You know, I could've gone the rest of my life not knowing about that freakin' link. DAMN my compulsion to click! Now I know better! I will never do that again!
And I could be considered a person who has seen a few things in my day.....but seriously----there's nothing visually attractive about the turgid male member in the hand or mouth or ass of another male. Especially, but not limited to, in public.
yeah but most girls don't like anal quite so much.
"it hurts too much."
"feels like pooping."
It's right up there with women's lit, and black studies .... but none of them are bigoted.
i do.
it's politicized "identity instruction"
you seem fixated on the sexual aspects of "gay."
LOL. but...
you seem fixated on the sexual aspects of "gay."
you're forgetting other essentials. this is an incomplete curriculum.
Those all could apply to heterosexuals as well. Seems like maybe Jim needs some classes of his own.
You gotta wonder why boys like it: it must be a power trip. That or some kind of elimination fixation.
Outside of sexual partners, the difference between homo & hetero is.....
Simply name one -- just one -- aspect of homosexuality, other than the sexual act of taking a man's penis in the mouth or anus, that makes a person a homosexual.
Then start a thread that is about heterosexuals and whether they are natural or nurtured, post about a for-credit class at the University of Michigan called "How to be Straight: Male Heterosexuality and Initiation.", and I will be happy to repost it there.
It all goes back to what I said about the heart and soul of the male sexuality, the prostate, being up there. Caught a bit of ribbing about that, I did. Doesn't make it any less true.
That would leave out women homosexuals kinda huh?
Um ... the class is for MEN. Maybe you missed that but most of us were able to figure that out just by reading the class title "How to be Gay: Male Homosexuality and Initiation."
I hate to belabor the point; but you really need to get that reading for comprehension thing down.
Being exclusively attracted to the same sex would qualify without the act.
I see. So it would be a simple platonic relationship with no touching, licking, kissing, sucking, or penetration. That, Sir, is not homoSEXuality. That is usually called friendship and one's right to freedom of association with whomever one pleases.
I think I'll just go ahead and keep pointing out the flaws in your posts in this thread.
Men like having anal sex with women because of your soul-in-the-butt rubbish?
You're making less sense with each post.