Porn star wannabes cry out...and then there was silence

paul_valaru

100% Pure Canadian Beef
No more Kamikazi bukkake attacks

(my opinion, good law, it is sexual assault)
Senate Seals No-Contact Sex Assault Loophole
April 12, 2006
By CHRISTOPHER KEATING, Capitol Bureau Chief Outraged by an incident in a University of Connecticut dormitory, the state Senate voted unanimously Tuesday to change the definition of sexual assault to include cases without direct physical contact.

Lawmakers were responding to the case of three UConn students accused of ejaculating onto a female student's face as she slept in a dormitory in September. The three men, who no longer attend the university, were charged with disorderly conduct and public indecency, but could not be charged with sexual assault under state law.


The incident caused widespread outrage as the state's victim advocate, chief state's attorney, women's groups and legislators vowed to close the loophole. The problem is that the existing legal definition of sexual assault requires "contact" between the victim and the perpetrator.

The alleged victim, who has stayed out of the public eye, strongly supported the bill in written testimony delivered to the legislature.

"This may actually force potential, as well as existing, sexual predators to understand that ejaculating on a person's face is not in fact funny, normal, or an act that can easily be dismissed by a misdemeanor," she said. "Although the refinement of this law will not improve my situation or case, at least I'll be able to live at ease knowing that no other innocent person will be taken advantage of by both a sexual predator and by the law."

The new law would help restore "the pride, self-worth, and safety of myself and other women victimized by thoughtless individuals such as the three men who sexually violated me and will only be convicted of a misdemeanor at best," she said.

Before its 35-0 vote Tuesday, the Senate placed the item on the "consent calendar" of non-controversial items that are passed without debate. Some lawmakers said the bill was approved on consent because some of their colleagues were uncomfortable speaking about the lurid details of the UConn case.

The bill still requires approval by the House of Representatives and Gov. M. Jodi Rell. House Speaker James Amann, D-Milford, said Tuesday that he is "very supportive" of the bill and said the chamber would vote before the May 3 adjournment.

"These instances come up that are unexpected, and we scratch our head and say, `Why don't we have a law for this?"' said Amann, a leader in writing the state's version of "Megan's Law" regarding sexual assaults. "That incident [at UConn] is pretty bizarre and horrific."

The criminal cases are still pending against the three former students: Martin V. Piscottano, 19, of 72 Root Road, Somers; Jared Skvirsky, 20, of Brookline, Mass.; and Zak A. Brohinsky, 19, of 299 Old Farms Road, Simsbury. Brohinsky is the son of university relations director Scott Brohinsky, a frequent lobbyist at the state Capitol for the university.

Although the incident happened in September, it did not come to light until February. At that point, lawmakers started the process to change the law.

The incident began in Skvirsky's dorm room in Watson Hall, where he and the female student arrived after meeting at a party at the off-campus Carriage House Apartments. She fell asleep on a futon before Brohinsky - Skvirsky's roommate - returned home with Piscottano, according to a police affidavit.

The three men, according to the affidavit, watched a pornographic video on a computer and took turns ejaculating on the student's face and body. When the woman woke up, she thought she had drooled on herself, the affivadit says. The next day, the affidavit says, Skvirsky sent the woman an instant message that stated that they "were really drunk" and had ejaculated on her.

Sen. Edith Prague, a Columbia Democrat who has a master's degree from UConn, said the incident was "absolutely disgusting," and the legislature had an obligation to close the legal loophole.

"Kids do crazy things. It's terrible," Prague said. "We have to take care of situations like that. That's what we're here for."

Sen. Biagio "Billy" Ciotto, a Wethersfield Democrat, said, "What can you say about something like that? It's sad. It's awful."

Rep. Michael P. Lawlor, an East Haven Democrat who is co-chairman of the legislature's judiciary committee, said that cases with similar circumstances would now qualify as fourth-degree sexual assault, rather than breach of peace or public indecency.

"This would make clear what everybody thought was already the law," said Sen. Andrew McDonald, D-Stamford, who is co-chairman of the judiciary committee with Lawlor. "But for this extraordinary situation that came out of UConn, I don't think anybody thought we'd need legislation like this."
 

paul_valaru

100% Pure Canadian Beef
Buncha guys wacked off on a girls face, she complained to the cops (as she should) and found there was no law against it, now there is.
 

