Sarah Palin Book Tour Launches
- Thread starter Cerise
- Start date
ResearchMonkey
Well-Known Member
When in History has an elected president won with such a margin fall so far in just 10 months? Unprecedented.
BeardofPants
New Member
Who the frak cares? 
JTP
New Member
Here's what Susan says:
" I really hate defending Sarah Palin. I mean, I don't agree with her on anything. Seeing a woman at her level saying and doing some of the things she says and does is like nails screeching against a blackboard for me. And while she ultimately helps Democrats in any partisan contest, her brand of polarizing politics and efforts to annihilate the moderate wing of the Republican Party ultimately aren't very good for her own party (not my problem) or the country (everyone's problem).
And while I'm at it, it drives me crazy when she goes around blaming the McCain campaign for her mistakes instead of taking responsibility. The list goes on.
The problem is that the media can't seem to figure out that she deserves to be treated like Dick Armey or Newt Gingrich or Dick Cheney. Disagree with her. Point out that she's wrong more often than she's right, and that she doesn't know what she's talking about on key issues. Call her a quitter, by all means, and a sore sport and a bad loser. Ask her hard questions, or even medium-hard questions, and see if she can answer. Push her on whether she's more interested in fame and glory than making change happen.
Just don't put her on the cover in running shorts.
I'm talking, of course, about the Newsweek cover, which took a picture Palin posed for as part of a spread in Runner's World magazine about how she loves running and used it to turn her into a pinup girl. She is not a girl, and she is not a pinup.
Palin criticized the cover as "sexist and oh-so-expected." She's right. But too many liberals are being quoted praising it. How soon they forget. Calling Gov. Palin the "Caribou Barbie" and "Governor Gidget" actually pushed her numbers higher among women. It's both sexist and stupid. It was only when Palin fell on her face with Katie Couric that many women felt free to abandon her.
The irony is that the cover, far from skewering Palin, as was its clear intent, helps her. The picture overwhelms the caption — "How Do You Solve A Problem Like Sarah? She's Bad News for the GOP and Everyone Else, Too" — and reduces it to a hit piece. It makes Palin a heroine to the people who hate the liberal media, reinforcing the view that the media are biased against conservatives. It makes women like me horrendously uncomfortable, because sexism is not OK under any circumstances. And it makes non-political, moderate women (you know, the kind who decide every election) more sympathetic to a woman who, on most issues (not just abortion, but health care, for instance, and stem cell research), is on the opposite side of them.
Oh, yes, and for sure it will sell books. Magazines, too. Everybody wins except women, who are still eye candy, even if they get to the point of being their party's nominee for vice president. That's the message, and it applies to all of us. It's not a liberal versus conservative issue: I've seen just as bad and worse done to Hillary. It's about sexism and powerful women and how they can be trivialized. And this is why, once again, I have to defend Sarah Palin.
To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM
" I really hate defending Sarah Palin. I mean, I don't agree with her on anything. Seeing a woman at her level saying and doing some of the things she says and does is like nails screeching against a blackboard for me. And while she ultimately helps Democrats in any partisan contest, her brand of polarizing politics and efforts to annihilate the moderate wing of the Republican Party ultimately aren't very good for her own party (not my problem) or the country (everyone's problem).
And while I'm at it, it drives me crazy when she goes around blaming the McCain campaign for her mistakes instead of taking responsibility. The list goes on.
The problem is that the media can't seem to figure out that she deserves to be treated like Dick Armey or Newt Gingrich or Dick Cheney. Disagree with her. Point out that she's wrong more often than she's right, and that she doesn't know what she's talking about on key issues. Call her a quitter, by all means, and a sore sport and a bad loser. Ask her hard questions, or even medium-hard questions, and see if she can answer. Push her on whether she's more interested in fame and glory than making change happen.
Just don't put her on the cover in running shorts.
I'm talking, of course, about the Newsweek cover, which took a picture Palin posed for as part of a spread in Runner's World magazine about how she loves running and used it to turn her into a pinup girl. She is not a girl, and she is not a pinup.
Palin criticized the cover as "sexist and oh-so-expected." She's right. But too many liberals are being quoted praising it. How soon they forget. Calling Gov. Palin the "Caribou Barbie" and "Governor Gidget" actually pushed her numbers higher among women. It's both sexist and stupid. It was only when Palin fell on her face with Katie Couric that many women felt free to abandon her.
The irony is that the cover, far from skewering Palin, as was its clear intent, helps her. The picture overwhelms the caption — "How Do You Solve A Problem Like Sarah? She's Bad News for the GOP and Everyone Else, Too" — and reduces it to a hit piece. It makes Palin a heroine to the people who hate the liberal media, reinforcing the view that the media are biased against conservatives. It makes women like me horrendously uncomfortable, because sexism is not OK under any circumstances. And it makes non-political, moderate women (you know, the kind who decide every election) more sympathetic to a woman who, on most issues (not just abortion, but health care, for instance, and stem cell research), is on the opposite side of them.
Oh, yes, and for sure it will sell books. Magazines, too. Everybody wins except women, who are still eye candy, even if they get to the point of being their party's nominee for vice president. That's the message, and it applies to all of us. It's not a liberal versus conservative issue: I've seen just as bad and worse done to Hillary. It's about sexism and powerful women and how they can be trivialized. And this is why, once again, I have to defend Sarah Palin.
To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM
Cerise
Well-Known Member
I am saying when you want to examine Presidential approval ratings, compare or contrast them to the same point in time in each of their tenures.
When the glorious day arrives that signals the end of obama's term, then look at Bush's equivalent approval ratings. It is likely that Bush's will be higher.
catocom
Well-Known Member
I can't tell her apart from charlie Rangle
Cerise
Well-Known Member
Estrich and Charlie Rangel separated at birth.
MrBishop
Well-Known Member
2 months after 9-11 - nah, couldn't have anything to do with it at all. Let's see the August 01 numbers.
MrBishop
Well-Known Member
Aah..here we go
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/22952302/a_brief_history_of_bushs_flameout/print
March 13, 2001
Bush abandons campaign pledge to cut climate-warming pollution
Approval Rating March 26-28, 2001: 53%
June 7, 2001
Bush signs $1.3 trillion tax cut
Approval Rating June 11-17, 2001: 55%
August 6, 2001
President's Daily Brief: "Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in U.S."
Approval Rating August 10-12, 2001: 57%
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/22952302/a_brief_history_of_bushs_flameout/print
March 13, 2001
Bush abandons campaign pledge to cut climate-warming pollution
Approval Rating March 26-28, 2001: 53%
June 7, 2001
Bush signs $1.3 trillion tax cut
Approval Rating June 11-17, 2001: 55%
August 6, 2001
President's Daily Brief: "Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in U.S."
Approval Rating August 10-12, 2001: 57%
ResearchMonkey
Well-Known Member
So he was moving up anyway...
MrBishop
Well-Known Member
Cerise
Well-Known Member
Bush's first August numbers?
From your source: 57%
obama's first August numbers?
From my previous source, Gallup: They are 54% for the same Aug. period you cited for Bush.
It looks like obama was still running behind Bush.
But, hey, thanks for playing.
