Answered THAT in the virginity thread... not about to type it again lol... but yeah if it was two guys i don't think I'd have hated it.
I have a theory about threesomes with two guys..."It's just ASKING for something to end up in your ass"
Answered THAT in the virginity thread... not about to type it again lol... but yeah if it was two guys i don't think I'd have hated it.
lol... that's funny. I might use that sometime... somewhere... in some conversation I don't know why I'd end up having somewhere but... ?I might!I have a theory about threesomes with two guys..."It's just ASKING for something to end up in your ass"
lol... that's funny. I might use that sometime... somewhere... in some conversation I don't know why I'd end up having somewhere but... ?I might!
Well actually it could come up in conversation but seeing as most of... well... I guess all of my friends are gay guys, it could end up being said but... in a slightly different context lol.
Seems like the mouth and coochie would be easier... one guy on knees, girl on all fours doung the suckie-suckie, other guy is doing her doggystyle. That or you'd have a real sandwich and I can't see that being that comfortable.
You put way too much thought into this.
Seems like a question of simple physics to me. 2 bodies of mass cannot occupy the same space and seeing as how slot A is reeeeally close to slot B you would run into that conundrum.
You know...maybe it is physically possible but it has to be exceptionally uncomfortable for everyone involved and is probably used "in the movies" as a voyeuristic visual thrill and in no way something that could be pleasurably duplicated.
You know...maybe it is physically possible but it has to be exceptionally uncomfortable for everyone involved and is probably used "in the movies" as a voyeuristic visual thrill and in no way something that could be pleasurably duplicated.
DVDA pays more than any other act..."in the movies"...
Double vaginal, double anal.