MrBishop
Well-Known Member
We've all talked about the legality of the Guantanamo bay prisoners and their rights to lawyers, courts, trials etc... but precious little has been talked about this as a potentially viral prescendent.
I'll toss the ball out...let's see who comes up to bat.
Now...the reason why these people are there is because they pose a serious threat to the United States and the world at large because of their involvement with terrorist groups or their supporting governments. Protect the nation by removing the combattants from play...permanently.
Now... in order to protect the nation from those that would overthrow the gvt, or plot terrorist acts on American soil, the president would be (by the writing on this writ) to remove anyone to Guantanamo Bay providing that s/he felt that this person posed an imminent threat to the USA.
There's no need for proof...because lawyers aren't involved, or courts for that matter. It'd be just a matter of someone dissapearing from American soil and reappearing on American soil...only this time, in Cuba.
Now....the slippery slope. What about members of political groups that go against the president? Might they not as easily be labeled political prisoners and shipped off? What about leaders of radical groups who aren't 'Christian enough', or 'American enough' ?
Isn't this one hell of a premise for black lists and dissapearances?
I'll toss the ball out...let's see who comes up to bat.
The Bush administration asserts the right to hold and interrogate the men as long as necessary, without formal charges or the guarantee of a trial or access to a lawyer. The administration also asserts the men are not traditional prisoners of war, who would have guaranteed rights under the Geneva Convention
Now...the reason why these people are there is because they pose a serious threat to the United States and the world at large because of their involvement with terrorist groups or their supporting governments. Protect the nation by removing the combattants from play...permanently.
Now... in order to protect the nation from those that would overthrow the gvt, or plot terrorist acts on American soil, the president would be (by the writing on this writ) to remove anyone to Guantanamo Bay providing that s/he felt that this person posed an imminent threat to the USA.
There's no need for proof...because lawyers aren't involved, or courts for that matter. It'd be just a matter of someone dissapearing from American soil and reappearing on American soil...only this time, in Cuba.
Now....the slippery slope. What about members of political groups that go against the president? Might they not as easily be labeled political prisoners and shipped off? What about leaders of radical groups who aren't 'Christian enough', or 'American enough' ?
Isn't this one hell of a premise for black lists and dissapearances?