Once again, the predictable knee-jerk reaction from the self-absorbed hoity-toity
librul.
Not sure how you came to that conclusion from my post as I said absolutely nothing re: "bring back the Jim Crow laws".
Apparently, you don't know the definition of "Jim Crow laws".
I suggested that the people who haven't a clue about how our system works and have absolutely no interest in it other than wanting to vote for "history" aren’t the ones who should be driving our politics.
You don't have to look any further than the Obots who publicly stated that they were supporting Obozo because he would
pay their bills, or
get them a better job, or
provide them with housing as an example. They are the ignorant, uninformed voters who were swept up into the Celebrity Cult of Personality, motivated by their own self-interests, who handed this country over to socialists, and they overwhelmed the numbers who had gone to the trouble of educating themselves about candidates and issues.
In the U.S. the purpose of voting is to select people with the competence and integrity to direct the functioning of government as dictated by our Constitution, not to choose the candidate whose name and packaging is most appealing. For there to be any benefit to the country the election process requires that the choices be made on a reasoned basis. Name a benefit that has resulted from 0bama. "Change" doesn't qualify as a benefit.
I'm merely suggesting that some knowledge and some interest in public affairs should be demonstrated before a person gets their voter-registration card.
What a cross to bear! LOL!
