Oh those progressive Liberals!
- Thread starter Winky
- Start date
Winky
Well-Known Member
Bishy stop and thunk for a sec.
M'Kay?
duh doctors and by extension the state in a socialistic medical setting have the control over the dispensation of medical care.
So...
They come to the customer and say:
Yer wee tot ain't gonna make it. We can put it down for you. Hey maybe I don't know nuthin' but even here with our Govt. insurance Medicare denied my Mom care when she was terminally ill with cancer.
Hey of course I understand that but don't fool yourself thinking that if the parents want the State to spend zillions on a lost cause that they will.
Here if your paying your playing the folks with dah bucks can get whatever they want. There because the Govt. runs it your taking what their givin' or we can kill your Kid\spouse\Parent for ya!
Yep this is merely a logical extension of the nanny State!
So it is the States choice whether or not they will give ya the care not yours.
What recourse do you have?
M'Kay?
duh doctors and by extension the state in a socialistic medical setting have the control over the dispensation of medical care.
So...
They come to the customer and say:
Yer wee tot ain't gonna make it. We can put it down for you. Hey maybe I don't know nuthin' but even here with our Govt. insurance Medicare denied my Mom care when she was terminally ill with cancer.
Hey of course I understand that but don't fool yourself thinking that if the parents want the State to spend zillions on a lost cause that they will.
Here if your paying your playing the folks with dah bucks can get whatever they want. There because the Govt. runs it your taking what their givin' or we can kill your Kid\spouse\Parent for ya!
Yep this is merely a logical extension of the nanny State!
So it is the States choice whether or not they will give ya the care not yours.
What recourse do you have?
freako104
Well-Known Member
MrBishop said:
I did miss that myself and I support the parents decision.
PT it does not make you a hypocrite. One is killing a fetus the other is killing a baby. I am pro choice but against the killing of a born baby(I will make an exception for this IF THE PARENTS WISH IT)
Gato_Solo
Out-freaking-standing OTC member
freako104 said:
Okay...Scenario time...
You have an 18-month old son, who has become a burden to you, or your spouse. You both get together, and decide that euthanization is the best recourse. Here's your exception...run with it.
BTW...did I mention that the child is not sick?
Professur
Well-Known Member
Tell me, Freako. What difference is there between a fetus and a born baby, that isn't there between a born baby and an adult?
As far as I can tell, the term fetus is a word, given by scientists to describe a stage of development of a living being. It isn't a dividing line between living and non-living.
As far as I can tell, the term fetus is a word, given by scientists to describe a stage of development of a living being. It isn't a dividing line between living and non-living.
What's the big deal? And once more...adoption is not a choice in this.
Professur
Well-Known Member
MrBishop said:
No. Not 'nuff said? Stan. Not hardly.
I've a cousin. Major kidney damage. Wasn't supposed to live past 6. He's adopted, btw. My aunt got him, because he wasn't supposed to survive. She was fairly low on the list, because of her age.
Well, Bish. You met the little cunt. Did he look dead to you? unhealthy? In pain? He's well into his 20's now. Still on treatments, on his own partly working kidneys.
Well, with this new law that you're so fucking happy about, his birth mother would just have had him put down. Does that make it any more clear to you?