Professur said:
Here's an option that should make everyone happy.
All women are entitled to exactly one abortion. But, that abortion involves complete removal of the uterus.
Everyone happy?
Not really because oddly enough, there are medical reasons for abortions, and if you plan on stopping a woman from ever having children again because she happened to have one bad pregnancy that most likely would've taken her life and the life of her child without intervention, then why not just take the big route and cut off the guys balls (you know...the 2nd person involved in fertilizing the ova) while you're at it?
Take this case in particular...
If we had let God/Nature take it's course without medical intervention... the woman would've miscarried or died during childbirth. The cervex is barely large enough to allow one head through...two heads are out of the question. The foetus/child/baby (without the joys of C-Section) could not have exited the vagina..period. It would've died there eventually...perhaps causing hemorageing, perhaps causing the mother's death as well. If the mother survived, she'd still have to have the dead foetus removed.
The C-Section was prompted well before her 40th week of pregnancy. This was most likely because the foetus was under duress because of malformed organs, shared blood volume, heart defects etc... this was done to avoid the nearly ineviteable miscarriage. If, by whatever luck..the foetus survived to term, the C-Section would've been necessary.
Despite all this..the child/children die...why? Because you don't believe in the Guff? Because people who are not theologians are arguing over when the soul enters the foetus?
The mother and father are highly religious...that's obvious from the nearly immediate baptism of the girls...they're so religious that they would never have thought of abortion...they're just not religious enough to have considered another A-word into their decision...Adultery. (Sex before marriage).
tsk tsk