S. Korea opens stem cell bank

Stem cell pioneer steps down over egg ethics
'Shameful and horrible'
By Lucy Sherriff
Published Thursday 24th November 2005 14:33 GMT

Pioneering stem cell researcher Professor Hwang Woo-Suk has stepped down from his position as Chairman of the World Stem Cell Hub, after it emerged that he used eggs from his own researchers in his work.

The story was first picked up by the journal Nature, after an interview with one of Hwang's PhD students in which she claimed to have donated her Ova. The journal put the allegations to Hwang, but he denied that any of his students had donated eggs for his research and blamed the student' poor English for the misunderstanding.

Suspicions were raised again earlier this month when one of Hwang's colleagues', Gerald Schatten, ended their collaboration. He cited concerns over the origins of the eggs the team was using.

This week the South Korean Health and Welfare Ministry confirmed that two junior researchers had indeed donated their ova for the professor's research two years ago.

Resigning from all his official posts, Hwang said: "I am very sorry that I have to tell the public words that are too shameful and horrible."

Despite this, the Seoul University Ethics panel has stated that there was no illegality or ethic breach in what had happened. After reviewing written testimony from 34 researchers and interviewing the women in question, it concluded that the two women made their donations before the current Life Ethics and Safety Law came into effect, Chosun Ilbo reports.

The panel also said that the women made their donations under false names, and that Professor Hwang was not aware of their decision. ®

source
 
The panel also said that the women made their donations under false names, and that Professor Hwang was not aware of their decision.

So...why is he quitting then? Because his students have dishonored him?
 
"I am very sorry that I have to tell the public words that are too shameful and horrible," Hwang said, appearing downcast and solemn before a packed news conference. "I should be here reporting the successful results of our research, but I'm sorry instead to have to apologize."

"The responsibility for all disputes and controversy lies on me," Hwang said. "I will not make any excuse."


...

As the scientists' egg donations were neither "coerced or coaxed" nor "aimed at making profit," there has been "no violation of ethics guidelines," Health Ministry spokesman Choi Hee-joo told a news conference.

...

"Ethics and science are the two wheels that drive the civilization of mankind," Hwang said. "Scientific research should be conducted within the boundaries of ethics but in reality, there were some cases in which the ethics regulations backing (quickly developing) science had not been in place."

...

The payments to egg donors, which ended in 2003, were not illegal at the time. However, Hwang has previously insisted that all eggs obtained for his research were made by donors who gave them in hopes of helping his work.



Under commonly observed international guidelines, scientists are advised to be cautious when using human subjects for research who are in a dependent relationship with them — a precaution against exploitation.

Hwang said he and one of the scientists who gave her eggs were previously unaware of the guideline. "I have learned a painful lesson that I should conduct research in a calm and cautious manner by living up to a global standard," he said.
Hwang Responds
 
Yupp....kudos to him for doing it...despite not doing any wrong.

Now...if the research can just be allowed to go on..that'd be a good thing too!
 
Mice grow human brain cells after stem cell injections: published study

By PAUL ELIAS




SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - Add another creation to the strange scientific menagerie where animal species are being mixed together in ever more exotic combinations.

Scientists announced Monday that they had created mice with small amounts of human brain cells in an effort to make realistic models of neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease. Led by Fred Gage of the Salk Institute in San Diego, the researchers created the mice by injecting about 100,000 human embryonic stem cells per mouse into the brains of 14-day-old rodent embryos.

Those mice were each born with about 0.1 per cent of human cells in each of their heads, a trace amount that doesn't remotely come close to "humanizing" the rodents.

"This illustrates that injecting human stem cells into mouse brains doesn't restructure the brain," Gage said.

Still, the work adds to the growing ethical concerns of mixing human and animal cells when it comes to stem cell and cloning research. After all, mice are 97.5 per cent genetically identical to humans.

"The worry is if you humanize them too much you cross certain boundaries," said David Magnus, director of the Stanford Medical Center for Biomedical Ethics. "But I don't think this research comes even close to that."

