Study links genes, male homosexuality

So yous sayin' we's all started out black and have been de-evolving ever since?

I guess DEVO was right, lol
I suppose homosexuality is a step in the right direction.

Y's was the Nubians always portrayed as savages and slaves throughout history????????????
 
Winky said:
Y's was the Nubians always portrayed as savages and slaves throughout history????????????
Because the winners of any war get to write the history...the way they saw it.
 
It is good to the winnah and still champ-peon.

Yeah if the Arabs win this war on terror
we will have to re-write all the history books?
 
Winky said:
It is good to the winnah and still champ-peon.

Yeah if the Arabs win this war on terror
we will have to re-write all the history books?

Actually, the Arabs, at one time, were in control of most of Eastern Europe, and all of Spain and Portugal. During that time, the rest of Europe was still in the dark ages, fucking goats. In fact, that's when Europe was at it's most peaceful period. As for being 'winner', what have you, personally, won? So far, you've acted as though you've received some benefit just by being caucasian, but I'll clue you in on something...If you ain't rich, you ain't shit. Hate to sound like that, but that's the way the world works. Race, religion, and political parties were invented, or changed, to keep the rich rich, and get the poor to fight for the crumbs that fall from their table. Which crumb are you fighting for? ;)

Back on topic...

Bish, you never answered the question. It's okay if you don't, but it doesn't make for a good debate...;)
 
Gato_Solo said:
Actually, the Arabs, at one time, were in control of most of Eastern Europe, and all of Spain and Portugal. During that time, the rest of Europe was still in the dark ages, fucking goats. In fact, that's when Europe was at it's most peaceful period. As for being 'winner', what have you, personally, won? So far, you've acted as though you've received some benefit just by being caucasian, but I'll clue you in on something...If you ain't rich, you ain't shit. Hate to sound like that, but that's the way the world works. Race, religion, and political parties were invented, or changed, to keep the rich rich, and get the poor to fight for the crumbs that fall from their table. Which crumb are you fighting for? ;)

Substantially correct, although I would have said goats and sheep. ;)

Why do so many westerners have so much trouble understanding that civilization began in the middle east?
Note that it spread eastward first too.
 
Winky said:
It is good to the winnah and still champ-peon.

Yeah if the Arabs win this war on terror
we will have to re-write all the history books?

IF the Arabs win the war on terror...we'll still be around. You seem to have an issue seperating Muslims and terrorists... here's a clue. We're at war with one but not the other.

Winners tend to destroy old history books eventually...or rewrite it to reflect better on them.
 
Some of you are really silly bastards

so what happened 1000 years ago
make a whit of difference against the last 400
years of your-a-peon rule lol

Yep it's best to be white whether your in America OR Africa
dang it's better to be white anywhere.

What was that line by that black comedian about
switching places with a rich black guy?

guess we don't get to pick our color parents or anything like that tho...
All we can do is not be pissed off because we were born of color ;)

re-write that history all ya want bud.

http://www.otcentral.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7227
 
MrBishop said:
IF the Arabs win the war on terror...we'll still be around. You seem to have an issue seperating Muslims and terrorists... here's a clue. We're at war with one but not the other.

Winners tend to destroy old history books eventually...or rewrite it to reflect better on them.


Dang Bish you normally devote more brainpower to your posting.

Firstly the 'rabs ain't got a chance in Hell of winning anything
I was kiddin' Secondly Moslems and 'rabs what's the point in
splittin hares? You can lump all them primitive third worlders in together

History is history
black is black
and
white is white
History can not be re-written only lied about.
 
Winky said:

Tell you what...here's a test that you can perform yourself. Go into any christian church...take a good long look at the crucifix. What colour is the guy nailed up there?

Now...historically speaking...what colour was he really? Jewish guy of Middle-Easter Descent...hmmm...

He damned well wasn't a pale skinned, blue eyed european-looking dude. Wonder why that might be?

Can you say...rewriten history?
 
Winky said:
Dang Bish you normally devote more brainpower to your posting.

Firstly the 'rabs ain't got a chance in Hell of winning anything
I was kiddin' Secondly Moslems and 'rabs what's the point in
splittin hares? You can lump all them primitive third worlders in together

History is history
black is black
and
white is white
History can not be re-written only lied about.

You know...I could've sworn that you were 38 or something. You're writing like an illiterate pimply-faced 15 year old net-monkey.

I'm not splitting Hairs... Not all Arabs are Muslim and not all muslims are Arabic. The difference that I was trying to get accross was that we're at war with terrorists...not Arabs OR Muslims. Certainly not Arabians...they're our 'allies'.

History changes...history books get rewritten and reinterpreted all the time. This isn't to mean that what actually happened has changed...but how we feel about it and how we interpret it has changed.

Another example. Columbus came to America, invaded it, slaughtered millions of natives, locked thousands up in jails, and eventually 'reservations'. He brought war, pestilence, famine and death to hundreds of thousands, looted villages, raped women and children and brainwashed others into changing their names, their religion and turning their backs on their own people.

or

Columbus discovered America.

Which one did you read about in history books?
 
