Canada 'can permit gay marriage'

Winky said:
You aren't serious
no wait its FreakOh
silly me...

Yup The Canucks are such copy Kats just
what 35 years behind the times?
Judicial activism is like so 60's man.
But I dunno they are weird enough up there if it was put to a proper vote
who knows it might pass. I guess on those long artic winter nights ol' Steve starts to look mighty fine!
Click to expand...



you misspelled my s/n. there is no H in it. and Roe V Wade is in the Constitution from the last I heard.
 
PostCode said:
If you respected my beliefs like you say you do, then you wouldn't be bashing it like a Christian was a disease.

The truth of the Bible is quite plain and quite simple. Either you belief in it or you don't. I never said YOU had to believe in it did I? No. Stop trying to make it sound like I'm the one shoving my beliefs down your throat. I'm telling you my beliefs. If you don't accept them that's fine. I'm not telling you I discriminate against homosexuality nor do I believe that my view has some overriding superiority over yours.

I never said I hated homosexuals. I have a few friends who are homosexual. Now, you tell me. Does me having a friend who is homosexual make me a Bible thumping, shove it down your throat, my way or hell, Christian? No. I respect one's beliefs. I'm not a Catholic, a Lutheran, a Methodist, or even a Jehovah's Witness. I'm a Christian. I believe in the Bible.

It's misguided because people make their own assumptions about what the Bible says, thus the variations of denominations. It's not propaganda, it's the truth. You don't believe it's the truth, fine. I believe it is. Well, as for the Bible being written by men, yes. But, the words of the Bible were God inspired. Of course, you’re not going to believe that. I respect that. You’re not going to believe in God so you’re not going to believe that God inspired the Bible. You’re also not going to believe in the Devil either. I do.

Open perspective? If I start changing my mind on issues that the very Bible believes in what does that make me? A hypocrite. No, I refuse to believe that by accepting homosexuality will make me a better person by "going with the flow". The Bible tells me that people will persecute us, that is, the believers, like this. That's fine with me.

Just like you say my beliefs cause me ignorance, your own believes have caused you ignorance. Ignorance of the truth. The truth itself is not supposed to be easy. It's supposed to be hard because we go against it everyday. There you go again, bashing my beliefs. Get off your conception of God and Jesus being this "so-called conception".

Homosexuality is not determined by birth. It's personal choice. A person can say they are homosexual yet abstain from it. It's when they don't that they have broken the word of God. I never said there was a "pill" to make you "straight" now did I?

Again, you’re bashing beliefs here with this "gay-o-meter" bullshit. You say you respect it, yet you continue to bash it. I may very well get banned for this but I don't care.

You're post is seething in hypocrisy. You're a hypocrite by saying you respect something but then you turn right around and bash it.


On a side note, my wife's unit got put on alert this morning. Will hopfully find out more on Monday after a big meating that the senior commanders will be having.
Click to expand...


Easy there, CDAT...I already responded to her...and with a bit more diplomacy than you. ;)

BTW...If she can request Ali Al Salem, she should. ;)
 
freako104 said:
Roe V Wade is in the Constitution from the last I heard
Click to expand...

Damn dood you are a source of continual entertainemnt.

Oh and there's no 'ster' in Inkster either Freak-Oh! lol
 
"Homosexuality is not determined by birth. It's personal choice.
A person can say they are homosexual yet abstain from it."

Truer words are seldom spoken.

Just as alcoholism, pedophilia and being a murderer are not determined at birth.
See what the liberal side has attempted to do?
Race IS determined at birth.
Race doesn't mean that a person is more likely to be an alcoholic child raping murderer,
but by getting people to ‘buy the lie’ you can now transfer racial discrimination against
'minorities' to behaviors.

Man If I was a member of a 'minority' group I'd be against this falsehood.
No wait I am a minority I'm white lol
(a proud menber of the one sixth of the worlds population)
 
SouthernN'Proud said:
Hell, I'm all for it. While yer at it, and since you already got all the Steve-n-Stewarts or Nancy-n-Nicoles up there, do us ignorant intolerant Americans a favor and naturalize 'em too. Just keep 'em. We don't want 'em. That way I don't have to explain why that man is kissing that other man to my kids. The word "gay" can once again be equated with the word "festive" instead of "abnormality". Won't that be nice?
Click to expand...

Hey now! I don't even know anyone name Nancy! And am damn sure that if I did I wouldn't wanna marry her :lloyd:
 
no but you still misspselled my s/n. At least spell it correctly. thats all I am saying, It is hard to take you seriously when you dont.
 
Leslie said:
I know a Nancy and I wouldn't marry her.

Perhaps a Sabrina...
Click to expand...

But you see...Leslie and Sabrina just doesn't have the Nicole and Nancy ring to it...if all Nicoles have to marry Nancies I'ma gonna have to change my name :lloyd:
 
freako104 said:
you misspelled my s/n. there is no H in it. and Roe V Wade is in the Constitution from the last I heard.
Click to expand...

Umm, no. That would be a Supreme Court decision, not a constitutional amendment, freako. That's probably why Winky is laughing at you so damn hard.
 
Thar's no "Oh" in freako104 but
through exhaustive research I 'finally'
found the part in the Constitution where it clearly sez:
Every Woman shall have the right to murder her unborn child.
and this right shall not be usurped!

Whew, that's a load offa my Mind
 
Oh, since most of you probably haven't read the article, I'll just point out. The canadian gov't may permit gay marriage. Not must. Wether or not they will is still up to a house of commons vote. And several Liberal ministers, including one cabinet minister have stated publicly that they're not voting for this. The cabinet minister admitted that his vote in this will certainly cost him his cabinet post, but he's still voting against it.
 
Winky said:
You aren't serious
no wait its FreakOh
silly me...

Yup The Canucks are such copy Kats just
what 35 years behind the times?
Judicial activism is like so 60's man.
But I dunno they are weird enough up there if it was put to a proper vote
who knows it might pass. I guess on those long artic winter nights ol' Steve starts to look mighty fine!
Click to expand...


Of yesh! we's Canucks be so fars backwards up in the ARCTIC next to you yanks, eh.

Now you must excuse me. I have to go hop on my dog sled for a 5 hour ride to the nearest corner store so I can buy some raw fish and a match so I don't freeze to death. You know.. I haven't had any fish in days, and it gets cold in the "artic".

:nono: :nono: :nono: :nono:





:D
 
I'da thought yous guys in the R Tic
woulda gots snowmobiles by now?

Lez be Lezbo what's the diff?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top