The 9/11 Conspiracy At The Pentagon
- Thread starter Gotholic
- Start date
Winky
Well-Known Member
on 9-11 I recall seeing pictures
of the damaged light poles the aircraft
clipped on its way in
the savage murderer that flew that plane
did a hellava job though
it wasn't an easy approach
yeah I'm certain all these people are in on the hoax as well...
Eyewitness Accounts
of the damaged light poles the aircraft
clipped on its way in
the savage murderer that flew that plane
did a hellava job though
it wasn't an easy approach
yeah I'm certain all these people are in on the hoax as well...
Eyewitness Accounts
ekahs retsam
New Member
Gato_Solo said:
that is interesting because i distinctly remember several reporters interviewing people shortly after who claimed they saw a missile not a plane. (i'll try and find some of those)
The reason i remember this is because i was a Western Civ class at the time and we discussed who and how someone could hit it with a missile.
Could this whole thing including other attacks have been planned internally, YES. Why would someone want this to happen? The answer is very easy to understand. Many people have made lots of money off this war.
Is it likely that something like this could be covered up and stay buried.... NO
For instance just look at what is happening with the CIA right now. They are leaking like a boat about to go under.
But then again people seem to dismiss alternative theories right off hand, but that is just human nature.
Gato_Solo
Out-freaking-standing OTC member
ekahs retsam said:
Still waiting...
er said:
A missile of that type would have to be fired from quite some distance away, and would have been spotted by more than a few people. The Pentagon is on a heavily travelled route...
er said:
Not as much as you'd like to believe, but there was more money being made by more people before the war. Try as you like, but Katrina put more cash in big oil's pockets than the four years we've been fighting in Iraq...which is what most clueless people claim the war was about...
er said:
Hmmm...nice opinion, but two scandals does not a sinking boat make.
er said:
If it was plausible, it would have more attention. Unfortunately, the whole alternative theory posted on the site is nothing more than the insane ramblings of a rampant paranoid mind hell-bent on discrediting the US government in general, and the US President in particular.
F
flav
Guest
Apparently somebody didn't want me to respond to Unc's BS with my usual screenname.....
...after 5 commentaries were made.
It was a prediction that most people would dismiss the topic without putting much thought into it or seriously condidering evidence. Sweeping insult is a bit overstated.
...the prediction was based things said in this thread in 5 commentaries and the level of interest in another thread on the same subject. What a crazy idea.
An "unprovoked" prediction? How exactly are you "calling me out"? Calling out means to challenge someone in some way. All you've done is misread my comments, make assumptions yourself, and start unprovoked personal attacks.
That's not so much a challenge...more of an indication there's a prescription somewhere you need to get refilled.
Here's a a few challenges...
1. Read the following sentence and write down any parts that would indicate a "warped adult mind"...
Find any differences with the word in each quote immediately following "this".
2.b If there was a difference in part "a" replace the word in the 2nd quote with the word in the 1st quote. What effect does this have on the 2nd quote?
3. Read the first three comments in this thread and the response to the recent thread Luis started on the WTC. Use them to make arguments for and against the following predictions...
4. Find unprovoked examples supporting the following statement...
No, it was designed to promote discussion on the topic with the intent that after reading my comment people would try to prove me wrong and actually discuss the subject. I find this topic interesting and there wasn't much response to the thread Luis started.
unclehobart said:
...after 5 commentaries were made.
It was a prediction that most people would dismiss the topic without putting much thought into it or seriously condidering evidence. Sweeping insult is a bit overstated.
...the prediction was based things said in this thread in 5 commentaries and the level of interest in another thread on the same subject. What a crazy idea.
An "unprovoked" prediction? How exactly are you "calling me out"? Calling out means to challenge someone in some way. All you've done is misread my comments, make assumptions yourself, and start unprovoked personal attacks.
That's not so much a challenge...more of an indication there's a prescription somewhere you need to get refilled.
Here's a a few challenges...
1. Read the following sentence and write down any parts that would indicate a "warped adult mind"...
- I think most here will dismiss any evidence without even thinking about it. I doubt seriously you'll get any intelligent replies."
- "I don't think this subject is going to get many thought out replies"
- "You keep claiming 'this thread, this thread' while trying to invoke past threads. You can't have it both ways"
Find any differences with the word in each quote immediately following "this".
2.b If there was a difference in part "a" replace the word in the 2nd quote with the word in the 1st quote. What effect does this have on the 2nd quote?
3. Read the first three comments in this thread and the response to the recent thread Luis started on the WTC. Use them to make arguments for and against the following predictions...
- Most will dismiss any evidence without even thinking about it.
- There will be many intelligent replies.
4. Find unprovoked examples supporting the following statement...
- "You were an asshole in the other threads, so we should expect little from you here as well"
No, it was designed to promote discussion on the topic with the intent that after reading my comment people would try to prove me wrong and actually discuss the subject. I find this topic interesting and there wasn't much response to the thread Luis started.
F
flav
Guest
Going better than yours it appears.
F
flav
Guest
Who's TG and what happened?
The ones that try and gang up are just a bunch of yellow gutless mice and a couple biased inept moderators. Screw 'em.
The ones that try and gang up are just a bunch of yellow gutless mice and a couple biased inept moderators. Screw 'em.
F
flav
Guest
HomeLAN said:
A mod who can't see all the posts is a good example of "bias" and "inept" that I referred to earlier. Thanks for proving the point.
Unc seems to be taking care of the "yellow gutless mice" part. "Calling me out" ....yeah right. Call me out and run away?
Inakara said:
You're talking about syntax not semantics with your example...which doesn't change the meaning of the sentence. Unc's mistake invalidated his attempt at a point.
F
flav
Guest
Never happened before.
Why? A lot of people still enjoying kickin' your ass?
I could see that just never getting old for some people you may not be very good at readin' and writin', forming insults, or making a point but I bet you're a wiz at keeping those ass-kickins fun and fresh.
Why? A lot of people still enjoying kickin' your ass?
I could see that just never getting old for some people you may not be very good at readin' and writin', forming insults, or making a point but I bet you're a wiz at keeping those ass-kickins fun and fresh.