Researchers are nevertheless beginning to bump up against what bioethicists call the "yuck factor."

Three top cloning researchers, for instance, have applied for a patent that contemplates fusing a complete set of human DNA into animal eggs in order to manufacturer human embryonic stem cells.

One of the patent applicants, Jose Cibelli, first attempted such an experiment in 1998 when he fused cells from his cheek into cow eggs.

"The idea is to hijack the machinery of the egg," said Cibelli, whose current work at Michigan State University does not involve human material because that would violate state law.

Researchers argue that co-mingling human and animal tissue is vital to ensuring that experimental drugs and new tissue replacement therapies are safe for people.

Others have performed similar experiments with rabbit and chicken eggs while University of California-Irvine researchers have reported making paralyzed rodents walk after injecting them with human nerve cells.

Doctors have transplanted pig valves into human hearts for years, and scientists have injected human cells into lab animals for even longer. But the brain poses an additional level of concern because some envision nightmare scenarios in which a human mind might be trapped in an animal head.

"Human diseases, such as Parkinson's disease, might be amenable to stem cell therapy, and it is conceivable, although unlikely, that an animal's cognitive abilities could also be affected by such therapy," a report issued in April by the influential National Academies of Science that sought to draw some ethical research boundaries.

So the report recommended that such work be allowed, but with strict ethical guidelines established.

"Protocols should be reviewed to ensure that they take into account those sorts of possibilities and that they include ethically sensitive plans to manage them if they arise," the report concluded.

At the same time, the report did endorse research that co-mingles human and animal tissue as vital to ensuring that experimental drugs and new tissue replacement therapies are safe for people.

Gage said the work published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences is another step in overcoming one of the biggest technical hurdles confronting stem cell researchers: when exactly to inject the cells into patients.

The results suggest that human embryonic stem cells, once injected into people, will mature into the cells that surround them. No known human has ever received an injection of embryonic stem cells because so little is known about how those cells will mature once inside the body.

For now, Gage said his work is more geared toward understanding disease than to finding a cure.

"It's a way for us to begin to tease out the way these diseases develop," Gage said.

Human embryonic stem cells are created in the first days after conception and give rise to all the organs and tissues in the human body. Scientists hope they can someday use stem cells to replace diseased tissue. But many social conservatives, including U.S. President George W. Bush, oppose the work because embryos are destroyed during research.

Stem cell researchers argue that mixing human and animal cells is the only way to advance the field because it's far too risky to experiment on people; so little is known about stem cells.

"The experiments have to be done, which does mean human cells into non-human cells," said Dr. Evan Snyder, a stem cell researcher at the Burnham Institute in San Diego. "You don't work out the issues on your child or your grandmother. You want to work this out in an animal first."

Snyder is injecting human embryonic stem cells into monkeys and is convinced that there's little danger.

"It's true that there is a huge amount of similarity, but the difference are huge," Snyder said. "You will never ever have a little human trapped inside a mouse or monkey's body."

Source

Yup. Now there's a good idea.
 
Merry Christmas Prof
A landmark 2004 paper in which South Korean scientists claimed to have cloned human stem cells for the first time contains photos that appeared in an unrelated paper, calling their claim into question and increasing the controversy that surrounds the team.

Two photos in the 2004 paper, published to great fanfare in the journal Science, claim to show batches of the world's first cloned human embryonic stem cells. Yet the same photos appear in the journal Molecules and Cells, in a research article by another Korean team, submitted before the Science paper, and in that paper both photos are labeled as cells created without cloning.

Bostondotcom
 
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - South Korean researcher Hwang Woo-suk faked results of at least nine of 11 stem-cell lines he claimed to have created, a deliberate deception that has undermined the credibility of science, his university said Friday.

Source
 
SKorea's top university says leading researcher falsified all stem-cell lines
By BO-MI LIM




SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - South Korea's top university said Thursday that a leading researcher fabricated all of the stem cells he said were cloned from individual patients - a shattering blow to the disgraced scientist's reputation as a medical pioneer.

