It's Palin ...

Status
Not open for further replies.
good point. but i'll she uses one of the horsey-type ones. less drool. and more appropriate, with the livestock reference and all.
 
MrBishop said:
"You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called 'change,' but it's still gonna stink after eight years."

Sounds more like he's talking about Bush - ya know. Eight Years in office. :shrug:
Click to expand...


I think he knows the Republicans are going to stay for another eight, and he was being ageist as well as sexist. :shrug:


McCain thinks that Palin's a pig too :rofl:
Click to expand...


In that quote from a year ago wasn't McCain using the idiom to describe what he thought was a dem bad idea: costly universal health-care proposals that require too much government regulation?

After had Palin spoken the word "lipstick" in the prior week with a different intent, yesterday Obama used it as a personal attack. :shrug:

The applauding crowd behind him knew who he was directing his comments at.


Is this Obama's idea of how to unite the American people?

He's going to start losing support with these personal attacks.

front091008.jpg


http://www.nypost.com/seven/09102008/news/nationalnews/holy_sow__bams_lipstick_bungle_128304.htm
 
Cerise said:
I think he knows the Republicans are going to stay for another eight, and he was being ageist as well as sexist. :shrug:
Click to expand...


oh no! ageist and sexist! boo hoo!

you're really starting to sound like a pussy liberal.

get tough! be a real american!
 
Cerise said:
I think he knows the Republicans are going to stay for another eight, and he was being ageist as well as sexist. :shrug:




In that quote from a year ago wasn't McCain using the idiom to describe what he thought was a dem bad idea: costly universal health-care proposals that require too much government regulation?

After had Palin spoken the word "lipstick" in the prior week with a different intent, yesterday Obama used it as a personal attack. :shrug:

The applauding crowd behind him knew who he was directing his comments at.


Is this Obama's idea of how to unite the American people?
Click to expand...
Yeah...and Obama was talking about McCain claiming that McCain taking over from Bush was a "Change".

Even your own link said so
Obama delivered the line while campaigning in Lebanon, Va., tearing into his rivals for not representing real change.
"You know, you can put lipstick on a pig," Obama said, "but it's still a pig."



He added, "You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called 'change.' It's still gonna stink after eight years."
Click to expand...
 
2minkey said:
oh no! ageist and sexist! boo hoo!

you're really starting to sound like a pussy liberal.

get tough! be a real american!
Click to expand...

Didn't Obama start this campaign saying he wasn't going to get into personal attacks? Just another flipflop.
 
First it's pigs and stinky fish, now it's a disabled man:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWe_ueiMC0Y

Democratic vice presidential candidate Joe Biden made an embarrassing remark during a campaign appearance in Columbia, Mo., on Tuesday.

Standing before a large gathering, Biden tried to give special recognition to State Senator Chuck Graham by shouting out to him: “Chuck, stand up, let the people see you.”

It was only then that Biden realized Graham is confined to a wheelchair. But he recovered quickly and told the crowd to “stand up for Chuck.” The crowd responded with a rousing cheer for Graham.
Click to expand...

Obama-Biden are the life of the party! :lol2:
 
Cerise said:
Didn't Obama start this campaign saying he wasn't going to get into personal attacks? Just another flipflop.
Click to expand...

Didn't the McCain camp say something similar...and yet the McCain camp is launching most of the personal attacks.

Do you have double standards for everything?
 
Did you know that Palin wants to charge rape victims for "rape kits" while in Illinois Obama sponsered a bill to ban that practice.
 
I love Rolling Stone sometimes :)
People are like so totally missing the real outrage point here.

Palin said she’s a pit bull with lipstick.

Obama said McCain’s “change” rhetoric was like putting lipstick on a pig.

By the irrefutable logic of the transitive property of lipstick, Obama was calling Palin a pig.


But it gets worse!


Obama also declared that Palin had a taste for… pork!!!

Following the McCain campaign’s logic to its inevitable conclusion, Obama was also calling piggy Palin a pork-thirsty cannibal.
God this guy is sick.
Click to expand...
http://www.rollingstone.com/nationa...top-the-presses-obama-calls-palin-a-cannibal/
 
So...I am thinking, isn't that a bit of a legal issue? I mean, if the police are going to use a rape kit to investigate the rape wouldn't it be a conflict of interest to have the victim pay for it?
 
ya think?
The community was trying to save "$5k-15k per year"

Kits are $1,200 each.

I'm thinking that the taxes paying $1200 to get one rapist off the streets is a fair price. 7,000 people in the town... hmmm. .17c/each To whom do I write the cheque?

http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-81914
 
spike said:
No you'll just spew entirely made up idiocy like the above. Palin's 3 scandals a day means that she is toast. American's aren't going to accept a couple morons like McCain-Palin.
Click to expand...

Only if, in your make-believe world, that those make-believe "scandals" are believed by anyone but you. They have all been thouroughly debunked; but you want to believe them so badly that you ignore the facts and march around beating the drum in the land of make-believe.
 
2minkey said:
well that's where you're wrong.

precedent? dubya got elected (as least by technicality) TWICE.

apparently america loves a parroting moron. and they will have that in spades with palin, who will serve brilliantly as vice president vagina/birth canal, which is what her hordes of male followers really like about her (as evidenced by all the "and she's hot" comments here and elsewhere). yes, she does look fertile, doesn't she?
:lol2:

well, at least mccain won't be taking the rapture into serious consideration when planning foreign policy. that's one notch up from bush.
Click to expand...


Yeah. Look at Jimmy Carter.
 
jimpeel said:
Only if, in your make-believe world, that those make-believe "scandals" are believed by anyone but you. They have all been thouroughly debunked;
Click to expand...

Actually she's under investigation Jim and cold hard facts have come out debunking many of her claims and her suspected affair has not been disproven and she's been caught lying.

So once again you have made up things and presented them as fact because you're so desperate to believe them.

And you spelled "thoroughly" wrong.
 
spike said:
Actually she's under investigation Jim and cold hard facts have come out debunking many of her claims
Click to expand...

Yes, they have come out on Liberal blogs and the investigation is still ongoing. Even if it is proven beyond even your wildest imagination that she had nopthing to do with this you will still declare her guilty.

and her suspected affair has not been disproven and she's been caught lying.
Click to expand...

I see. So her inability to disprove the negative is proof that the accusations are real. That is right up there with the old "So do you still beat your wife?" idiocy.

This from The Daily Shit Shovel
Dateline September 10, 2008

Spike had an affair with a gay porn queen and he was the one on the bottom munching carpet. The films are out there somewhere. They just haven't surfaced yet; but just because they haven't doesn't mean they won't.
Click to expand...

Now prove that that was false. Go ahead. Prove it. We'll wait.

So once again you have made up things and presented them as fact because you're so desperate to believe them.
Click to expand...

Made up? I'm just waiting foir you to declare her to be a space alien.

And you spelled "thoroughly" wrong.
Click to expand...

That's because I'm no typist.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top