Welcome to the Brave New World

[tonksy]

You'll notice his post is editted too?

 

[spike]

Oh, there were still insults in both so I didn't even notice the edits.

Fair enough.

 

[tonksy]

Implied insults are one thing, name calling makes me feel all obligated and shit to do my however vaguely valued job as moderator.

 

[jimpeel]

Implied insults are one thing, name calling makes me feel all obligated and shit to do my however vaguely valued job as moderator.

[waving arms frantically]Oo! Oo! Oo! Let me! Let me! I wanna do it![/waving arms frantically]

 

[tonksy]

Riiiiight.

 

[jimpeel]

If you hype it, they will panic.

Remember THIS THREAD? Has the rhetoric subsided even a single decibel?

 

[ClarabellaUK]

Aaaaaah! Memories...

Now THIS is OTC!

*warm fuzzy nostalgic feeling*

 

[A.B.Normal]

Implied insults are one thing, name calling makes me feel all obligated and shit to do my however vaguely valued job as moderator.

Oh ..man... now your making me feel guilty about not reading absolutely every freakin' post in the RW.

 

[MrBishop]

Implied insults are one thing, name calling makes me feel all obligated and shit to do my however vaguely valued job as moderator.

We luf you, Tonks!

 

[tonksy]

Oh ..man... now your making me feel guilty about not reading absolutely every freakin' post in the RW.

Please Dear, I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy if I had one. We catch what we catch...kinda why they got that report feature, eh?

We luf you, Tonks!

Aaaaaw

 

[Gonz]

Hard to tell isn't it?

Not a one. Sorry, Next.

 

[jimpeel]

Riiiiight.

Aw, shit. I thought you were gonna boot him in the ass.

 

[2minkey]

Aw, shit. I thought you were gonna boot him in the ass.

bet you were hoping the webcam would be on, too...

 

[spike]

Riiiiight.

No shit. Jimbo as a moderator?

 

[spike]

Not a one. Sorry, Next.

It's crazy how often you are factually incorrect. It's as if you don't check anything and just rely completely on wishful thinking.

U.S. Can Confine Citizens Without Charges, Court Rules

By Jerry Markon
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, September 10, 2005; Page A01

A federal appeals court yesterday backed the president's power to indefinitely detain a U.S. citizen captured on U.S. soil without any criminal charges, holding that such authority is vital during wartime to protect the nation from terrorist attacks.

The ruling, by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, came in the case of Jose Padilla, a former gang member and U.S. citizen arrested in Chicago in 2002 and a month later designated an "enemy combatant" by President Bush. The government contends that Padilla trained at al Qaeda camps and was planning to blow up apartment buildings in the United States. Padilla has been held without trial in a U.S. naval brig for more than three years

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/09/AR2005090900772.html

 

[Professur]

Why not? We've had worse. Much, much worse.

 

[jimpeel]

bet you were hoping the webcam would be on, too...

Yeah, woulda been hilarious seeing me hopping around on one foot with the other one buried ... well, you get the picture.

 

[Gonz]

Where is Jose Padilla?

for posterity

I see you supporting the ability to imprison US citizens indefinitely without charges and then bitching about your liberty.

 

[jimpeel]

Where is Jose Padilla?

for posterity

You mean this guy?

 

[spike]

Yeah, woulda been hilarious seeing me hopping around on one foot with the other one buried ... well, you get the picture.

The cam would have shown you hopping around blubbering and crying if you tried to stick any part of your body in Gonz or I.

Yes, it would be hilarious.