The conclusion continued the erosion of Hwang Woo-suk's once-vaunted reputation as a leader in the field of cloning who held the key to breakthroughs for hard-to-treat diseases.

A panel from Seoul National University investigating Hwang's work said last week at least nine of the 11 patient-specific stem cell lines reported this year in the journal Science were fabricated. On Thursday, the panel said the remaining two were also faked.

"The panel couldn't find stem cells that match patients' DNA regarding the 2005 paper and it believes that Hwang's team doesn't have scientific data to prove that (such stem cells) were made," Roe Jung-hye, the university's dean of research affairs, told reporters.

The latest revelations are a setback for research into stem cells, master cells that can grow into any body tissue.

Creating patient-specific stem cells would be a breakthrough because they would not be rejected by patients' individual immune systems. Scientists hope to someday use such cells to cure Alzheimer's, diabetes and paralysis.

"The bottom line is that it's a major disaster to our whole field because the expectations were so high and now we are back to square one," said Joseph Itskovitz, a stem cell researcher and director of the department of obstetrics and gynecology at Rambam Medical Centre in Haifa, Israel.

Hwang's whereabouts were unknown and he could not be reached for comment. A mobile phone number he gave to journalists has been changed.

Hwang shot to international fame last year when he published an article in Science claiming that he had created the world's first cloned human embryo and extracted stem cells from it. This year, he and his research team published an article in the journal Nature claiming they had produced the world's first cloned dog, an Afghan hound named Snuppy.

Those breakthroughs - which are now also under suspicion - catapulted the veterinarian, dubbed "The Pride of Korea," into the role of national hero. The government responded with pledges of massive financial support.

But trouble began for Hwang last month when he admitted, after more than a year of denial, that he had used eggs donated by lab workers, in violation of ethics guidelines. He also acknowledged that some of the eggs he used were bought. He had claimed that all the eggs were donated.

Then this month, a former colleague alleged that at least nine of the stem cell lines that Hwang said he had created through cloning were faked. He did not elaborate on the allegation but the accusation sparked an investigation by Hwang's university.

Last Friday, after the university's disclosure that at least nine stem cell lines were faked, Hwang, 53, apologized for the fabrication and stepped down as professor at the university.

Biotech shares on the Seoul stock market took another hit Thursday after declining on the university's initial report. Medipost Co., which develops therapies using stem cells from umbilical cord blood, fell 7.1 per cent. Innocell Corp., which specializes in cell therapies, plunged 10.6 per cent.

Despite Hwang's fall from grace, some were not ready to give up the dreams that his claims inspired.

"Our confidence in Hwang remains unchanged," said Jung Jin-owan, 40, secretary general of the Korea Spinal Cord Injury Association.

"As we didn't hear directly from Hwang about the result, we would like to believe that he created patient-specific stem cells," added Jung, who was paralyzed from the waist down in a 1987 traffic accident.

The South Korean government, which last week strongly suggested it would stop supporting Hwang, reacted cautiously.

"We don't have an official position over today's report as Seoul National University's investigation is still under way," said Nam Sang-mun, a spokesman for the Science and Technology Ministry.

Hwang filed a complaint with prosecutors last Friday that some of the stem cell lines his team created were replaced by those made at Seoul's Mizmedi Hospital, which had collaborated with his research team.

Roe said while the university's investigation found that some of Hwang's purported stem cell lines originated from Mizmedi, probing any possible switch was beyond the scope of the panel.

Prosecutors said last week they are waiting for the university investigation to be completed before launching their own investigation.

Source


I guess this is what happens when you let politicians dictate ethics

"It's the politicians' role to deal properly with the controversy over life ethics so that it cannot block scientific research and progress."
 
This story has no end

SEOUL (Reuters) - A South Korean scientist whose work on tailored embryonic stem cells has been discredited, coerced junior female colleagues on his team to donate their own eggs for his research, a television network reported late on Tuesday.

