


Let’s assume the state of Hawaii scanned the original document and placed it on the green textured background. This does not explain the broken out or separate elements. There is no logical reason for this to be done unless the government planned to modify the document and make it appear to be something other than it is.

There are two elements of interest, as shown in the image to the above – both entries for the date accepted by the local registry. This appears to have been modified in an image editing program.

The media was quick to dispel the fact the document was modified. “Our analysis of the latest controversy: The original birth certificate was probably in a ‘negative’ form, and someone at the White House took it upon themselves to doctor it up so the form can be readable,” writes Joe Brooks for Wireupdate.

Nathan Goulding, writing for the National Review, tells us anybody can open the White House released PDF in Illustrator and it will break out into layers. “I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home,” he writes.

Indeed, but this does not answer the question why in the Obama birth certificate PDF the layers or elements contain dates – which appear to be modified – and the signature of the state registrar. If the document was acquired from state records in whole, why was it necessary to add elements? Goulding and Brooks do not address this issue.

These layers are also revealed by the White House issued PDF’s hex file in freeware
Hex_editor
. Within its code are listed 8 image masks, which if changed from value “true” to “false” turn off and on to reveal the layers as demonstrated in the video and in Illustrator. Whether these represent compression artifacts or other digitizing processes, or whether these masks represent deliberate manipulation remains to be conclusively shown.

<< /Length 17 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 123 /Height 228 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >> << /Length 13 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 199 /Height 778 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>
<< /Length 19 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 47 /Height 216 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>

<< /Length 15 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 42 /Height 274 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>

<< /Length 10 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 1454 /Height 1819
/ImageMask true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>

<< /Length 25 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 132 /Height 142 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>

<< /Length 23 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 243 /Height 217 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>

<< /Length 21 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 34 /Height 70 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>​

As Market-Ticker.org points out, it may prove to be significant that two of the boxes appear over both of the “date accepted” boxes, as well as the “Mother’s occupation box.” Was there a need to tamper with the dates on the document or other areas? The recent stamp date and issuing signature of the state registrar also contain an edited layer.

Questions have also been raised about the number at the top of the document issued by the Department of Health, number 61 10641, as one part of the number is in a separate layer when viewed in Illustrator, as demonstrated in the video above. This may prove to be significant. A long form birth certificate obtained by the Honolulu Star in 2009 from a female born one day after Obama and whose form was accepted three days after Obama’s document contains a Dept. of Health number that is lower, 61 10637. There are other subtle differences, such as the use of “Aug.” for the date rather than “August,” and the use of “Honolulu, Oahu” rather than “Honolulu, Hawaii” (seen also in the 1962 certificate below) which may or may not be significant.

More to the point, this certificate and others, like the one posted below it, have visible seals. No issuing seal can be seen on the document released today by Obama.

Negative of long form birth certificate for Aug. 5, 1961 birth in Honolulu, released in 1966 with seal and dated signatures.Published by Honolulu Star and World Net Daily in 2009.

Photo of physical copy of long form birth certificate for June 15, 1962 birth in Honolulu, also with visible seal.
attachment.php


Infowars will continue to analyze this issue as more information comes in. It is significant that the Obama Administration was pressured into responding to this controversy, whatever the final analysis of this document. However, the administration still needs to release his other records which have been sealed at great expense. Is there an issue with his being naturalized in Indonesia? Why are his college records at Columbia and Occidental sealed, and what do they contain? Did Obama travel to Pakistan on a foreign passport? These questions and many others have not been properly answered.

Aaron Dykes contributed to this report.
Click to expand...

Source
 
0bozo has spent nearly $2 mil in lawyer's fees over the past 2 years defending himself from showing it . No way was he going to pull out his real BC.
 
I think they did all that on purpose.

whether he does, or whether he doesn't have the paper, I'm done with the mess.
I'm going to concentrate on the bigger issues that are directly affecting the 'Most' Americans.
Like gas, and food prices ...(inflation)...(that is the issue that will take Obama Out)
 
A document scanned by any machine that attempts to do some OCR will automatically create 'text boxes' around where it thinks text is..and that information, when the scan is saved into a pdf, will remain. Illustrator sees these and will give you the nice blue outlines you see. These items are not ungroupeable, nor modifiable. I've seen teh same thing happen when I scanned a photo of my mother at age 5-6. The OCR will put boxes around the weirdest shit.


A negative means a photo, which means shadows off the embossing. A scan on the other hand may not show embossing at all.

*peepwall*
 
All this means nothing to the conspiracists, of course. EVERYTHING is a hoax!

Why just the other day, Elvis flew back to Arizona and personally told me that his alien friends went to the moon and have found no evidence that man's ever been there....and called us all foolish round-earthers.
 
MrBishop said:
A document scanned by any machine that attempts to do some OCR will automatically create 'text boxes' around where it thinks text is..and that information, when the scan is saved into a pdf, will remain. Illustrator sees these and will give you the nice blue outlines you see. These items are not ungroupeable, nor modifiable. I've seen teh same thing happen when I scanned a photo of my mother at age 5-6. The OCR will put boxes around the weirdest shit.


