unclehobart
New Member
Indeed... but the sheer cost of slapping something on top of a mountain and maintaining it would be mighty pricey. I think wind power shies away from areas prone to snow and ice because it gums up the works.
Winky said:When you ponder power consider this...
other than perhaps geo-thermal it all
comes from the Sun. Even nuclear
fuel was formed within a star!
The only salavtion is fusion.
Perhaps 200 years from now.Gato_Solo said:Dyson sphere, anyone?
unclehobart said:Perhaps 200 years from now.
A Dyson sphere in the solar system, with a radius of one AU would have a surface area of at least 2.72e17 km^2, around 600 million times the surface area of the Earth. The sun has a energy output of around 4e26 W, of which most would be available to do useful work.
Gonz said:I knew the term but was unsure of exactly what a Dyson Sphere was. Googled it. After updating my memory banks I also found out that we may havve to wait for another planet to fail before "building" one.
Gato_Solo said:Dyson sphere, anyone?
chcr said:Familiar with the poor man's Dyson Sphere aka Ringworld ? A book by Larry Niven. Much less resource intensive and more cost effective than a Dyson Sphere. I'd say there's more than enough junk in the solar system to build either/or. It's that pesky cheap transmutation process that's gotta be overcome.
With all the other irons he has in the fire, it's probably a drop in the bucket.Gato_Solo said:True, but a ringworld requires attitude jets. Ringworld also features prominently in Halo...I wonder what Microsoft is paying in royalties for that idea...
unclehobart said:There has to be a mini ringworld concept that can be built with the materials we can find here and the moon. Something thats very good at the whole solar collection and redirection thing.
The trouble I have with a full bore ringworld is the 100,000x increase in collisions with space trash and comets.
I dare say we would have to chill out and cooperate as a global population to make such a thing viable.