A spokesman for Seoul National University said on Wednesday its panel investigating Hwang Woo-suk for scientific fraud would not comment on the allegation until it releases its final findings next week.

Hwang, who claimed in a landmark 2005 paper he had made a breakthrough in therapeutic cloning research, was dealt a devastating blow last week by the panel, which said none of his work, published in the journal Science, could be proved.

Reuters
 
Let's see. Politicians laying the ethics groundrules, leading to coerced junior female colleagues. Never would have seen that one coming.
 
Final tally

Scientist's stem cell claims faked
By BO-MI LIM - Associated Press

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — An academic panel investigating the work of South Korean researcher Hwang Woo-suk said Tuesday he faked his landmark claim to have cloned human embryonic stem cells — capping the spectacular fall of a man once lauded as a pioneer in the field.

The latest revelation by the Seoul National University panel was sure to be a huge disappointment to scientists and patients alike. Hwang’s breakthrough cloning claim had offered hope to millions of people suffering from paralysis and debilitating diseases, such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and AIDS.

It followed a finding by the same panel last month that Hwang’s claim in 2005 to have developed 11 patient-specific stem cell lines also was false.

Hwang “did not have any proof to show that cloned embryonic stem cells were ever created,” the panel said in a report, disputing claims in Hwang’s 2004 paper in the journal Science. In the paper, Hwang said he had cloned a human embryo and extracted stem cells from it.

However, the panel upheld Hwang’s claims last year to have created the world’s first cloned dog, an Afghan hound named Snuppy. The journal Nature, which published Hwang’s cloned-dog article, said Tuesday preliminary results from its independent tests also showed Snuppy was indeed a clone.

That achievement was not regarded as important as the cloning of human cells, however, as various animals had already been cloned.

Scientists hope to someday use human stem cells — master cells that can grow into any body tissue — to battle a number of diseases. Creating stem cells genetically matched to a specific patient would be a breakthrough because they would not be rejected by the patient’s immune systems.


But despite years of research, Hwang was the only person to claim success in extracting the cells from an embryo.

“The 2004 paper was written on fabricated data to show that the stem cells match the DNA of the provider although they didn’t,” the report said.

The reputation of the 53-year-old Hwang — once dubbed “The Pride of Korea” — has eroded steadily in recent months with increasing questions about his work.

In December, a devastating report by the university, where Hwang conducted much of his research, concluded that he had fabricated another article published in Science last year. The university’s nine-member investigative panel said it could not find any of the 11 stem cell lines matched to patients, as Hwang reported in that research.

Science has said it would retract that May 2005 paper and investigate Hwang’s 2004 paper that claimed the first cloned human embryo.

Hwang had also come under fire for using eggs in his studies donated by junior researchers on his team. He conceded in November that two subordinate scientists had donated eggs without his knowledge and that other women were paid to take fertility drugs to produce eggs for research.

Both practices are viewed as coercive and unethical in the West.

The panel said Tuesday that one of the two researchers who donated eggs said Hwang accompanied her to a clinic for the procedure. Hwang also received letters from female scientists on his team pledging to donate eggs, the panel said.

The concerns over the egg donations caused Hwang’s sole American collaborator, University of Pittsburgh researcher Gerald Schatten, to end his 20-month partnership with Hwang’s team in November. He also asked Science to remove him as senior author of the May 2005 paper.

Alan Trounson, a top stem cell researcher and expert in embryonic stem cells at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, said he was “very, very disappointed.”

“I just don’t understand why a scientist would do something like that,” he said.

Hwang has not made any public appearances since last month when he said he would resign his faculty position, and his whereabouts are unknown. Hwang said earlier that despite any scandal over faked results, he has the technology to clone stem cells and could reproduce his experiments.

The university condemned his fabrications.

“This conduct cannot but be seen as an act that fools the whole scientific community and the public,” Tuesday’s report said. “Just based on the facts of the fabrications that have been disclosed, the penalty has to be severe.”