Dave

Well-Known Member
hear ! hear!
its about time. these drunked bukkake incidents have become a national disgrace.
 

Gato_Solo

Out-freaking-standing OTC member
paul_valaru said:
Buncha guys wacked off on a girls face, she complained to the cops (as she should) and found there was no law against it, now there is.

I know what bukkake is. It was a "huh" over the whole incident. *handonhip
 

AlphaTroll

New Member
paul_valaru said:
Guys being jerks

Being jerk-offs.

It's disgusting that men would do something like that. Wonder if they'd think it funny if they woke p and found themselves arse-raped by a bunch of women with strap-ons?
 

BeardofPants

New Member
Not 'whatev', winky. If the person in question is not a consenting individual to the sex act, as this girl clearly wasn't, then throw the fucking book at the perpetuators. How dare you just write off something like this. She never consented to it. *handonhip
 

AlphaTroll

New Member
Says the fact that she was sleeping while it happened and that the guy felt the need to text her the next day to tell her what happened.
 

Winky

Well-Known Member
this type of silliness

(changing the law to elevate an incident such as this
to the level of fourth degree sexual assault)

degrades the whole concept sexual assault

don't get drunk outta yer mind
(yeah I slept through the whole thing)
and passout around shit-head guys

If they'd a gang raped her (I suppose she'd
woked up for that?) then fry their asses
 

AlphaTroll

New Member
It's sexual violation of a person, it should be criminalised. It does not degrade the concept of sexual assualt, it broadens the spectrum.
 

BeardofPants

New Member
Gah. You think just because there was not penises touching her, that it somehow makes it any less questionable than if they'd stuck 'em in a hole?? It's fucking sexual assault, and it was done to someone who didn't consent to it. Eesh.
 

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
Why do we need 3 laws? 2 apparently weren't enough to stop these morons, so another will do what exactly?
 

simplyred

New Member
Gonz said:
Why do we need 3 laws? 2 apparently weren't enough to stop these morons, so another will do what exactly?

Well no a third may not stop it, but it makes it punishable.

And anyone who has a wife, daughter, sister, mother, aunt, cousin, grandmother, have I covered the basis...should wonder how they would feel if this had happend to someone they loved. Unconsenting sex is unconsenting sex no matter how you look at it. TWO parties did not say YES. Penetration may not have been involved, but sexual acts did occur none the less. Someone needed to be punished. Good for her for standing up for herself.
 

Winky

Well-Known Member
Nope
nope and

nope...

This is right in line with the cop pretending to be
a 14 year old gurl on IM

This event trivializes real assaults

While what happened might fall into the icky category

it sure as hell pales by comparison to Rape
or sexual battery.

While what they did may be considered tasteless
(but a bit salty) it doesn't quite rise to the level of baby raping in anyone's lawbook?

But will brand them sex criminals for life by your standards?

Sheesh a playboy centerfold pic inna firehouse is grounds for
a sexual harassment suit and she wouldn’t even have know she was
assaulted unless one of the perps tex'd her?

Moral of the story don’t get slobbering drunk with assholes and pass out!

“Whata ya in for Kid?”
“jizzin’ onna drunk chick, why what did you do?”
“ah ya know the usual kidnapping rape murder ya know the stuff they used to
put ya in the big house for heh”

Yep we gotta change the law!

What’s next victimless rape?
 

BeardofPants

New Member
And that's where we differ. IMO an act like this is on par with full penetration rape.

<edit> and your argument doesn't wash. You might as well say that a woman who wears a short skirt deserves to be raped. The fact of the matter is that she was an unwilling participant, and they should be punished for it. You may not mind 3 guys coming on your face whilst you're asleep, but I certainly don't stand for it.
 

Winky

Well-Known Member
be silly all you want

BeardofPants said:
an act like this is on par with full penetration rape

did ja know there are indeed varying degrees

penetration without consent

with the threat of violence

with actual violence

resulting in injury

resulting in permanent debilitating\disfiguring injury

and on and on and on...

Just because the thought of being jized on without
your consent seems like a major insult
(I suppose if I spit on you I should face a firing squad)
doesn’t make it a mind boggling life destroying event!

(that you supposedly slept through anyway heh heh)

as I said before ‘whatev’

there are far worse things taking place at this very instant
in time all over this planet to wimen’s and we’ve got to
get worked up over some love juice gon’ where it shouldn’ta oughta

woo woo
 
Top