Gonz said:The ingredients of socialism are 90% of the ingredients of communism. Since socialism is a step towards communism, why wouldn't you need socialism? It is a key factor.
freako104 said:were the countries that were/are communist ever socialist?
Karl Marx said:"Between capitalist and communist society lies the period of the revolutionary transformation of the one into the other. Corresponding to this is also a political transition period in which the state can be nothing but the revolutionary dictatorship of the proletariat."
chcr said:As I said, communism requires socialism as a part of the process. It is not required in the final "product" (Although it has been used. Socialism, OTOH, has no need of communism. May I suggest you "read" the book?
Some of them. Cuba still is, more or less.
Shadowfax said:now, do you really want to argue about something like this, while you know he won't change his mind, ever?
freako104 said:you or one of the other liberals on here
Gonz said:I have read it.
Communism is like kindergarten. Nobody is particularly great at anything & we should all share.
Socialism is like college. We should all share our strengths to make the whole better. When we get someting we'll share the stuff that sucks & keep for ourselves the good stuff.
Capitalism is like war. To the victor go the spoils.
in the end, they are the same.
The quick 'n' easy way to remember the difference between Socialism and Communism is: Socialism is "from each according to their ability, to each according to their DEEDS," whereas Communism is "from each according to their ability to each according to their NEEDS."
Gotnolegs said:Not really, I just find it hard to disagree with someone who seems to think it's ok to espouse a system where a child with a brain tumour can be sent home to die because their father doesn't have the wherewithall to pay the insurance
The quick 'n' easy way to remember the difference between Socialism and Communism is: Socialism is "from each according to their ability, to each according to their DEEDS," whereas Communism is "from each according to their ability to each according to their NEEDS."
Gonz said:It's even more fun to disagree with someone who takes their understanding of life from a movie.
Gonz said:but when your wife needs a breast X-ray to determine if it's cancer, it'll only take 6 months to a year to get it. Yessir, that socialism is certainly a god send.
Gonz said:Personal testimony from both Canada (Toronto) & Great Britain (England; Manchester)
Gonz said:Too bad that is bass-ackwards. John the working stifff could afford his health insurance. Bob the bum gets his for free because they up the TAXES John pays. So from the deeds to the needs. Yep, that is certainly a motivating factor to keep working, you get to pay somebody else's bills as well as your own. Not only that but when your wife needs a breast X-ray to determine if it's cancer, it'll only take 6 months to a year to get it. Yessir, that socialism is certainly a god send.
You really might as well go outside, pick up a rock and argue with it. You might get farther.chcr said:You know, I've said time and again that socialism is not a workable concept in a human society. The discussion at hand is whether or not it is the same as communism, which it patently is not. You quote elemental differences while maintaining they're the same things. Circular argument again, I'm sorry I let myself get sucked into this one. Once again, everything says what you say it says regardless of what it actually says.