Study links genes, male homosexuality
- Thread starter MrBishop
- Start date
A.B.Normal
New Member
If your studying male jeans{especially if they are being worn} you most certainly are gay . 
MrBishop
Well-Known Member
Gato_Solo said:I posted something along those lines months ago. Old news, dude...
That's when I asked about 'curing' (notice the quotes) homosexuality with gene therapy. I'm sure you responded in there somewhere...
C'est la vie...I just renoticed it. Ignore it if you will.
BeardofPants
New Member
A.B.Normal said:If your studying male jeans{especially if they are being worn} you most certainly are gay .
Wait.... what does that make me?
*wonders if she can be bothered copying & pasting from PiL.
MrBishop
Well-Known Member
Gato_Solo said:
It's a catch 22 frankly. If it's a natural phenomenon which does not cause the death of the individual, nor affect his health..nor is it 'catching'... why treat it? Why should people be forced to change an integral part of themselves, their personality and their lifestyle to suit the morals of some rather vocal people? If it ain't broke..why force people to fix it?
Gato_Solo
Out-freaking-standing OTC member
MrBishop said:
Where's when you need him?
Because, if it's 'curable', and the 'cure' is refused, it can be called anti-social behavior. By choosing to be 'outside' of mainstream society, they would make themselves pariahs, and, even worse, subject to public humiliation, scorn, and even illegal physical harm. Why would anyone 'willingly' subject themselves to such a life?
Ok, is being Black a gene thing? Is there a cure?Gato_Solo said:Where's when you need him?
Because, if it's 'curable', and the 'cure' is refused, it can be called anti-social behavior. By choosing to be 'outside' of mainstream society, they would make themselves pariahs, and, even worse, subject to public humiliation, scorn, and even illegal physical harm. Why would anyone 'willingly' subject themselves to such a life?
MrBishop
Well-Known Member
Gato_Solo said:Where's when you need him?
Because, if it's 'curable', and the 'cure' is refused, it can be called anti-social behavior. By choosing to be 'outside' of mainstream society, they would make themselves pariahs, and, even worse, subject to public humiliation, scorn, and even illegal physical harm. Why would anyone 'willingly' subject themselves to such a life?
I'd rather hear that something is 'changeable' rather than 'cureable'. Cureable denotes a disease.
So...if homosexuality can be changed into heterosexuality, but certain homsexuals refuse to go through this change..what are they?
Gato_Solo
Out-freaking-standing OTC member
PuterTutor said:
That's why I put it in quotes. As for how we went over it before, I'll explain once again.
1. Fact. Earliest complete human skeleton found in Africa. African's adapted to their climate with dark skin.
2. Extrapolation. If the earliest men came from Africa, and the genetics of the world's population bears this out, then all other races are genetic off-shoots of the original, African, gene pool. Since you are not African, that means you are a mutation, hence it is you that should be cured.
Clear? On the same page? Good.
Back on topic...
Since being homosexual is looked upon by society-in-general (all societies have taboos against homosexuality in one form or another), and homosexuality does nothing to perpetuate the species, then homosexuality can be looked upon as an undesirable trait. If a trait is undesirable, and can be corrected, and the recipient of said 'cure' refuses treatment, then what do you call that person? How do you treat that person?