Gato_Solo
Out-freaking-standing OTC member
how so? please explain each of these three.
1. He's Canadian.
2. He's Canadian.
3. He's an avowed atheist who posts quite a bit about his thoughts on religion.
how so? please explain each of these three.
1. He's Canadian.
2. He's Canadian.
3. He's an avowed atheist who posts quite a bit about his thoughts on religion.
Personally I find the WBC as annoying as the militant homosexuals on the otherside. meh.
1. He's Canadian.
2. He's Canadian.
3. He's an avowed atheist who posts quite a bit about his thoughts on religion.
Kinda like that guy at the military base. I guess that he wasn't a terrorist either..just a criminal. Depends on who's doing the labellings, eh.
If he was promoting jihad, he was a terrorist. If he was a nutjob, he's a criminal.
Context is everything.
Rev 2:6 But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate.
Mat 6:24 No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
that does nothing to explain the trajectory of his views that you've asserted.
minkey said:perhaps i should start suggesting you have the opinions you do because you're in the navy, er, that other one...
So...because you can't see it, it isn't there.
the burden is upon you to clearly articulate your assertion. that hasn't happened yet.
jesus hated the roman masters and wanted 'em dead. only later did they turn him into a cheek-turning wuss.
apparently a docile population is preferable to those in power than a sword-swinging uppity one. imagine that.