Trounson said Hwang’s fabrications will have a negative impact on research but added the field remains promising.

“I am very confident that embryonic stem cells will provide us with some very important new regenerative medicine strategy,” he said. “It’s just that we will have to wait a little longer.”

Research such as Hwang’s is off-limits in many U.S. labs because Washington restricts federal money for human embryonic stem cell experiments. Labs that depend on federal money cannot use it to create new embryonic cell lines as Hwang claimed he did.

A South Korean scientist said Hwang’s downfall could give new impetus for other laboratories to push forward with stem-cell development.

It can “serve as an opportunity for other scientists to expedite research in the area,” said Park Se-pill, a stem cell scientist who heads the Maria Infertility Medical Institute in Seoul.

Simon Best, chairman of the London-based BioIndustry Association, said, “There remains a huge need for new and better treatments for degenerative diseases and this, in no way, diminishes the potential of stem-cell technology to provide these.”

Ordinary people expressed anger with Hwang, who has been a role model in a society that places great emphasis on education and scholarship.

“My daughter got really disappointed to learn that professor Hwang lied,” said Park Jae-hyung, 48, visiting Seoul with his 12-year-old daughter from the southern port city of Busan. “I think this is the result of Koreans’ hasty culture.”

South Korean prosecutors are preparing their own investigation into Hwang’s work. South Korean media have said that Hwang, who received massive government funding for his research, may face charges of misappropriation of funds.

Hwang had become a national hero in South Korea before his scientific advances fell under question.

He was designated the country’s first-ever “top scientist” in June by the government, winning special funding. Korean Air even gave Hwang and his wife free first-class flights for a decade, calling the scientist a “national treasure."

source


Draw your own conclusions.
 
I conclude that it's a crying shame.

but...

as your article put it...

Simon Best, chairman of the London-based BioIndustry Association, said, “There remains a huge need for new and better treatments for degenerative diseases and this, in no way, diminishes the potential of stem-cell technology to provide these.”
 
MrBishop said:
I conclude that it's a crying shame.

but...

as your article put it...

Simon Best, chairman of the London-based BioIndustry Association, said, “There remains a huge need for new and better treatments for degenerative diseases and this, in no way, diminishes the potential of stem-cell technology to provide these.”

But it does highly accentuate the need to ethical and moral review in the manner in which these treatments are developed.
 
"...in no way, diminishes the potential of stem-cell technology to provide these.”

They keep saying potential & keep coming up empty. I'm glad my government has enough sense to realize it's a money pit & it's the job of the private sector to find ways around that pit.
 
Despite fraud, patients and advocates hope for future stem cell therapy
By MALCOLM RITTER




NEW YORK (AP) - Having spent 23 years in a wheelchair, Wall Street analyst Henry Stifel keeps a close eye on spinal cord research. And he says the latest scientific scandal in South Korea has not dimmed his hope that stem cells may one day help people like him.

"Some research was discredited. It doesn't discredit all the research that's been achieved," said Stifel, who is quadriplegic.

Moira McCarthy Stanford of Plymouth, Mass., whose 14-year-old daughter is diabetic and uses an insulin pump, had a more personal reaction to the news that South Korean researcher Hwang Woo-suk had fabricated results for a landmark 2004 stem-cell paper.

"It's kind of sad a scientist would do this to people like us," she said. But "I know so many scientists are out there who are honest and working hard to move this forward, that this (fraud) will all be a distant memory in a couple years."

Diabetes, spinal cord injury and Parkinson's disease are among the conditions scientists hope to treat someday by using embryonic stem cells. Officials of disease advocacy groups said Tuesday that they remained optimistic that stem cells will play a role in future treatment.

Some also said the Korean scandal shows stem cell work should be encouraged in the United States.

Hwang's fraud was revealed Monday night by an investigatory panel at Seoul National University, where Hwang claimed in 2004 his lab had cloned a human embryo and extracted stem cells from it.

