Simpsons: Gay marriage shock
- Thread starter Lopan
- Start date
MrBishop
Well-Known Member
Back to the topic at hand for a moment - the same people who just complained about the Gay-Marriage on the Simpsons have claimed that Shrek II promotes homosexuality because
1) In one scene, Pinochio is seen wearing a thong
2) The Bartender *The Ugly Step Sister* (Voice by Larry King) in "The Poison Apple" is obviously a pre-op transexual.
3) Sexual innuendo
4) Racial tollerence themes (Ogres aren't being accepted as 'equal')
5) The overuse of Majik - which goes against the Bible
rebuttal
1) Wearing women's clothing (if you're a guy) is a fetish ... and is related to transvestism ... but often NOT related to homosexuality at all. This was a sight-gag, was funny as hell.
2) It's the Ugly step-sister - she's pretty ugly in the movie... a bit of a stretch (Larry King does a great job BTW)
3) Well...they ARE newly married, eh
4) Yup...good idea too
5) Hunh? Majik has been used in every fairy tale for eons...and they're complaining now? Time for a good ol' fashined book-burning. We'll start with Grim's Fairytales, go onto Mother Goose etc...
Sometimes I think that the PC crowd is more into this for the attention than to actually promote positive TV/Music/Movie for the next generation.
1) In one scene, Pinochio is seen wearing a thong
2) The Bartender *The Ugly Step Sister* (Voice by Larry King) in "The Poison Apple" is obviously a pre-op transexual.
3) Sexual innuendo
4) Racial tollerence themes (Ogres aren't being accepted as 'equal')
5) The overuse of Majik - which goes against the Bible
rebuttal
1) Wearing women's clothing (if you're a guy) is a fetish ... and is related to transvestism ... but often NOT related to homosexuality at all. This was a sight-gag, was funny as hell.
2) It's the Ugly step-sister - she's pretty ugly in the movie... a bit of a stretch (Larry King does a great job BTW)
3) Well...they ARE newly married, eh
4) Yup...good idea too
5) Hunh? Majik has been used in every fairy tale for eons...and they're complaining now? Time for a good ol' fashined book-burning. We'll start with Grim's Fairytales, go onto Mother Goose etc...
Sometimes I think that the PC crowd is more into this for the attention than to actually promote positive TV/Music/Movie for the next generation.
ClaireBear
Banned
Gonz said:
Hey Gonz... go on and get!... Don't you have typos and spelling mistakes to rectify!?
Lopan
New Member
Gonz said:
Indeed would'nt want them living in a world of nutters, hell bent on the destruction of man kind.
Although I would like to be around when the world ends and the second coming doesn't happen, just to see the expressions on all those fundamentalists faces.
I've been expecting you 
ClaireBear said:
They should be denied a license to marry.
CB said:The only thing thats stopping gay marriage becoming legal is the Church... but seriously... how many straight couples today take their vows religiously or even seriously as the divorce rates prove?!
I didn't marry in a church. We were bonded in a civil ceremony. Our vows were taken very very strongly. Divorce should be limited to 3 options...Adultery, Abuse & Addiction.
Lopan said:Indeed would'nt want them living in a world of nutters, hell bent on the destruction of man kind.
Although I would like to be around when the world ends and the second coming doesn't happen, just to see the expressions on all those fundamentalists faces.
Are you incorrectly assuming I'm religious?
ClaireBear
Banned
Gonz said:
Yes... I totally agree...
The point concerning Gay marriage... other than "just because!?"
He wasn't married to another homoseual was he? I don't care what people do in their bedroom, which is the seperation between homo- & hetero-.
The actual irony is, the homosexual agenda is so looking to get accepted they've made some of history's greatest figures homosexual...at a time the figure is no longer able to answer for themself.
The actual irony is, the homosexual agenda is so looking to get accepted they've made some of history's greatest figures homosexual...at a time the figure is no longer able to answer for themself.
Professur
Well-Known Member
ClaireBear said:
No. My point is that I'm not against gay anything. I'm against the redefinition of marriage.
And that is exactly the sort of thing I'm against. And it's all gay marriage adds up to.
The only thing thats stopping gay marriage becoming legal is the Church... but seriously... how many straight couples today take their vows religiously or even seriously as the divorce rates prove?!
No. What's stopping gay legal marriages is politics. The divorce rate is again, something that's not going to improve with gay marriage. If it's not taken seriously now, what'll it be like once gays get into it?
Why get all angsty over it?... I readily admit I'm a product of a PC upbringing and have very pro views concerning gender, race and sexuality but I really don't see that as a bad thing...
Angsty? I'm against it because, unlike most people today, I know what marriage is really about. I know what it's really for. It's a binding of two people, into something greater. Most people today can't see beyond themselves. And that's why marriages fail. Gay marriage is simply going to destroy the precious little that's left.
My piece is said. I'm out. If my point isn't made by now, then you simply don't have the capacity to understand the underlying concepts I'm trying to get across.