A negative means a photo, which means shadows off the embossing. A scan on the other hand may not show embossing at all.
Click to expand...
hey man, don't let you facts and experience get in the way of their dipshit circus.
 
Let's just say, for the sake of argument, that Obama was not born an American. Does anyone here really want to see the turmoil & chaos that would erupt? Show us undeniable proof of his lack of citizenship or STFU. It's too late.
 
a very sober, rational opinion.

but on the other hand, president biden through 2012? how much worse could it get?
 
Biden could not become President. He was elected VP on an illegitimate ticket. Nothing following Bush could have happened.
 
If Obama was removed Biden goes in. -- I don't think thats the answer though.

The usurper needs to be beat at the polls (and beat hard). If he was removed for his illegitimacy we would see riots immediately. We're better off letting Zero golf every day. He will lose in 2012 and then riots will soon follow, and we will see them. Once Baraq gets the boot and we turn the country back in the right direction, the Loughner left will snap!

Lefty punks won't be able to handle reality, their panties will tighten-up and blow a gasket. Be ready for it, aim for che's star.
teabagy.jpg

​
 
Biden can't become President. His election was on a ticket that can't be elected. The Speaker is the only option.
 
The process happened and he was certified, the election it stands. The only action would be to remove him and follow the succession laws, that's' biden.
 
It would be a SCotUS case for sure. A certified illegitimate election?
 
Birther Bombshell: Corsi To Release Evidence Proving Obama Certificate a Fraudulent Composite

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars
May 18, 2011

During an interview with a Denver radio station this morning, author Jerome Corsi said he was about to release bombshell evidence that proved the alleged Obama birth certificate released last month was a composite of three different birth certificates from other individuals born at the same hospital.

“I’m going to be telling the entire world about this scandal over the next few weeks,” Corsi said in a separate interview. “This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.”

As the video below explains, another aspect of the birth certificate pointing to forgery is the fact that the electronic PDF document released by the White House clearly shows evidence of ‘kerning’ – where parts of letters overlap each other for a pleasing visual effect – this is produced by modern computers and was not possible on 1960′s typewriters.

As Corsi explains in the interview, the amateur nature of the botched birth certificate is likely because Obama had to use people within his inner circle to produce the document, he could not hire a professional company to do so because of the danger that someone would blow the whistle.

In a related development, Joseph Farah, the publisher of Corsi’s book, Where’s the Birth Certificate?, is considering suing Esquire Magazine for putting out a hoax article claiming that he ordered the book be recalled and was refunding customers who had purchased it.

“Obviously if it was intended as a parody, it was not very well executed, and quite honestly I can tell you that I believe there’s some very real damage done by this article, and I’m exploring our legal options right now,” Farah said. “I think there are potentially some issues like restraint of trade and possibly libel, I think most people looked at that article and believed I actually said those words, that is a real problem for Esquire.”

The fact that the establishment is putting out fake reports in an effort to derail the popularity of the book is another indication about how scared the system is of this information getting to a wider audience. This is an obvious ploy to sabotage the book by fooling retailers and disrupting the supply chain.

Like Corsi, Farah says that he is “100 percent certain” that the long form birth certificate released by Obama last month is a “fraudulent, bogus document.”

“We feel like Woodward and Bernstein in the early days of Watergate when nobody was reporting the story, and finally the New York Times came along,” Farah told Talking Points Memo.
Click to expand...

Source

Obama Bombshell: New Birth Certificate a Forgery

Alex Jones & Aaron Dykes
Infowars.com
May 19, 2011

Alex Jones addresses the latest revelations about the phony document presented by the Obama White House as proof of his eligibility for high office.

Author Jerome Corsi has now become the target of White House dirty tricks coinciding with the release of his new book, ‘Where is the Birth Certificate?‘ Corsi has not backed down, but rather renewed his charges, asserting that the long-form birth certificate just released by Obama is a composite forgery made up of several real birth certificates. He has stated his intent to validate these claims in coming media interviews, including a scheduled appearance on the Alex Jones Show this Friday, May 20, 2011.

Pro-Obama factions have panicked, using a deceptive “satire” piece published in Esquire under the title “BREAKING: Jerome Corsi’s Birther Book Pulled from Shelves!” in attempt to sabotage Corsi’s books sales and public support. Simultaneously, Obama’s re-election campaign is trying to score 2012 points by mocking “birthers” with a new campaign shirt that reads “Made in America” with Obama’s image and his purported birth certificate.

But why would the White House even care about best-selling authors like Jerome Corsi (notoriously behind the John Kerry Swift Boat book) or fringe “birthers” if the released document gives all necessary proof to silence the doubters? As the Latin phrase res ipsa loquitur indicates, the thing should speak for itself. In other words, the truth lies in the evidence not the pitch for the case.
Click to expand...

Source
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top