That made headlines because such "therapeutic cloning" could lead to supplies of stem cells that are a genetic match for particular patients. If those cells could be turned into the appropriate tissue, it could theoretically be transplanted into patients as a treatment without fear of rejection.

But Hwang's announcement was a sham, the university panel found. (On the other hand, Hwang's separate claim last August - the first cloning of a dog - was legitimate, investigators said.) Last month, the same panel declared that last year's blockbuster paper by Hwang, in which he claimed he created 11 stem cell lines genetically matched to specific patients through embryo cloning, was also a fraud.

Both faked papers had been published by the journal Science, which said Tuesday it is reviewing its methods of handling scientific manuscripts. "We are determined to do everything in our power to evaluate our own procedures for detecting research misconduct," editor-in-chief Donald Kennedy said.

Hwang hasn't appeared in public since last month, when he said he would resign his faculty position. His whereabouts are unknown. With the discrediting of his papers, there is now no documented recovery of stem cells from cloned human embryos.

Stem cells can also be extracted from ordinary, uncloned human embryos, and advocates say that route could also lead to disease treatments. But that is controversial because it involves destroying the embryos. The Bush administration has banned federal funding for research on stem cell lines developed after August 2001.

That has been the main barrier to embryonic stem cell research in the United States, but the news of Hwang's fraud might give new support to calls for relaxing that ban, said Robin Elliott, executive director of the Parkinson's Disease Foundation.

Perhaps "people will feel you cannot outsource this kind of science, that you need to have things going on in what is by far the world's most prolific scientific engine," he said.

"We do have to go back some steps and start over on this particular avenue that Hwang was exploring. The question is, why should this not be done here?"

Stanford, the mother of the diabetic daughter, said she remains hopeful that stem cell research will produce new treatments for diabetes.

She recalled that when Hwang announced his now-discredited results in 2004, "that was literally a day when parents like me jumped up and down and cheered, and we were buzzing back and forth across the Internet.

"Now it's disappointing to know we were scammed by someone. But at the same time ... I think there's going to be another day that we jump up and down, and that time it will be the real thing.

Source

One simple word, but so much horror brought with it. I've said it before, and I'll say it again. If scientists are allowed to destroy embryos for stem cells, you may as well allow poor children to be harvested for organs, because it amounts to the same damn thing.
 
Gonz said:
They keep saying potential & keep coming up empty. I'm glad my government has enough sense to realize it's a money pit & it's the job of the private sector to find ways around that pit.
They already make use of adult stem cells, and have done so since 1956.
Bone Marrow Transplants.

They've also shown time and again that embryonic stem cells can be used to repair spinal injuries, grow organs, grow layers of skin etc etc... They're just not allowed to do human trials yet.

What they were trying to do in SK was to create their own embryos in order to avoid having to deal with the right-to-lifers, and their inane ideas about stem-cell research promoting abortion.
 
MrBishop said:
They've also shown time and again that embryonic stem cells can be used to repair spinal injuries, grow organs, grow layers of skin etc etc... They're just not allowed to do human trials yet.

Murder a baby to let someone who wrecked a motorcycle doing 150 mph, killing three other people in the process walk again. Yeah, that works.

What they were trying to do in SK was to create their own embryos in order to avoid having to deal with the right-to-lifers, and their inane ideas about stem-cell research promoting abortion.

Inane? Tell me, was Dolly any less alive for having been cloned? Or the dog this quack did manage to clone? Congrats, Bish. For proving me right. You want what you want, and you want it now, no matter what needs to be do to get it. Morals? Ethics? Fine and dandy unless they get in the way of what you want. Murdering children, ripping apart their unformed bodies? Sure, go for it. It might save some 70 year old with a coranary condition from shitting his pants. Inane? Where the fuck do you get off calling me and my opinions inane. You selfish, egotistical, greedy bastard.


Bish, lose my number. I don't know who you are, but obviously the guy I grew up with is dead. Probably destroyed to form you.

Good ridance.
 
Back
Top