Open debate...Keep it civil.

So...is the question:

Can women perform equally well on a battlefield as men do?
or
Do women cause more trouble on teh battlefield than they're worth?

'cause..this thread degraded so quickly that it's hard to keep track of any traces of intelligent discourse anymore.
 
Shadow you say:

"it's wrong that there are different standards for different sexes with the same job at the end of the line"

And I say it is not.

Because...

The 'sexes' are different.

so which is true?

That the Sexes are different?
Or Men are better at certain jobs than Wimen? Hmmm?
 
Men are better at some jobs than women
Women are better at some jobs than men
Both are equally adept at some jobs.
 
Winky said:
Shadow you say:

"it's wrong that there are different standards for different sexes with the same job at the end of the line"

And I say it is not.

Because...

The 'sexes' are different.

so which is true?

That the Sexes are different?
Or Men are better at certain jobs than Wimen? Hmmm?

now, i probably misinterpreted your post then, did i?

please explain, why is it NOT wrong that there are different standards for a job where people should meet certain standards?
if a job has certain requirements, then those requirements should be met, no matter what gender the person has, who fullfilles the job.

for me, that is true. why? because women want to be treated as equals of men, in the things they do. in order to be treated as equals, they should should meet equal standards. simple as that.
 
Hey Big "G"
Yeah I read that book.
The author is the poster child
for the metrosexuals' lol

Jeez read that link and tell me.
How many Metro's are closed minded jackbooted neocon neanderthals?

Good God the Libby males have created Metro just to
try to justify their existence. If it walks like a duck quacks like a Duck but it still likes gurls that don't mean it ain't a Duck screwed up but still a Duck.

"Outing someone is not a thing to be contemplated lightly, but I feel it is my duty to let the world know that David Beckham, role model to hundreds of millions of impressionable boys around the world, heartthrob for equal numbers of young girls, is not heterosexual after all. No, ladies and gents, the captain of the England football squad is actually a screaming, shrieking, flaming, freaking metrosexual. (He'll thank me for doing this one day, if only because he didn't have to tell his mother himself.)"

Link

Now I'm beginning to see...

Let's make it a rule that only metro's Gays and Women can be in the military.
There’s no place left in society for closed minded jackbooted neocon Neanderthals
certainly NOT the military!!!
 
hahaha :D

and that's where i stop making any effort in argueing. there's just no point in doing so, if somebody has such a fucked up, narrow minded view on what he thinks is reality.

thanks for the good laugh though mate :D
 
Shadow it's OK
we knew you were metro
there's nuthin' to be ashamed of... :rolleyes:

don't ask don't tell
 
so? like i said, same rules should apply. these kind of things are exactly what i meant NOT to happen. if those women are so bloody worried about their hair, they shouldn't be cops in the first place, knowing they'll have to wear a uniform.
 
But it wouldn't be PC to make the rules the same
because wimen ain't the same to if you are going to
be PC then you have to make the rules different fer
the gurls and then... ad infinitum

Hey Dood I agree make the rules the same
Hell there's no chance in Hell even when I was young enough that I would have been accepted as a Navy Seal
but if we are gonna have to have G.I. Jane Navy Seals
then we'll have to make accommodations for the fairer Sex I'm sure Yup Uh Huh!
 
Back
Top