MrBishop said:
You know...I could've sworn that you were 38 or something. You're writing like an illiterate pimply-faced 15 year old net-monkey.

I'm not splitting Hairs... Not all Arabs are Muslim and not all muslims are Arabic. The difference that I was trying to get accross was that we're at war with terrorists...not Arabs OR Muslims. Certainly not Arabians...they're our 'allies'.

History changes...history books get rewritten and reinterpreted all the time. This isn't to mean that what actually happened has changed...but how we feel about it and how we interpret it has changed.

Another example. Columbus came to America, invaded it, slaughtered millions of natives, locked thousands up in jails, and eventually 'reservations'. He brought war, pestilence, famine and death to hundreds of thousands, looted villages, raped women and children and brainwashed others into changing their names, their religion and turning their backs on their own people.

or

Columbus discovered America.

Which one did you read about in history books?

Don't bother, MrBish. If he didn't get the obvious sarcasm in my posts to PT, then how is he going to get yours? ;)
 
a bit more evidence to add to the growing pile?

December 05, 2004
Slimming pills increase chance of lesbian child
- by Katie Samuel


TAKING pills for slimming and thyroid problems during pregnancy may increase the possibility of bearing lesbian daughters, a study has revealed.
Researchers studied thousands of pregnant women to study the effect of prescription drugs on their babies and discovered that the drug thyroxine, used to treat thyroid deficiency, and amphetamine-based slimming pills appear to influence homosexuality among female children.


The results show sexual orientation is affected by prenatal rather than social factors, with mothers of homosexual girls proving eight times more likely to have taken those pills — most noticeably with daughters whose mothers took them during their first three months of pregnancy.

Professor Lee Ellis and his team at Minot State University, North Dakota, compiled the study using the mothers of more than 5,000 students. They discovered thyroid pills were taken by 5.2% of the mothers of lesbians but by only 1% of mothers of female heterosexuals. Slimming pills were taken by 2% of mothers of lesbians but only 0.2% of mothers of heterosexual children. The findings will appear in the journal Personality and Individual Differences, next month.

They also discovered that women who suffered prenatal stress were more likely to have a male homosexual child.

The report concludes: “The most noteworthy findings were that if prenatal therapeutic substances affect offspring sexual orientation, the effects are mainly confined to female offspring and are limited to the first trimester of pregnancy.

“In particular, mothers of the female homosexuals in our sample were significantly more likely than mothers of female heterosexuals to have taken diet pills and thyroid medications during pregnancy.”

It also revealed that some drugs can have the opposite effect — mothers of heterosexual males were 70% more likely to have taken pills to combat nausea than those of gay men.

Ellis said: “This was the first study in that area — looking at the effect of prescribed drugs — we found no evidence of male homosexuality but it did tie up to lesbianism. We were interested in prenatal stress but thought we should look at other prenatal factors and this was not what we expected to find but it was very clear.”

He added that the numbers taking the drugs were small and a larger study should be undertaken.

He said: “It took us a long time to do so I hope someone else can take it further and recompile the data.”

Professor Jim Dornan, vice-president of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, called it an “very interesting finding which definitely deserves further study”.

source

I guess this explains why the moms of most lesbians are skinnier then most?
 
Thulsa Doom said:
a bit more evidence to add to the growing pile?



source

I guess this explains why the moms of most lesbians are skinnier then most?

So now it's a drug side-effect? Who knew? :lol2: :rofl4:

So, TD, what do you think we should do? :rofl2:
 
Drug side-effect or genetic anomoly...it's still proof towards the 'homosexuality is not a choice' side of the argument.
 
MrBishop said:
Drug side-effect or genetic anomoly...it's still proof towards the 'homosexuality is not a choice' side of the argument.


It also means that, once the drugs are out of the system, it's a choice. Perhaps based on habit, but still a choice. ;)
 
Release all the murderers and rapists from prison
they weren’t responsible it was their genetics.

No one is responsible for their actions.
The liberals were right all along!
 
Gato_Solo said:
It also means that, once the drugs are out of the system, it's a choice. Perhaps based on habit, but still a choice. ;)
Uhm, the drug in question is something the mothers took while being pregnant. No "getting it out of the system" there. If the test is correct (I don't assume that it is), then it indicates that something is altered in the foetus (from the exposure to said hormone and whatever was in the slimming pills), causing it to become a gay individual.
 
Winky said:
Release all the murderers and rapists from prison
they weren’t responsible it was their genetics.

No one is responsible for their actions.
The liberals were right all along!
Comparing being gay to rape and murder? :alienhuh:
 
Starya said:
Uhm, the drug in question is something the mothers took while being pregnant. No "getting it out of the system" there. If the test is correct (I don't assume that it is), then it indicates that something is altered in the foetus (from the exposure to said hormone and whatever was in the slimming pills), causing it to become a gay individual.

Which, in turn, means a foreign body permeated the placenta...I'm not buying it, either. Diet pills are not that big a deal...unless they contain high amounts of amphetamines. And then the results are also well documented, and nowhere does it mention homosexuality...until now. Go figure. :shrug:
 
Back
Top