MitchSchaft
New Member
I know I could've. 

Ardsgaine said:Were you on another planet last year when those planes slammed into the Twin Towers? We're already at war, the only question is whether we're going to fight or not. This isn't about playing policeman, it's about defending the country. You can argue until the cows come home about which of the countries over there we should attack first, but that's a question of how the war should be fought, not whether it should be fought.
Squiggy said:I don't think anyone is willing to commit to that Gato. That was my original question on the subject and I don't recall seeing a definitive answer yet.
Squiggy said:I've already conceeded that point in one of these threads Ards. But that takes us back to the logic of "Why isn't Saudi Arabia next on our list?". !5 of the 19 hijackers can't be dismissed as insignificant. But thats a whole other discussion.
RD said:If it were a MAJOR WAR one in which everything was at risk, such as WWI and WWII, it would be another matter I suppose.
Ards said:I do not blame men who refuse to fight in such wars
Gonz said:Ards said:I do not blame men who refuse to fight in such wars
If they join the military of their own free will & war, of any kind, breaks out during their enlistment & they refuse to fight. Cool. 20 years in the brig ought to teach them. They can not expect the perks of military life & then back out when the going gets tough.