you gonna answer this dude?
I don't answer rhetorical questions. Apparently, you think it isn't, so I will defer to you.
um, hey, why didn't you share this a couple days ago?
I was waiting to see if any of you Libs were going to bring it up; but apparently you guys only watch the damning news and ignore anything exculpatory.
and what does this chatter you've posted mean?
I thought it to be quite self explainatory but, if you need clarification, here goes.
She has maintained all along that the firing of Monegan was for reasons other than what
he is claiming. These e-mails and documents clearly show that AT THAT TIME he was being discussed because of his tendency to buck his boss. It also shows that he was insubordinate on more than one occasion and tried to do his own "shadow government" thing.
she shared some memos and painted this monegan guy as insubordinate?
She shared ALL OF THE PERTINENT MEMOS on the case which clearly show that he was INDEED, not just "painted ... as", insubordinate.
[qoute]i don't see anything about "releasing ALL emails" jimbo. this says nothing.[/QUOTE]
She released all PERTINENT memos. There was no reason to release memos on the bids for the new roof for city hall. You just want to cloud the issue with a flurry of impertinent documents hoping the ones that show her to be correct are lost in the shuffle.
Too bad. She skunked you ... again.