Michael Jackson Court thread

Early prediction: (You heard it here first, folks!)

Guilty of lesser charges, a slap on the wrists, and a never ending media circus. Jury agreed to lesser charges because they didn't like being sequestered and wanted to go home, call their book agents, and get their slot on Maury booked early.
 
SouthernN'Proud said:
Early prediction: (You heard it here first, folks!)

Guilty of lesser charges, a slap on the wrists, and a never ending media circus. Jury agreed to lesser charges because they didn't like being sequestered and wanted to go home, call their book agents, and get their slot on Maury booked early.
Click to expand...

Yep.

Overall, I'd say the molesation charge has a chance but the conspiracy are no chance.
 
my prediction - not guilty legally...but still guilty enough for the families to sue the pants back on him
 
not guilty of conspiracy

not guilty of a lewd act on a minor child

not guilty same as abovce

not guilty same as above

not guilty same as above

noat guilty of attemptiing to commiit a lewd act on a child
ooze ot kids


not guilty of adminisrating and intoxicating agent

not guilty of giving booze ot kids

not guilty of admin intox agent

not guilty of booze to kids

not guilty of admin intox agent

not guilty of booze to kids

not guilty of adom intox agent

not guilty of booze to kids

NOT GUILTY ON ALL CHARGES

justice is dead
 
Just in case you aren't sure who the guy pictured on the Drudge Report is...

Santa Barbara County District Attorney Thomas Sneddon
Click to expand...

He'll most likely be the next LA County DA.
 
The difference between this one and the OJ case is the strength of the case. In the OJ case, the prosecution totally fucked up a strong case. Here, the prosecution totally fucked up a weaker case.

Mediocrity from public servants. I wish I could say that any of this surprised me, but it just doesn't.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top