Gonz molṑn labé Staff member Jul 4, 2010 #81 What if the explosion seals the main hole but creates new cracks nearby, potentially allowing more oil to escape?
What if the explosion seals the main hole but creates new cracks nearby, potentially allowing more oil to escape?
Winky Well-Known Member Jul 5, 2010 #84 The ballerina has spoken You never want a serious crisis to go to waste
catocom Well-Known Member Jul 11, 2010 #85 posted 6-4-2010 catocom said: yeah, I was wondering if the couldn't get those bolts out of that flange, and try to 'clamp' another pipe, same size, then bolt it on. Seems to me they should try to do this thing sectional too, instead of a one shot thing. Click to expand... They finally decided to unbolt it. They should have been at this point at least 60 days ago. pic for fox's web site:
posted 6-4-2010 catocom said: yeah, I was wondering if the couldn't get those bolts out of that flange, and try to 'clamp' another pipe, same size, then bolt it on. Seems to me they should try to do this thing sectional too, instead of a one shot thing. Click to expand... They finally decided to unbolt it. They should have been at this point at least 60 days ago. pic for fox's web site:
catocom Well-Known Member Jul 11, 2010 #86 WooHoo! They just set the first section in place and sealed that sucker! http://mfile.akamai.com/97892/live/reflector:31499.asx?bkup=31500
WooHoo! They just set the first section in place and sealed that sucker! http://mfile.akamai.com/97892/live/reflector:31499.asx?bkup=31500
catocom Well-Known Member Jul 11, 2010 #87 well, I should clarify... The whole thing isn't sealed, just that first section. These people are doing it right now though.
well, I should clarify... The whole thing isn't sealed, just that first section. These people are doing it right now though.
catocom Well-Known Member Jul 15, 2010 #88 well, to me it looks like the test is really successful atm.