One Victory

Winky said:
Homoness and ploinkin' children are both
unnatural. One in the same. So inevitably gayness
marriage will become sanctioned and the law of the land
and as now the molesters are released into society
(2 million) to continue their trade.

Molesting kids has gone from a crime, today just
a mental illness, tomorrow it will be seen as a
"sexual preference” as fags are today.
If you can not see the progression
that's not my problem.
Click to expand...
now that is one of the more inventive leaps, homosexuality and pedophilia being the same thing.
where is the other standard argument? you know, the one about sex with animals and marrying your dog. that one has been one of my favorites for awhile. saving that as the coup de grace?
 
Yeah Spooty,
What bidness is it of mine if mah neighbor wants to
plook his dawg in the privacy of his own bedroom.

Anyone who would condemn dawg plookin' is a
Dawg-plooka-phobe. We needa law legitimizin'
Dawg plookin' !

Them Dawg plookers have been persecuted long enough!
 
So whatever consenting adults want to do is fine with you.

Not to mention, we need to ram said practices by force of law, down the throats of a public
that has clearly voted in numerous elections voicing their opposition?

(I could have better constructed those sentences but at this point I’m wearing thin,
read ‘re-read’? that article and tell me where that dood is wrong!)

I really wonder how many people who are successfully (do I have to define that one fer ya?)
married and have kids, support Queer marriage?
 
rrfield said:
WinkieDink, it's called consenting adults. Too much Magic Bus for you.
Click to expand...

Crapola, next you'll try and weasel out with some poop
about how a doggie can not consent?

Not that Dawgy plookin' is somehow incorrect behavior.

Oh no heaven forbid you or anyone else should be allowed to make a judgment regarding what is acceptable behavior.

You'd even take it a step further and legislate such things.

Hmm I wonder how long it will be before laws against bestiality will come under the scrutiny of the supreme Court?!?

The same Court that recently ruled that we need to continue reverse discrimination
and the Texas law agin sodomy was (WTF) unconstitutional (WTF)?
 
Not to mention, we need to ram said practices by force of law, down the throats of a public
that has clearly voted in numerous elections voicing their opposition?
Click to expand...
its been done before or have you forgotten the entire civil rights movement?
i seem to recall that the majority of folks were against that too.

I really wonder how many people who are successfully (do I have to define that one fer ya?)
married and have kids, support Queer marriage?
Click to expand...
yes. define that for me. how long does one have to be married to be succssfully married? i'm thinking that once you say "i do" you are successfully married.
 
God, you people sicken me.



Y'know what? Go right ahead and support the fudge packers. Go ahead and support anyone who decides that "whatever anyone wants has to be allowed". It's called anarchy, you idiots. Moral Decay. Personally, I'm following SnP's idea, and looking into 100 acres of land a few hundred miles north of what you so tragically refer to as civilisation. You can stay and wallow in the sewer you're filling.
 
Any moral wrong undermines the common good and therefore harms all members of society.
Click to expand...
So how many have to believe it's not a moral wrong before it's not?

Human nature defines the properties of marriage as between a man and a woman with the primary purpose of procreation and the education of children.
Click to expand...
Wrong, Churches define that, not Human Nature.

We are not free to alter marriage’s essential purpose or properties. These do not depend on the will of the contracting parties but are rooted in natural law which does not change.
Click to expand...
We're not? So we can't change anything that "natural law" has written? Can I get a copy of those "natural laws"?

The minute it is socially and legally accepted by society, we will all feel the enormous psychological pressure to renounce our moral and religious convictions.
Click to expand...
Ok. So as soon as it passes, I can expect to see our local pastors out in the streets fucking dogs. Right?



I'll get the rest later, gotta get back to work.
 
PT said:
I'll get to (sic) the rest later
Click to expand...

Don't bother you've fucked up so badly so far
there is no way in Hell you can improve on your fiasco.

You’ll simply make yerself look even sillier.

*slaps a stamp on the natural law booklet for PT*
 
paul_valaru said:
honestly, why waste your time, you know you have good points, but some people have blinders of self Rightness that can't be removed
Click to expand...
It's either this or spread the moral indecency through my workplace. Don't shit where you eat, ya know?
 
PT said:
It's either this or spread the moral indecency through my workplace. Don't shit where you eat, ya know?
Click to expand...


very true, ok, let's spread some, GAY PEOPLE HAVE RIGHTS, thye are not sub human, and just cause a book written years and years after christ died says it's wrong, doesn't make it wrong, it is just a book.
 
Yup that's all it is
and what most people think about this subject
they are just thoughts
and there isn't any reason on earth the rules shouldn't be changed to fit less than ten percent of the population
the aberrant 10% by the way.
 
Winky said:
Yup that's all it is
and what most people think about this subject
they are just thoughts
and there isn't any reason on earth the rules shouldn't be changed to fit less than ten percent of the population
the aberrant 10% by the way.
Click to expand...


what about all the other aberrant people in the world, you know, the ones who don't think as you do.
 
The rules must be changed to accommodate them too.

And you'd be surprised (shocked even) how many people
believe as I do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top